Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Laabs Intellectual Property

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 4 clients • 8 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Laabs Intellectual Property works in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and has 421 career applications. The profile records 11 pending office actions and a resolved allowance rate of 98.11%, meaning allowance is the recorded result for nearly all resolved matters in this dataset.

The average of 3.43 office actions per allowance supplies a separate view of prosecution activity. It indicates the office-action path associated with allowed matters, while the allowance rate describes the resolution outcome. The pending docket identifies current work, and the application history gives practitioners a substantial base for interpreting these measures when reviewing workload, case strategy, or expected prosecution attention.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=421 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

98.1%
Allowance Rate
n=421
+0.69σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=421
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=312
+0.17σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=312
850 days
Time to Allowance
n=312
+2.2pp
Interview Lift
n=421
29.2%
RCE Rate
n=421
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=421

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=13 (min 20)
88.5%
§102 Overcome
n=192
88.1%
§103 Overcome
n=185
88.0%
§112 Overcome
n=100

Specialization & Scale

F41B, F41A, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
61%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=421
0
Practitioners
n=421
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=421 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (91%)
1
Medium (9%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (18%)
§103 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)8 (73%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
18% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
73% of docket
1
Business / Other
9% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R 4 72.7% +21.7%
NEWTON, JASON TODD 1 82.8% +22.2%
ELLIOTT, ANDREW JAMES 1 0.0% +0.0%
GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 1 59.0% +23.2%
TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S 1 77.8% +11.4%
PRICE, MITCHELL JAMES 1 66.7% +42.9%
RUFO, LOUIS J 1 54.6% +22.8%
CHIU, MAY LEUNG 1 43.3% +26.1%

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18032173 AN AUTONOMOUS NANOFLUIDIC ANALYSIS DEVICE AND A METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF DNA MOLECULES CHIU, MAY LEUNG 56d
19056570 Archery Bowstring with Multiple Portions NEWTON, JASON TODD —
19049910 Archery Bow with Pass Through Cabling NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R —
18991013 Arrow Bending Axis Orientation ELLIOTT, ANDREW JAMES —
18984805 Archery Bow Stand GARFT, CHRISTOPHER —
18946765 Archery Bow Limb Cup Attachment NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R —
18927573 Archery Bow with Limb Spacing Adjustment NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R —
18907339 Archery Bow Cam Weight TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18267445 METHOD FOR LOCALLY APPLYING A METAL NANOLAMINATE IN THE REGION OF A WELD SEAM OF A METAL WORKPIECE RUFO, LOUIS J 26d overdue
18032173 AN AUTONOMOUS NANOFLUIDIC ANALYSIS DEVICE AND A METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF DNA MOLECULES CHIU, MAY LEUNG 56d
19056570 Archery Bowstring with Multiple Portions NEWTON, JASON TODD —
19049910 Archery Bow with Pass Through Cabling NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R —
18984805 Archery Bow Stand GARFT, CHRISTOPHER —
18946765 Archery Bow Limb Cup Attachment NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R —
18927573 Archery Bow with Limb Spacing Adjustment NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R —
18907339 Archery Bow Cam Weight TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37115
36731
36321
36111
17951
17581

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19056570 Archery Bowstring with Multiple Portions Mcp Ip, LLC NEWTON, JASON TODD 3673 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 18, 2025
19049910 Archery Bow with Pass Through Cabling Mcp Ip, LLC NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R 3711 §101§102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 10, 2025
18991013 Arrow Bending Axis Orientation Mcp Ip, LLC ELLIOTT, ANDREW JAMES 3711 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18984805 Archery Bow Stand Mcp Ip, LLC GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 3632 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 17, 2024
18946765 Archery Bow Limb Cup Attachment Mcp Ip, LLC NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R 3711 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18927573 Archery Bow with Limb Spacing Adjustment Mcp Ip, LLC NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R 3711 §101§102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18907339 Archery Bow Cam Weight Mcp Ip, LLC TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 04, 2024
18888021 Archery Bow with Stacked Limbs Mcp Ip, LLC NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R 3711 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 17, 2024
18829224 AMPHIBIOUS VEHICLE AND STEERING SYSTEM Ontario Drive & Gear Limited PRICE, MITCHELL JAMES 3611 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 09, 2024
18267445 METHOD FOR LOCALLY APPLYING A METAL NANOLAMINATE IN THE REGION OF A WELD SEAM OF A METAL WORKPIECE Technische Universitat Hamburg RUFO, LOUIS J 1795 §103 Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending Jun 14, 2023
18032173 AN AUTONOMOUS NANOFLUIDIC ANALYSIS DEVICE AND A METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF DNA MOLECULES Universität Hamburg CHIU, MAY LEUNG 1758 §102§103 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Apr 15, 2023

Managing Laabs Intellectual Property's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Laabs Intellectual Property's patent allowance rate?

98.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Laabs Intellectual Property were allowed, across 421 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Laabs Intellectual Property average before allowance?

3.43 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Laabs Intellectual Property have?

11 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 8 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month