Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Ipkey Pllc

7 pending office actions • 7 clients • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=145 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.1%
Allowance Rate
n=145
+0.49σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=145
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=77
-0.90σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=77
685 days
Time to Allowance
n=77
+2.8pp
Interview Lift
n=145
19.8%
RCE Rate
n=145
1.7%
Appeal Rate
n=145

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=8 (min 20)
70.0%
§102 Overcome
n=30
65.3%
§103 Overcome
n=49
77.4%
§112 Overcome
n=31

Specialization & Scale

G06T, B25J, B23K
Top CPC Subclasses
32%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=145
2
Practitioners
n=145
72.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=145

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (29%)
§103 only3 (43%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE 1 46.7% +30.5%
YANOSKA, JOSEPH ANDERSON 1 39.0% +38.5%
ARANT, HARRY E 1 49.0% +22.1%
STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 1 61.5% -12.1%
PETERS, BRIAN O 1 72.9% +16.2%
KELLY-O'NEILL, YOLANDA LYNNETTE 1 31.4% +32.1%
VU, VU A 1 92.3% +6.7%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18504593 METHOD FOR DETERMINING CROSSTALK OF QUANTUM BITS, QUANTUM CONTROL SYSTEM, AND QUANTUM COMPUTER VU, VU A 10d overdue
19005504 GEOMETRIC PUZZLE HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE 3d overdue
18952506 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ONLINE MODEL PREDICTIVE PLANNING BASED ON LEARNING IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF CONSTRAINT YANOSKA, JOSEPH ANDERSON
18859664 HEAT EXCHANGE TUBE FOR HEAT EXCHANGER, AND HEAT EXCHANGER ARANT, HARRY E

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19005504 GEOMETRIC PUZZLE HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE 3d overdue
18419065 PUZZLE KITS PETERS, BRIAN O 26d
18952506 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ONLINE MODEL PREDICTIVE PLANNING BASED ON LEARNING IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF CONSTRAINT YANOSKA, JOSEPH ANDERSON
18859664 HEAT EXCHANGE TUBE FOR HEAT EXCHANGER, AND HEAT EXCHANGER ARANT, HARRY E
18560634 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SYNTHETIC HYDROCARBONS FROM BIOMASS KELLY-O'NEILL, YOLANDA LYNNETTE

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37112
36641
37631
36581
16921
28971

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19005504 GEOMETRIC PUZZLE Andreas Hoenigschmid HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE 3711 §103§112 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Dec 30, 2024
18952506 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ONLINE MODEL PREDICTIVE PLANNING BASED ON LEARNING IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF CONSTRAINT Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology YANOSKA, JOSEPH ANDERSON 3664 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 19, 2024
18859664 HEAT EXCHANGE TUBE FOR HEAT EXCHANGER, AND HEAT EXCHANGER Sanhua (Hangzhou) Micro Channel Heat Exchanger Co., Ltd. ARANT, HARRY E 3763 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 24, 2024
18747432 TOOL CALIBRATION FOR MANUFACTURING ROBOTS Path Robotics, Inc. STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 3658 §103 Final Rejection 57d Pending Jun 18, 2024
18419065 PUZZLE KITS Kevin D. Schlapik PETERS, BRIAN O 3711 §103Other Non-Final OA 26d Pending Jan 22, 2024
18560634 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SYNTHETIC HYDROCARBONS FROM BIOMASS Atomic Energy Of Canada Limited KELLY-O'NEILL, YOLANDA LYNNETTE 1692 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 13, 2023
18504593 METHOD FOR DETERMINING CROSSTALK OF QUANTUM BITS, QUANTUM CONTROL SYSTEM, AND QUANTUM COMPUTER Origin Quantum Computing Technology (Hefei) Co., Ltd. VU, VU A 2897 §101§112 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Nov 08, 2023

Managing Ipkey Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month