Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Malloy & Malloy

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 9 clients • 11 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 64 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MALLOY & MALLOY has handled 1717 career applications, primarily focusing on the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 88.75 percent. This allowance rate is achieved with an average of 1.98 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm has 12 pending office actions.

These metrics describe the prosecution process, as the firm maintains its average office actions to secure an allowance across its 1717 career applications. The combination of an 88.75 percent allowance rate and the 1.98 average indicates the firm's handling of patent matters. For practitioners, this average serves as a benchmark for the firm's typical path to allowance in the medical devices sector. The 1717 career applications provide a broad data set for evaluating these performance metrics.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1721 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.6%
Allowance Rate
n=1721
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1721
2.0
OAs to Allowance
n=1170
-0.72σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1170
879 days
Time to Allowance
n=1170
+5.3pp
Interview Lift
n=1721
10.1%
RCE Rate
n=1721
0.3%
Appeal Rate
n=1721

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

69.4%
§101 Overcome
n=85
81.7%
§102 Overcome
n=355
79.4%
§103 Overcome
n=529
84.2%
§112 Overcome
n=443

Specialization & Scale

A61M, A61B, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1721
0
Practitioners
n=1721
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1721 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
4
Medium (36%)
2
Easy (18%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (9%)
§103 only2 (18%)
§102 only2 (18%)
§112 only2 (18%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (36%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
18% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
9% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
45% of docket
3
Business / Other
27% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BARNETT, DEVIN K 1 56.6% +26.2%
BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 1 65.5% +14.9%
COLLINS, DARRYL J 1 89.1% +4.9%
BENNETT, KAYLA MARIE 1 97.3% +3.4%
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 1 80.1% +13.9%
FOWLER, DANIEL WAYNE 1 72.7% +12.4%
RICCI, CRAIG D 1 53.5% +52.7%
KIM, DANIELLE A 1 37.1% +56.3%
HUSSAINI, ATTIYA SAYYADA 1 60.0% +16.1%
HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER 1 61.4% +22.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
29947931 VERTICAL MOUNTING ASSEMBLY BENNETT, KAYLA MARIE —
18667284 SEATING SYSTEM FOR SPORTS VENUES AND AUDITORIUMS BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18354749 Stabilizing Lower-Body Swimming Garment HOEY, ALISSA L 535d overdue
19178590 HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE FURNITURE LEG BARNETT, DEVIN K —
19014149 SYSTEMS AND ASSEMBLIES FOR CONNECTING PANEL STRUCTURES BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —
18894332 EYEWEAR SYSTEM WITH REPLACEABLE LENSES COLLINS, DARRYL J —
18433084 PHYTOCANNABINOID FORMULATIONS AND METHODS FOR EXTRACTION KIM, DANIELLE A —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18496624 SHADE CANOPY TENSIONING ASSEMBLY HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER 23d overdue
18652006 INTERNAL BIPOLAR RADIOFREQUENCY PROBE FOWLER, DANIEL WAYNE 22d overdue
19178590 HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE FURNITURE LEG BARNETT, DEVIN K —
19014149 SYSTEMS AND ASSEMBLIES FOR CONNECTING PANEL STRUCTURES BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —
18667284 SEATING SYSTEM FOR SPORTS VENUES AND AUDITORIUMS BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —
18595072 LIPOSOME VITAMIN C PREPARATION RICCI, CRAIG D —
18433084 PHYTOCANNABINOID FORMULATIONS AND METHODS FOR EXTRACTION KIM, DANIELLE A —
18521757 METHOD OF TREATING A PATIENT AND APPARATUS THEREFOR HUSSAINI, ATTIYA SAYYADA —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36362
28721
29241
37941
16111
16131
37961
37321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19178590 HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE FURNITURE LEG Tuuci Worldwide, LLC BARNETT, DEVIN K §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 14, 2025
19014149 SYSTEMS AND ASSEMBLIES FOR CONNECTING PANEL STRUCTURES Amp Ip LLC BUCKLE JR, JAMES J §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2025
18894332 EYEWEAR SYSTEM WITH REPLACEABLE LENSES Fgx International Inc. COLLINS, DARRYL J 2872 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 24, 2024
29947931 VERTICAL MOUNTING ASSEMBLY Americanflat Corporation BENNETT, KAYLA MARIE 2924 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 18, 2024
18667284 SEATING SYSTEM FOR SPORTS VENUES AND AUDITORIUMS Series International, LLC BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 3636 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending May 17, 2024
18652006 INTERNAL BIPOLAR RADIOFREQUENCY PROBE A Hoyos LLC FOWLER, DANIEL WAYNE 3794 §102 Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending May 01, 2024
18595072 LIPOSOME VITAMIN C PREPARATION One Innovation Labs, LLC RICCI, CRAIG D 1611 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 04, 2024
18433084 PHYTOCANNABINOID FORMULATIONS AND METHODS FOR EXTRACTION One Innovation Labs, LLC KIM, DANIELLE A 1613 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2024
18521757 METHOD OF TREATING A PATIENT AND APPARATUS THEREFOR Neuroreform Ip, LLC HUSSAINI, ATTIYA SAYYADA 3796 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 28, 2023
18496624 SHADE CANOPY TENSIONING ASSEMBLY Tuuci Worldwide, LLC HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER 3636 §112 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Oct 27, 2023
18354749 Stabilizing Lower-Body Swimming Garment The Otters Company, LLC HOEY, ALISSA L 3732 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection 535d overdue Pending Jul 19, 2023

Managing Malloy & Malloy's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month