Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Miller & Martin Pllc

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 9 clients • 10 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Miller & Martin PLLC specializes in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm has managed 1171 career applications, indicating a strong background in these sectors. Currently, there are 7 pending office actions requiring attention. The 1171 career applications demonstrate a well-established practice with significant experience in handling mechanical and commercial technology patents.

The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 87.78. This high rate of success is achieved with an avg office actions per allowance of 2.67. These metrics demonstrate the firm's effectiveness in securing allowances. The resolved allowance rate pct of 87.78 suggests a very high probability of success for their clients. Additionally, the avg office actions per allowance of 2.67 indicates an efficient prosecution process, typically requiring fewer than three office actions to reach a grant in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1171 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1171
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1171
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=718
-0.40σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=718
941 days
Time to Allowance
n=718
+8.9pp
Interview Lift
n=1171
17.6%
RCE Rate
n=1171
2.4%
Appeal Rate
n=1171

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

66.7%
§101 Overcome
n=39
75.8%
§102 Overcome
n=231
78.8%
§103 Overcome
n=377
83.5%
§112 Overcome
n=322

Specialization & Scale

D05C, Y10T, B65D
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1171
2
Practitioners
n=1171
585.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=1171

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
10% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
3
Business / Other
30% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 1 61.1% +41.6%
CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET 1 57.3% +40.4%
MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 1 30.7% +20.5%
SCHNEIDER, JOSHUA D 1 36.1% +44.6%
NGUYEN, CHI Q 1 82.4% +12.4%
SHIRSAT, VIVEK K 1 74.1% +28.1%
TALLMAN, BRIAN A 1 24.2% +39.0%
COZART, JERMIE E 1 84.0% +3.2%
BARHAM, BETHANY P 1 51.7% +32.1%
COTHRAN, BERNARD E 1 45.2% +15.0%

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18098014 Optimized Topical Formulation for Lidocaine Pain Relief Gel BARHAM, BETHANY P 138d overdue
19044186 AUTOMATED CONSENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SAME SCHNEIDER, JOSHUA D 33d
19237542 Synchronous Grass Tufting Machine LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN —
19105393 Roof Tent, Roof System As Well As Method For Folding A Roof Tent In And Out CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET —
19051377 Artificial Intelligence Text Scheduling Method MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M —
19034028 Sloped Edge On Decorative Articles With A Rigid Base And A Decor That Is Digitally Printed Thereon NGUYEN, CHI Q —
18641778 REFRACTORY INSERT FOR COOKING APPARATUS SHIRSAT, VIVEK K —
18610457 Automated Onboarding Method TALLMAN, BRIAN A —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18098014 Optimized Topical Formulation for Lidocaine Pain Relief Gel BARHAM, BETHANY P 138d overdue
19044186 AUTOMATED CONSENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SAME SCHNEIDER, JOSHUA D 33d
19237542 Synchronous Grass Tufting Machine LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN —
19105393 Roof Tent, Roof System As Well As Method For Folding A Roof Tent In And Out CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET —
19051377 Artificial Intelligence Text Scheduling Method MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M —
19034028 Sloped Edge On Decorative Articles With A Rigid Base And A Decor That Is Digitally Printed Thereon NGUYEN, CHI Q —
18641778 REFRACTORY INSERT FOR COOKING APPARATUS SHIRSAT, VIVEK K —
18610457 Automated Onboarding Method TALLMAN, BRIAN A —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37321
36251
36261
36281
37991
16111
21881

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19237542 Synchronous Grass Tufting Machine Tuftco Comporation LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 3732 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 13, 2025
19105393 Roof Tent, Roof System As Well As Method For Folding A Roof Tent In And Out Vdl Hapro B.V. CHAVCHAVADZE, COLLEEN MARGARET §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 21, 2025
19051377 Artificial Intelligence Text Scheduling Method Financial AI Corp. MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 3625 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 12, 2025
19044186 AUTOMATED CONSENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SAME Rhinogram Inc. SCHNEIDER, JOSHUA D 3626 §101§103Other Final Rejection 33d Pending Feb 03, 2025
19034028 Sloped Edge On Decorative Articles With A Rigid Base And A Decor That Is Digitally Printed Thereon Shaw Industries Group, Inc. NGUYEN, CHI Q §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 22, 2025
18641778 REFRACTORY INSERT FOR COOKING APPARATUS Premier Specialty Brands LLC SHIRSAT, VIVEK K §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 22, 2024
18610457 Automated Onboarding Method Financial AI Corp. TALLMAN, BRIAN A 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 20, 2024
18276720 FLAT CONSTRUCTION ELEMENT, COMPRISING AN INSULATING PANEL, A COVER PLATE AND A MADE-TO-MEASURE DUCT COURSE Rc Panels Holding B.V. COZART, JERMIE E 3799 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 10, 2023
18098014 Optimized Topical Formulation for Lidocaine Pain Relief Gel Focus Consumer Healthcare, LLC BARHAM, BETHANY P 1611 §103§112 Non-Final OA 138d overdue Pending Jan 17, 2023
17903671 SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A STRUCTURE Joulea, LLC COTHRAN, BERNARD E 2188 §101§102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2022

Managing Miller & Martin Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month