Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti Pc-Angiodynamics

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 6 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=9108 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.4%
Allowance Rate
n=9108
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=9108
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=5948
-0.52σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=5948
1000 days
Time to Allowance
n=5948
+8.3pp
Interview Lift
n=9108
19.8%
RCE Rate
n=9108
1.0%
Appeal Rate
n=9108

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.6%
§101 Overcome
n=450
79.8%
§102 Overcome
n=2111
81.3%
§103 Overcome
n=3337
83.4%
§112 Overcome
n=2965

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61B, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=9108
0
Practitioners
n=9108
Apps / Practitioner
n=9108 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (17%)
5
Medium (83%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (67%)
§102 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
3
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WEHRHEIM, LINDSEY GAIL 1 78.9% +20.4%
MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY 1 64.1% +33.7%
CLARK, RYAN T 1 50.2% +18.0%
RASSAVONG, ERIC 1 71.5% +34.4%
LEE, DAVINA EN-YIN 1 39.2% +13.0%
HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN 1 71.1% +16.3%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18055004 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROBE NAVIGATION OF AN ABLATION SYSTEM LEE, DAVINA EN-YIN 73d overdue

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18055004 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROBE NAVIGATION OF AN ABLATION SYSTEM LEE, DAVINA EN-YIN 73d overdue
17869687 DEVICE AND METHOD OF USE FOR ASPIRATION SYSTEM RETRIEVERS HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN 29d overdue
19015986 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRICALLY ABLATING TISSUE OF A PATIENT WEHRHEIM, LINDSEY GAIL
18969427 TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING AN IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION SYSTEM MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY
18905204 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ABLATING A TISSUE SITE BY ELECTROPORATION WITH REAL-TIME PULSE MONITORING CLARK, RYAN T
18884248 SMART ASPIRATION SYSTEM AND LASER ACTIVATION SYSTEM RASSAVONG, ERIC

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
AngioDynamics 5
Eximo Medical Ltd. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37961
37941
37711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19015986 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRICALLY ABLATING TISSUE OF A PATIENT AngioDynamics, Inc. WEHRHEIM, LINDSEY GAIL §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 10, 2025
18969427 TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING AN IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION SYSTEM AngioDynamics, Inc. MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 05, 2024
18905204 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ABLATING A TISSUE SITE BY ELECTROPORATION WITH REAL-TIME PULSE MONITORING AngioDynamics, Inc. CLARK, RYAN T §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 03, 2024
18884248 SMART ASPIRATION SYSTEM AND LASER ACTIVATION SYSTEM Eximo Medical Ltd. RASSAVONG, ERIC 3796 §103Other Non-Final OA Pending Sep 13, 2024
18055004 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROBE NAVIGATION OF AN ABLATION SYSTEM AngioDynamics, Inc. LEE, DAVINA EN-YIN 3794 §103§112 Non-Final OA 73d overdue Pending Nov 14, 2022
17869687 DEVICE AND METHOD OF USE FOR ASPIRATION SYSTEM RETRIEVERS AngioDynamics, Inc. HOAG, MITCHELL BRAIN 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 29d overdue Pending Jul 20, 2022

Managing Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti Pc-Angiodynamics's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month