Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Lynch LLP

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Lynch LLP focuses on Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics, having managed 183 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 74.83 percent, indicating a majority of its resolved cases result in a patent.

The firm averages 2.58 office actions per allowance, which shows the level of examiner interaction needed to reach an allowance. Currently, the firm has 4 pending office actions, representing a segment of its 183 career applications.

The 74.83 percent allowance rate provides a baseline for success in the semiconductor and optics fields. With 4 pending office actions, the firm is currently managing a set of active applications. The 2.58 average office actions per allowance helps practitioners set expectations for the prosecution process in these technical areas and evaluate the firm's performance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=184 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

74.8%
Allowance Rate
n=184
+0.23σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=184
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=107
-0.62σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=107
828 days
Time to Allowance
n=107
+22.0pp
Interview Lift
n=184
13.3%
RCE Rate
n=184
2.8%
Appeal Rate
n=184

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=16 (min 20)
58.1%
§102 Overcome
n=43
58.1%
§103 Overcome
n=74
71.9%
§112 Overcome
n=57

Specialization & Scale

G06F, A63B, F16M
Top CPC Subclasses
19%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=184
1
Practitioners
n=184
184.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=184

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
3
Medium (60%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (40%)
§103 only2 (40%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
2
Semiconductors
40% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LO, ANDREW S 1 72.2% +27.6%
MAUPIN, HUGH H 1 87.4% +6.4%
JOHNSON, RASHAD H 1 80.7% +12.7%
KANG, IRENE S 1 16.4% +26.2%
VOGT, JACOB BUI 1 44.4% +85.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19187527 PEST DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS MAUPIN, HUGH H —
18941626 VIRTUAL MASS SYSTEMS AND METHODS JOHNSON, RASHAD H —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18893875 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF OPTIMIZING RETIREMENT PLANS KANG, IRENE S 45d overdue
18433280 DOCUMENT DATA EXTRACTION AND SEARCHING VOGT, JACOB BUI —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18893875 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF OPTIMIZING RETIREMENT PLANS KANG, IRENE S 45d overdue
19259849 MULTIMODAL FITNESS BAR LO, ANDREW S —
18941626 VIRTUAL MASS SYSTEMS AND METHODS JOHNSON, RASHAD H —
18433280 DOCUMENT DATA EXTRACTION AND SEARCHING VOGT, JACOB BUI —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28841
28341
36961
26531

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19259849 MULTIMODAL FITNESS BAR Castle Fit Corporation LO, ANDREW S §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2025
19187527 PEST DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS Farmsense, Inc. MAUPIN, HUGH H 2884 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2025
18941626 VIRTUAL MASS SYSTEMS AND METHODS Nodal Film Systems LLC JOHNSON, RASHAD H 2834 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18893875 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF OPTIMIZING RETIREMENT PLANS Celeritas Technology Holdings, LLC KANG, IRENE S 3696 §101§103 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Sep 23, 2024
18433280 DOCUMENT DATA EXTRACTION AND SEARCHING Base64.Ai, Inc. VOGT, JACOB BUI 2653 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 05, 2024

Managing Lynch LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month