Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Landmark Intellectual Property Law, LLC

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Landmark Intellectual Property Law, LLC works in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and has 474 career applications. It records 6 pending office actions and a resolved allowance rate of 92.21%, indicating that most resolved matters reached allowance.

The average of 5.9 office actions per allowance describes the prosecution activity associated with allowed matters. This is a separate planning signal from the allowance rate, because it addresses effort rather than outcome. The pending docket identifies current activity, while the application history gives practitioners context for reviewing the profile's resolution pattern and office-action burden.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=474 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.2%
Allowance Rate
n=474
+0.91σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=474
5.9
OAs to Allowance
n=379
+0.59σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=379
1343 days
Time to Allowance
n=379
+7.7pp
Interview Lift
n=474
44.8%
RCE Rate
n=474
2.0%
Appeal Rate
n=474

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

89.9%
§101 Overcome
n=119
88.8%
§102 Overcome
n=125
89.7%
§103 Overcome
n=252
88.6%
§112 Overcome
n=185

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G07F, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
42%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=474
0
Practitioners
n=474
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=474 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (17%)
§101 + other2 (33%)
§103 only2 (33%)
§112 only1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
83% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ANDERSON, SCOTT C 2 58.6% +31.8%
FAROKHROOZ, FATIMA N 1 49.3% +32.6%
MARCETICH, ADAM M 1 72.8% +18.8%
GARTLAND, SCOTT D 1 10.9% +12.2%
NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 1 30.1% +39.8%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17859254 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application ANDERSON, SCOTT C 358d overdue
14828948 TARGETED ADVERTISING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A RETAIL KIOSK GARTLAND, SCOTT D 43d overdue
17210755 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application ANDERSON, SCOTT C 79d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17859254 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application ANDERSON, SCOTT C 358d overdue
13717424 NOTEBOOK TRANSACTION CARD HOLDER NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 146d overdue
14828948 TARGETED ADVERTISING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A RETAIL KIOSK GARTLAND, SCOTT D 43d overdue
17210755 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application ANDERSON, SCOTT C 79d
19043438 DECORATIVE ITEM WITH INTERNAL REMOVABLE PROJECTOR FAROKHROOZ, FATIMA N —
18738027 DRAIN POUCHING FLANGE AND POUCH SYSTEM MARCETICH, ADAM M —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36942
28751
37811
36851
37351

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19043438 DECORATIVE ITEM WITH INTERNAL REMOVABLE PROJECTOR Mindscope Products FAROKHROOZ, FATIMA N 2875 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 01, 2025
18738027 DRAIN POUCHING FLANGE AND POUCH SYSTEM Sanguine Technology, LLC MARCETICH, ADAM M 3781 §112Other Final Rejection — Pending Jun 09, 2024
17859254 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application E2INTERACTIVE, INC. ANDERSON, SCOTT C 3694 §101 Final Rejection 358d overdue Pending Jul 07, 2022
17210755 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application E2INTERACTIVE, INC. ANDERSON, SCOTT C 3694 §101§112 Non-Final OA 79d Pending Mar 24, 2021
14828948 TARGETED ADVERTISING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A RETAIL KIOSK E2INTERACTIVE, INC. GARTLAND, SCOTT D 3685 §101§103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Aug 18, 2015
13717424 NOTEBOOK TRANSACTION CARD HOLDER E2INTERACTIVE, INC. NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 3735 §103 Final Rejection 146d overdue Pending Dec 17, 2012

Managing Landmark Intellectual Property Law, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Landmark Intellectual Property Law, LLC's patent allowance rate?

92.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Landmark Intellectual Property Law, LLC were allowed, across 474 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Landmark Intellectual Property Law, LLC average before allowance?

5.90 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Landmark Intellectual Property Law, LLC have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month