Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

K&L Gates LLP - Tessera

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

7 pending office actions • 1 client • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

K&L Gates LLP - Tessera has 7 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The associated record lists 34332 career applications, an 84.49% resolved allowance rate, and 3.82 average office actions per allowance. The profile links a focused current workload to a broad historical application record.

The allowance rate and office-action average describe resolved activity and should not be used as a direct prediction for pending Tessera matters. They do indicate that allowance has involved multiple examination interactions in the recorded portfolio. Practitioners should build responses around the particular biological or pharmaceutical distinctions, disclosure support, and rejection grounds in each case.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=34332 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.5%
Allowance Rate
n=34332
+0.65σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=34332
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=20756
+0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=20756
1083 days
Time to Allowance
n=20756
+9.0pp
Interview Lift
n=34332
32.5%
RCE Rate
n=34332
2.7%
Appeal Rate
n=34332

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

76.3%
§101 Overcome
n=2444
77.1%
§102 Overcome
n=9062
77.7%
§103 Overcome
n=15328
77.8%
§112 Overcome
n=10507

Specialization & Scale

A61K, H01M, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=34332
90
Practitioners
n=34332
381.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=34332

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
3
Medium (43%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (29%)
§112 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEITH, NANCY J 2 74.7% +44.0%
PERSONS, JENNA L 1 50.8% +61.7%
ZARA, JANE J 1 71.0% +16.1%
LEE, JAE W 1 65.6% +38.5%
KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE 1 57.5% +66.2%
MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE 1 52.8% +67.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17929124 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME LEE, JAE W 6d
18061632 TEMPLATE GUIDE RNA MOLECULES ZARA, JANE J —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19272711 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME LEITH, NANCY J 89d overdue
19272775 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME LEITH, NANCY J 86d overdue
18469344 SERPINA-MODULATING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS PERSONS, JENNA L 49d overdue
17929124 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME LEE, JAE W 6d
17577942 RECOMBINASE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE 21d
18061632 TEMPLATE GUIDE RNA MOLECULES ZARA, JANE J —
17823726 HOST DEFENSE SUPPRESSING METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Flagship Pioneering 7

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16362
16372
16352
16561

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19272711 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME Flagship Pioneering Innovations Vi, LLC LEITH, NANCY J 1636 §103Other Final Rejection 89d overdue Pending Jul 17, 2025
19272775 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME Flagship Pioneering Innovations Vi, LLC LEITH, NANCY J 1636 §103Other Final Rejection 86d overdue Pending Jul 17, 2025
18469344 SERPINA-MODULATING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Flagship Pioneering Innovations Vi, LLC PERSONS, JENNA L 1637 §103§112DP Non-Final OA 49d overdue Pending Sep 18, 2023
18061632 TEMPLATE GUIDE RNA MOLECULES Flagship Pioneering Innovations Vi, LLC ZARA, JANE J 1637 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2022
17929124 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME Flagship Pioneering Innovations Vi, LLC LEE, JAE W 1656 §103§112 Final Rejection 6d Pending Sep 01, 2022
17823726 HOST DEFENSE SUPPRESSING METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOME Flagship Pioneering Innovations Vi, LLC KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE 1635 §112Other Final Rejection — Pending Aug 31, 2022
17577942 RECOMBINASE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE Flagship Pioneering Innovations Vi, LLC MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE 1635 §112 Final Rejection 21d Pending Jan 18, 2022

Managing K&L Gates LLP - Tessera's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is K&L Gates LLP - Tessera's patent allowance rate?

84.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by K&L Gates LLP - Tessera were allowed, across 34,332 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does K&L Gates LLP - Tessera average before allowance?

3.82 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does K&L Gates LLP - Tessera have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 6 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month