Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
15 pending office actions • 10 clients • 14 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 29 patents granted in the last 365 days
This profile covers Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and includes 1677 career applications. The resolved allowance rate is 78.89%, with an average of 3.09 office actions per allowance. The record shows a substantial prosecution base, an allowance outcome reported for a majority of resolved matters, and several examination events before allowance.
There are 14 pending office actions, so the current workload is active but defined. Practitioners can use the historical rate to frame outcome expectations and the action average to plan response effort. Because the pending matters remain unresolved, each requires separate analysis of claim scope, cited art, and prosecution posture rather than reliance on the portfolio-level history.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (20%) |
| §103 only | 4 (27%) |
| §102 only | 2 (13%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 6 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J | 2 | 70.0% | +31.7% |
| IGNACZEWSKI, JAMES EDWARD | 1 | 81.6% | -5.4% |
| WEEKS, GLORIA R | 1 | 70.4% | +12.4% |
| LEA EDMONDS, LISA S | 1 | 87.0% | +4.9% |
| FLETCHER, JERRY-DARYL | 1 | 46.0% | +38.8% |
| PILCHER, JONATHAN L | 1 | 64.3% | +43.8% |
| HACKENBERG, RACHEL J | 1 | 78.1% | +24.1% |
| OQUENDO, CARIB A | 1 | 78.0% | +12.2% |
| HUNTSINGER, PETER K | 1 | 29.0% | +17.6% |
| ALAM, MUSHFIKH I | 1 | 58.2% | +38.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19306816 | Convertible Door Handle | IGNACZEWSKI, JAMES EDWARD | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18127414 | Computer Vision Systems and Methods for Property Scene Understanding from Digital Images and Videos | O'SHEA, BRENDAN S | 87d overdue |
| 18689690 | Apparatus for Servicing a Structure | TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J | 29d |
| 19107988 | Stand for a Display Screen | LEA EDMONDS, LISA S | — |
| 19051969 | Assessing Spatial Cognition in Human Subjects | FLETCHER, JERRY-DARYL | — |
| 19047911 | Methods for Petroleum Coke Carbon Capture and Sequestration | PILCHER, JONATHAN L | — |
| 18952333 | System and Method for Dynamic Device Discovery and Address Assignment | HACKENBERG, RACHEL J | — |
| 18843987 | Apparatus for Servicing a Structure | OQUENDO, CARIB A | — |
| 18720492 | AUTOMATED INSPECTION SYSTEM | HUNTSINGER, PETER K | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18698657 | INTERACTIVE SERVICES | ALAM, MUSHFIKH I | 38d overdue |
| 18689690 | Apparatus for Servicing a Structure | TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J | 29d |
| 19086260 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CUTTING FOOD ARTICLES AND FILLING CONTAINERS THEREWITH | WEEKS, GLORIA R | — |
| 19051969 | Assessing Spatial Cognition in Human Subjects | FLETCHER, JERRY-DARYL | — |
| 19047911 | Methods for Petroleum Coke Carbon Capture and Sequestration | PILCHER, JONATHAN L | — |
| 18952333 | System and Method for Dynamic Device Discovery and Address Assignment | HACKENBERG, RACHEL J | — |
| 18843987 | Apparatus for Servicing a Structure | OQUENDO, CARIB A | — |
| 18720492 | AUTOMATED INSPECTION SYSTEM | HUNTSINGER, PETER K | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Sky CP Limited | 3 |
| RotoTech Pte Ltd. | 3 |
| SKAN AG | 2 |
| Nbr Brands, Inc. | 1 |
| Solbern Inc. | 1 |
| Silicon Neural Ltd. | 1 |
| Confair Carbon Capture Technologies, LLC | 1 |
| Hayward Industries | 1 |
| Zeta Motion Ltd. | 1 |
| Insurance Services Office, Inc. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3678 | 3 |
| 3675 | 1 |
| 3731 | 1 |
| 2847 | 1 |
| 3763 | 1 |
| 1772 | 1 |
| 2454 | 1 |
| 2682 | 1 |
| 2426 | 1 |
| 2425 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19306816 | Convertible Door Handle | Nbr Brands, Inc. | IGNACZEWSKI, JAMES EDWARD | 3675 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 21, 2025 |
| 19086260 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CUTTING FOOD ARTICLES AND FILLING CONTAINERS THEREWITH | Solbern Inc. | WEEKS, GLORIA R | 3731 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 21, 2025 |
| 19107988 | Stand for a Display Screen | Sky Cp Limited | LEA EDMONDS, LISA S | 2847 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 28, 2025 |
| 19051969 | Assessing Spatial Cognition in Human Subjects | Silicon Neural Ltd. | FLETCHER, JERRY-DARYL | 3763 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
| 19047911 | Methods for Petroleum Coke Carbon Capture and Sequestration | Confair Carbon Capture Technologies, LLC | PILCHER, JONATHAN L | 1772 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 07, 2025 |
| 18952333 | System and Method for Dynamic Device Discovery and Address Assignment | Hayward Industries, Inc. | HACKENBERG, RACHEL J | 2454 | §101DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
| 18843987 | Apparatus for Servicing a Structure | Rototech Pte. Ltd. | OQUENDO, CARIB A | 3678 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 04, 2024 |
| 18720492 | AUTOMATED INSPECTION SYSTEM | Zeta Motion Ltd. | HUNTSINGER, PETER K | 2682 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 14, 2024 |
| 18698657 | INTERACTIVE SERVICES | Sky Cp Limited | ALAM, MUSHFIKH I | 2426 | §103 | Final Rejection | 38d overdue | Pending | Apr 04, 2024 |
| 18697366 | MEDIA SUBSTITUTION SYSTEM | Sky Cp Limited | SAINT CYR, JEAN D | 2425 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18689690 | Apparatus for Servicing a Structure | Rototech Pte. Ltd. | TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J | 3678 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 29d | Pending | Mar 06, 2024 |
| 18578701 | Apparatus for Servicing a Structure | Rototech Pte. Ltd. | TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J | 3678 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 11, 2024 |
| 18127414 | Computer Vision Systems and Methods for Property Scene Understanding from Digital Images and Videos | Insurance Services Office, Inc. | O'SHEA, BRENDAN S | 3626 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 87d overdue | Pending | Mar 28, 2023 |
| 17783400 | Assembly of a Containment Means with an Aseptic Working Chamber | Skan AG | FAULKNER, RYAN L | 3762 | §103 | Final Rejection | 73d overdue | Pending | Jun 08, 2022 |
| 17774042 | Arrangement for Monitoring State and Sequence of Movement in an Aseptic Work Chamber of a Containment | Skan AG | ITSKOVICH, MIKHAIL | 2483 | §103 | Final Rejection | 92d overdue | Pending | May 03, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial78.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Mccarter & English, LLP Newark were allowed, across 1,677 applications in USPTO records.
3.09 office actions per allowed application on average.
15 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 10 clients, before 14 examiners in 13 art units.
