Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Ip Delta Plus Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

IP Delta Plus Inc. focuses on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems, where it has filed 248 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 88.95 and is currently addressing 5 pending office actions. These figures indicate a steady success rate in its specialized technology area. The 248 career applications show a consistent commitment to this technical field over time.

The firm averages 3.69 office actions per allowance, reflecting the typical effort required to secure an allowance. This average of 3.69 office actions per allowance, paired with the 88.95 resolved allowance rate pct, defines the firm's prosecution profile. The 5 pending office actions currently active will likely adhere to these established performance metrics. Practitioners can use the 3.69 office actions per allowance figure to estimate the timeline and resources needed for ongoing prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=248 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.0%
Allowance Rate
n=248
+0.64σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=248
3.7
OAs to Allowance
n=153
+0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=153
1071 days
Time to Allowance
n=153
-0.6pp
Interview Lift
n=248
33.1%
RCE Rate
n=248
0.4%
Appeal Rate
n=248

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

78.8%
§101 Overcome
n=33
85.9%
§102 Overcome
n=64
77.3%
§103 Overcome
n=110
83.3%
§112 Overcome
n=60

Specialization & Scale

H04L, G06F, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
25%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=248
0
Practitioners
n=248
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=248 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (60%)
§103 only2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
REICHERT, RACHELLE LEIGH 1 30.1% +33.4%
KREMER, MATTHEW 1 43.6% +52.2%
KASSIM, IMAD MUTEE 1 74.6% +30.8%
PHAM, TIMOTHY X 1 86.5% +16.7%
DIYAN, OLUWATOSIN OLUWATUMININ 1 27.3% +54.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18599883 UNDERGROUND UTILITY DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD USING A MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR PERFORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DETECTION PHAM, TIMOTHY X 10d overdue

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18373056 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR VARIABLE-VISCOSITY CARRIER VAPORIZERS DIYAN, OLUWATOSIN OLUWATUMININ 26d
19196605 METHOD AND MONITORING SYSTEM USING MACHINE LEARNING TO MONITOR COGNITIVE OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT REICHERT, RACHELLE LEIGH —
19039824 METHOD AND COMPUTING DEVICE USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR PULMONARY ARTERY PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BASED ON ELECTRICAL IMPEDENCE TOMOGRAPHY KREMER, MATTHEW —
18666875 COMPUTING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR INFERRING AN ENTITY AND A RELATIONSHIP RELATED TO A TOPIC FROM UNSTRUCTURED DATA TEXT KASSIM, IMAD MUTEE —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18599883 UNDERGROUND UTILITY DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD USING A MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR PERFORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DETECTION PHAM, TIMOTHY X 10d overdue
18373056 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR VARIABLE-VISCOSITY CARRIER VAPORIZERS DIYAN, OLUWATOSIN OLUWATUMININ 26d
19196605 METHOD AND MONITORING SYSTEM USING MACHINE LEARNING TO MONITOR COGNITIVE OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT REICHERT, RACHELLE LEIGH —
19039824 METHOD AND COMPUTING DEVICE USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR PULMONARY ARTERY PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BASED ON ELECTRICAL IMPEDENCE TOMOGRAPHY KREMER, MATTHEW —
18666875 COMPUTING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR INFERRING AN ENTITY AND A RELATIONSHIP RELATED TO A TOPIC FROM UNSTRUCTURED DATA TEXT KASSIM, IMAD MUTEE —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
12163004 Canada Inc. 1
Displaid Inc. 1
Sr AI Inc. 1
GEODAR INC 1
Airgraft 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36861
37911
21291
36481
17551

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19196605 METHOD AND MONITORING SYSTEM USING MACHINE LEARNING TO MONITOR COGNITIVE OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT 12163004 Canada Inc. REICHERT, RACHELLE LEIGH 3686 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2025
19039824 METHOD AND COMPUTING DEVICE USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR PULMONARY ARTERY PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BASED ON ELECTRICAL IMPEDENCE TOMOGRAPHY Displaid Inc. KREMER, MATTHEW 3791 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 29, 2025
18666875 COMPUTING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR INFERRING AN ENTITY AND A RELATIONSHIP RELATED TO A TOPIC FROM UNSTRUCTURED DATA TEXT Sr AI Inc. KASSIM, IMAD MUTEE 2129 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending May 17, 2024
18599883 UNDERGROUND UTILITY DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD USING A MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR PERFORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DETECTION Geodar Inc. PHAM, TIMOTHY X 3648 §103 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Mar 08, 2024
18373056 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR VARIABLE-VISCOSITY CARRIER VAPORIZERS Airgraft Inc. DIYAN, OLUWATOSIN OLUWATUMININ 1755 §103 Final Rejection 26d Pending Sep 26, 2023

Managing Ip Delta Plus Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ip Delta Plus Inc.'s patent allowance rate?

89.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ip Delta Plus Inc. were allowed, across 248 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ip Delta Plus Inc. average before allowance?

3.69 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ip Delta Plus Inc. have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month