Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Hopewell Ip, P.C.

Technology area: Computing & Software

13 pending office actions • 2 clients • 13 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Hopewell IP, P.C. manages patent prosecution in the Computing & Software technology area. The firm has handled 96 career applications with a resolved allowance rate of 100.0 percent. This allowance rate indicates that every application reaching a final resolution has been successfully granted. This success is documented across its entire career history for this profile.

The firm currently handles 12 pending office actions, showing an active and ongoing workload. On average, the firm requires 2.47 office actions per allowance. This average of 2.47 actions is achieved while maintaining the 100.0 percent allowance rate across its 96 career applications. Practitioners can view these 12 pending actions as the current stage of the firm's prosecution efforts. The 2.47 average office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for the typical path to a patent grant.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=96 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

100.0%
Allowance Rate
n=96
+0.72σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=96
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=43
-0.87σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=43
1007 days
Time to Allowance
n=43
+0.0pp
Interview Lift
n=96
44.2%
RCE Rate
n=96
5.0%
Appeal Rate
n=96

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

41.7%
§101 Overcome
n=24
—
§102 Overcome
n=11 (min 20)
59.4%
§103 Overcome
n=32
—
§112 Overcome
n=15 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

G06N, G06F, G06V
Top CPC Subclasses
92%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=96
1
Practitioners
n=96
96.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=96

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (92%)
1
Medium (8%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other7 (54%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (31%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
12
Information Tech
92% of docket
1
Communications
8% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEMMA, SAMSON B 1 88.2% +11.1%
BHATNAGAR, ANAND P 1 91.6% +2.1%
TONG, JUSTIN CHE-CHUN 1 45.5% +32.7%
RAWLINGS, ZANE ALEXANDER 1 — —
FIGUEROA, KEVIN W 1 70.1% +20.4%
RUTTEN, JAMES D 1 63.4% +37.7%
WONG, WILLIAM 1 31.7% +26.9%
CHIUSANO, ANDREW TSUTOMU 1 56.2% +27.3%
UDDIN, MD I 1 77.0% +73.5%
SHALU, ZELALEM W 1 31.9% +21.7%

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17405939 TWO-HEADED ATTENTION FUSED AUTOENCODER FOR CONTEXT-AWARE RECOMMENDATION ALSHAHARI, SADIK AHMED 5d
17987761 SHARED MODEL TRAINING WITH PRIVACY PROTECTIONS UDDIN, MD I 55d
19209181 IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING DISPARATE GROUP IMPACT IN DIFFERENTIAL-PRIVACY MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS LEMMA, SAMSON B —
18988381 WEAKLY SUPERVISED ACTION SELECTION LEARNING IN VIDEO BHATNAGAR, ANAND P —
18738557 MODEL EVALUATION METRICS AND EFFECTIVE MODEL SELECTION RAWLINGS, ZANE ALEXANDER —
18672874 CONTEXT OPTIMIZATION FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION FIGUEROA, KEVIN W —
18618757 CALIBRATED MODEL INTERVENTION WITH CONFORMAL THRESHOLD RUTTEN, JAMES D —
18206395 MODEL DISTILLATION FOR REDUCING ITERATIONS OF NON-AUTOREGRESSIVE DECODERS WONG, WILLIAM —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17987761 SHARED MODEL TRAINING WITH PRIVACY PROTECTIONS UDDIN, MD I 55d
19209181 IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING DISPARATE GROUP IMPACT IN DIFFERENTIAL-PRIVACY MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS LEMMA, SAMSON B —
18903771 OPTIMIZING THROUGHPUT OF MACHINE-LEARNING APPLICATIONS TONG, JUSTIN CHE-CHUN —
18672874 CONTEXT OPTIMIZATION FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION FIGUEROA, KEVIN W —
18618757 CALIBRATED MODEL INTERVENTION WITH CONFORMAL THRESHOLD RUTTEN, JAMES D —
18206395 MODEL DISTILLATION FOR REDUCING ITERATIONS OF NON-AUTOREGRESSIVE DECODERS WONG, WILLIAM —
18202450 LEARNED DENSITY ESTIMATION WITH IMPLICIT MANIFOLDS CHIUSANO, ANDREW TSUTOMU —
17969238 DISTANCE-BASED PAIR LOSS FOR COLLABORATIVE FILTERING SHALU, ZELALEM W —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 12
Hamid R. Tizhoosh 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21212
21442
24981
26681
21961
21231
21241
21691
21451
21001

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19209181 IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING DISPARATE GROUP IMPACT IN DIFFERENTIAL-PRIVACY MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS The Toronto-Dominion Bank LEMMA, SAMSON B 2498 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 15, 2025
18988381 WEAKLY SUPERVISED ACTION SELECTION LEARNING IN VIDEO The Toronto-Dominion Bank BHATNAGAR, ANAND P 2668 §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2024
18903771 OPTIMIZING THROUGHPUT OF MACHINE-LEARNING APPLICATIONS The Toronto-Dominion Bank TONG, JUSTIN CHE-CHUN 2196 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 01, 2024
18738557 MODEL EVALUATION METRICS AND EFFECTIVE MODEL SELECTION The Toronto-Dominion Bank RAWLINGS, ZANE ALEXANDER 2123 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18672874 CONTEXT OPTIMIZATION FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank FIGUEROA, KEVIN W 2124 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2024
18618757 CALIBRATED MODEL INTERVENTION WITH CONFORMAL THRESHOLD The Toronto-Dominion Bank RUTTEN, JAMES D 2121 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2024
18206395 MODEL DISTILLATION FOR REDUCING ITERATIONS OF NON-AUTOREGRESSIVE DECODERS The Toronto-Dominion Bank WONG, WILLIAM 2144 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2023
18202450 LEARNED DENSITY ESTIMATION WITH IMPLICIT MANIFOLDS The Toronto-Dominion Bank CHIUSANO, ANDREW TSUTOMU 2144 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 26, 2023
17987761 SHARED MODEL TRAINING WITH PRIVACY PROTECTIONS Hamid R. Tizhoosh UDDIN, MD I 2169 §101§103 Non-Final OA 55d Pending Nov 15, 2022
17969238 DISTANCE-BASED PAIR LOSS FOR COLLABORATIVE FILTERING The Toronto-Dominion Bank SHALU, ZELALEM W 2145 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 19, 2022
17968653 TRANSLATION MODEL WITH LEARNED POSITION AND CORRECTIVE LOSS The Toronto-Dominion Bank KIM, SEHWAN 2100 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 18, 2022
17485837 HORIZON-AWARE CUMULATIVE ACCESSIBILITY ESTIMATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank MANG, VAN C 2126 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2021
17405939 TWO-HEADED ATTENTION FUSED AUTOENCODER FOR CONTEXT-AWARE RECOMMENDATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank ALSHAHARI, SADIK AHMED 2121 §103§112 Final Rejection 5d Pending Aug 18, 2021

Managing Hopewell Ip, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hopewell Ip, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

100.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Hopewell Ip, P.C. were allowed, across 96 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Hopewell Ip, P.C. average before allowance?

2.47 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Hopewell Ip, P.C. have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 13 examiners in 11 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month