Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 4 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM | 2 | 66.7% | -6.7% |
| HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE | 1 | 46.7% | +30.6% |
| PETERS, BRIAN O | 1 | 72.8% | +16.1% |
| VU, VU A | 1 | 92.3% | +6.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19005504 | GEOMETRIC PUZZLE | HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE | 3d overdue |
| 18419065 | PUZZLE KITS | PETERS, BRIAN O | 26d |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Path Robotics, Inc. | 2 |
| Andreas Hoenigschmid | 1 |
| Kevin D. Schlapik | 1 |
| ORIGIN QUANTUM COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY (HEFEI) CO., LTD | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3711 | 2 |
| 3658 | 2 |
| 2897 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19005504 | GEOMETRIC PUZZLE | Andreas Hoenigschmid | HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE | 3711 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 3d overdue | Pending | Dec 30, 2024 |
| 18747432 | TOOL CALIBRATION FOR MANUFACTURING ROBOTS | Path Robotics, Inc. | STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM | 3658 | §103 | Final Rejection | 57d | Pending | Jun 18, 2024 |
| 18419065 | PUZZLE KITS | Kevin D. Schlapik | PETERS, BRIAN O | 3711 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Jan 22, 2024 |
| 18504593 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING CROSSTALK OF QUANTUM BITS, QUANTUM CONTROL SYSTEM, AND QUANTUM COMPUTER | Origin Quantum Computing Technology (Hefei) Co., Ltd. | VU, VU A | 2897 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 10d overdue | Pending | Nov 08, 2023 |
| 18179796 | TOOL CALIBRATION FOR MANUFACTURING ROBOTS | Path Robotics, Inc. | STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM | 3658 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 57d | Pending | Mar 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial