Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Law Office Of Michael J. Pennington

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Law Office of Michael J. Pennington manages a portfolio in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering with 268 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 86.45 percent for applications that reach a final resolution. Achieving these results involves an average of 3.39 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm has 5 pending office actions to address.

The 268 career applications and 86.45 percent allowance rate reflect the firm's practice in its primary technology area. The 3.39 average office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for expected examiner interaction during the patent acquisition process. These figures offer a data-grounded view of the firm's historical performance and current workload for practitioners evaluating the firm's Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering experience.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=268 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.4%
Allowance Rate
n=268
+0.48σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=268
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=185
-0.15σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=185
965 days
Time to Allowance
n=185
+6.7pp
Interview Lift
n=268
29.0%
RCE Rate
n=268
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=268

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

86.0%
§101 Overcome
n=43
85.2%
§102 Overcome
n=81
81.3%
§103 Overcome
n=139
84.6%
§112 Overcome
n=117

Specialization & Scale

H04W, H04L, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
35%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=268
0
Practitioners
n=268
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=268 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (40%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TROST IV, WILLIAM GEORGE 1 72.3% -4.5%
MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E 1 46.5% +54.6%
HAGOS, EYOB 1 66.3% +43.1%
TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 1 55.4% +46.2%
DEEAN, DEEPAK A 1 48.9% +42.4%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17051355 SOLAR APPLIANCE DEEAN, DEEPAK A 12d
17163358 CONTROLLED RELEASE DOSAGE FORMS OF 5-AMINOSALICYLIC ACID AND PROCESS THEREOF TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 26d
18318653 METHOD AND SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MANAGING SENSORS IN ENVIRONMENT HAGOS, EYOB 33d
18562611 MODULAR AND PORTABLE PLUG-AND-TRAIN ROBOT FOR PROVIDING HAND REHABILITATION MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17051355 SOLAR APPLIANCE DEEAN, DEEPAK A 12d
17163358 CONTROLLED RELEASE DOSAGE FORMS OF 5-AMINOSALICYLIC ACID AND PROCESS THEREOF TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 26d
18318653 METHOD AND SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MANAGING SENSORS IN ENVIRONMENT HAGOS, EYOB 33d
18562611 MODULAR AND PORTABLE PLUG-AND-TRAIN ROBOT FOR PROVIDING HAND REHABILITATION MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37851
28571
16151
37621

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18778967 WEARABLE RING DEVICE FOR MANAGING WIRELESS CHARGING AND NFC COMMUNICATION Conzumex Industries Private Limited TROST IV, WILLIAM GEORGE §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 20, 2024
18562611 MODULAR AND PORTABLE PLUG-AND-TRAIN ROBOT FOR PROVIDING HAND REHABILITATION Christian Medical College MILLER, CHRISTOPHER E 3785 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2023
18318653 METHOD AND SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MANAGING SENSORS IN ENVIRONMENT Digitectura Technologies Pvt. Ltd. HAGOS, EYOB 2857 §101§103 Non-Final OA 33d Pending May 16, 2023
17163358 CONTROLLED RELEASE DOSAGE FORMS OF 5-AMINOSALICYLIC ACID AND PROCESS THEREOF Atoz Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd. TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 1615 §103§112 Final Rejection 26d Pending Jan 30, 2021
17051355 SOLAR APPLIANCE Indian Institute Of Technology Bombay DEEAN, DEEPAK A 3762 §103§112 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Oct 28, 2020

Managing Law Office Of Michael J. Pennington's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month