Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ipkey Pllc

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

IPkey PLLC has managed 156 career applications in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm currently has 8 pending office actions and a resolved allowance rate pct of 95.74.

Prosecution at the firm involves an avg office actions per allowance of 2.02. This 2.02 figure provides a basis for practitioners to anticipate the number of examiner interactions required in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The 95.74 resolved allowance rate pct reflects the proportion of cases that reached allowance relative to the 156 career applications. The 8 pending office actions represent the current cases awaiting a USPTO response.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=156 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.7%
Allowance Rate
n=156
+0.49σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=156
2.0
OAs to Allowance
n=90
-0.96σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=90
670 days
Time to Allowance
n=90
+1.7pp
Interview Lift
n=156
17.0%
RCE Rate
n=156
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=156

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=8 (min 20)
71.0%
§102 Overcome
n=31
66.7%
§103 Overcome
n=51
72.7%
§112 Overcome
n=33

Specialization & Scale

G06T, B25J, B23K
Top CPC Subclasses
31%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=156
2
Practitioners
n=156
78.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=156

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (17%)
5
Medium (83%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 2 66.7% -4.0%
LAROSE, RENEE MARIE 1 79.2% +9.2%
BELAY, DILNESSA B 1 62.1% +26.0%
KELLY-O'NEILL, YOLANDA LYNNETTE 1 33.3% +29.9%
VU, VU A 1 92.4% +6.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18504593 METHOD FOR DETERMINING CROSSTALK OF QUANTUM BITS, QUANTUM CONTROL SYSTEM, AND QUANTUM COMPUTER VU, VU A 10d overdue

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18419428 SCAN PLANNING AND SCAN OPERATIONS FOR WELDING AN OBJECT BELAY, DILNESSA B —
18560634 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SYNTHETIC HYDROCARBONS FROM BIOMASS KELLY-O'NEILL, YOLANDA LYNNETTE —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36582
36561
16921
28971

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19252489 MACHINE LEARNING LOGIC-BASED ADJUSTMENT TECHNIQUES FOR ROBOTS Path Robotics, Inc. LAROSE, RENEE MARIE 3656 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 27, 2025
18747432 TOOL CALIBRATION FOR MANUFACTURING ROBOTS Path Robotics, Inc. STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 3658 §103 Final Rejection 57d Pending Jun 18, 2024
18419428 SCAN PLANNING AND SCAN OPERATIONS FOR WELDING AN OBJECT Path Robotics, Inc. BELAY, DILNESSA B §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 22, 2024
18560634 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SYNTHETIC HYDROCARBONS FROM BIOMASS Atomic Energy Of Canada Limited KELLY-O'NEILL, YOLANDA LYNNETTE 1692 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2023
18504593 METHOD FOR DETERMINING CROSSTALK OF QUANTUM BITS, QUANTUM CONTROL SYSTEM, AND QUANTUM COMPUTER Origin Quantum Computing Technology (Hefei) Co., Ltd. VU, VU A 2897 §101§112 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Nov 08, 2023
18179796 TOOL CALIBRATION FOR MANUFACTURING ROBOTS Path Robotics, Inc. STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 3658 §103 Final Rejection 57d Pending Mar 07, 2023

Managing Ipkey Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month