Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
7 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP focuses on Chemistry & Materials, having managed 1343 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 78.83. Currently, there are 3 pending office actions. The 78.83 resolved allowance rate pct across 1343 applications demonstrates a track record in the Chemistry & Materials field. The 3 pending office actions are fewer than the career applications.
The avg office actions per allowance is 2.99. This indicates that the firm typically reaches a resolution through its prosecution efforts. The 2.99 avg office actions per allowance provides an expectation for the prosecution timeline. With 1343 career applications, the firm's performance metrics are based on its work in Chemistry & Materials, supporting the 78.83 resolved allowance rate pct. Practitioners can use these metrics to set expectations for the prosecution cycle.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (14%) |
| §101 + other | 2 (29%) |
| §103 only | 1 (14%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (43%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | 2 | 33.5% | +25.0% |
| TRAN, HAI | 1 | 62.1% | +31.8% |
| WOODALL, NICHOLAS W | 1 | 82.0% | +13.3% |
| OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH | 1 | 50.0% | +61.5% |
| BECHTEL, KEVIN M | 1 | 70.5% | +61.3% |
| BRAVO, JOCELYN MARY | 1 | 50.1% | +45.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18903138 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED SCAM DETECTION | BECHTEL, KEVIN M | 12d |
| 19427141 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED SCAM DETECTION | TRAN, HAI | — |
| 19219739 | FIXATION ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF USE | WOODALL, NICHOLAS W | — |
| 19004729 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
| 18897977 | BRA PAD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | BRAVO, JOCELYN MARY | — |
| 18808850 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18903138 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED SCAM DETECTION | BECHTEL, KEVIN M | 12d |
| 19427141 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED SCAM DETECTION | TRAN, HAI | — |
| 19219739 | FIXATION ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF USE | WOODALL, NICHOLAS W | — |
| 19004729 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
| 18961769 | PERSONAL CARE PRODUCT COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A FATTY AMIDE AND METHODS FOR MAKING SAME | OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH | — |
| 18897977 | BRA PAD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | BRAVO, JOCELYN MARY | — |
| 18808850 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Scamnetic Inc. | 2 |
| Ideavillage Products Corp. | 2 |
| Extremity Medical, LLC | 1 |
| Ash Ingredients | 1 |
| Chico'S Brands Investments, Inc. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3695 | 1 |
| 1789 | 1 |
| 2491 | 1 |
| 3732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19427141 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED SCAM DETECTION | Scamnetic Inc. | TRAN, HAI | 3695 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 19, 2025 |
| 19219739 | FIXATION ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF USE | Extremity Medical, LLC | WOODALL, NICHOLAS W | §102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 27, 2025 | |
| 19004729 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | Ideavillage Products Corp. | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | 1789 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 30, 2024 |
| 18961769 | PERSONAL CARE PRODUCT COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A FATTY AMIDE AND METHODS FOR MAKING SAME | Ash Ingredients Inc. | OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 | |
| 18903138 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED SCAM DETECTION | Scamnetic Inc. | BECHTEL, KEVIN M | 2491 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Oct 01, 2024 |
| 18897977 | BRA PAD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME | Chico'S Brands Investments, Inc. | BRAVO, JOCELYN MARY | 3732 | §101§102§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
| 18808850 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | Ideavillage Products Corp. | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial