Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

HICKMAN BECKER BINGHAM LEDESMA LLP has 5 pending office actions in Computing & Software. The career record includes 2979 applications, giving the current docket context within a substantial software-focused prosecution history. The active matter count is limited, but it identifies ongoing examination work in a technically broad field.

The resolved allowance rate is 90.25%, and allowances have required an average of 4.46 office actions. The rate indicates the share of resolved matters reaching allowance, while the action average signals that those successful matters may involve several examination exchanges. Practitioners can use the distinction when budgeting response work and evaluating claim-development strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2979 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.2%
Allowance Rate
n=2979
+0.70σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2979
4.5
OAs to Allowance
n=1999
+0.36σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1999
1229 days
Time to Allowance
n=1999
+4.9pp
Interview Lift
n=2979
41.4%
RCE Rate
n=2979
2.7%
Appeal Rate
n=2979

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

88.3%
§101 Overcome
n=727
88.6%
§102 Overcome
n=711
88.3%
§103 Overcome
n=1302
88.7%
§112 Overcome
n=619

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
55%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2979
1
Practitioners
n=2979
2979.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=2979

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (60%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
40% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE 1 68.7% +22.9%
WORKU, KIDEST 1 84.9% +2.8%
COLLINS, GARY 1 83.3% +15.4%
LEE, JENNIFER V 1 24.9% +39.1%
STEINBERG, AMANDA L 1 51.7% +26.1%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19182262 INTEGRATED VEHICLE ACCESS AND USAGE TRACKING SYSTEM JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE —
18807944 CONFIGURATION METHOD FOR A POWER SUPPLY CONTROLLER AND A CONTROLLER EMPLOYING SAME WORKU, KIDEST —
18608919 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING ANATOMICAL MODELS COLLINS, GARY —
18608911 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE FOR UPLOADING IMAGE DATA AND APPROVING SEGMENTED IMAGE DATA LEE, JENNIFER V —
18136545 MONITORING USERS WITH A MOBILE DEVICE WHILE THE USERS ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES STEINBERG, AMANDA L —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19182262 INTEGRATED VEHICLE ACCESS AND USAGE TRACKING SYSTEM JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE —
18608919 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING ANATOMICAL MODELS COLLINS, GARY —
18608911 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE FOR UPLOADING IMAGE DATA AND APPROVING SEGMENTED IMAGE DATA LEE, JENNIFER V —
18136545 MONITORING USERS WITH A MOBILE DEVICE WHILE THE USERS ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES STEINBERG, AMANDA L —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Ricoh 2
Standard Fleet, Inc. 1
Rohm 1
Alexander F. Castellanos 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36991
21191
21151
36881
37921

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19182262 INTEGRATED VEHICLE ACCESS AND USAGE TRACKING SYSTEM Standard Fleet, Inc. JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE 3699 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 17, 2025
18807944 CONFIGURATION METHOD FOR A POWER SUPPLY CONTROLLER AND A CONTROLLER EMPLOYING SAME Rohm Co., Ltd. WORKU, KIDEST 2119 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 17, 2024
18608919 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING ANATOMICAL MODELS Ricoh Company, Ltd. COLLINS, GARY 2115 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18608911 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE FOR UPLOADING IMAGE DATA AND APPROVING SEGMENTED IMAGE DATA Ricoh Company, Ltd. LEE, JENNIFER V 3688 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18136545 MONITORING USERS WITH A MOBILE DEVICE WHILE THE USERS ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES Alexander F. Castellanos STEINBERG, AMANDA L 3792 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 19, 2023

Managing Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP's patent allowance rate?

90.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP were allowed, across 2,979 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP average before allowance?

4.46 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month