Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Mindful Ip Pllc

10 pending office actions • 6 clients • 9 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
7
Medium (70%)
3
Easy (30%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (50%)
§102 only2 (20%)
§112 only3 (30%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
3
Semiconductors
30% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 2 47.7% +34.2%
TRIEU, VAN THANH 1 84.7% +13.5%
LAPAGE, MICHAEL P 1 78.8% +34.2%
HYDER, G.M. ALI 1 90.6% +7.3%
WILSON, LEE D 1 79.9% +18.8%
NOEL, JEMPSON 1 65.0% +35.6%
HELLNER, MARK 1 90.6% +8.3%
CLOUSER, BENJAMIN WADE 1 41.2% +71.4%
LIN, ARIC 1 60.0% +12.9%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18031719 LASER SCANNER HELLNER, MARK 15d overdue
18962419 METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AT LEAST ONE OBJECT ON THE BASIS OF HEIGHT TRIEU, VAN THANH 30d
18798561 NV CENTER BASED MICROWAVE FREE AND GALVANICALLY ISOLATED MAGNETOMETER HYDER, G.M. ALI 33d

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17772228 IMPURITY-CENTER-BASED QUANTUM COMPUTER LIN, ARIC 28d overdue
18285644 SYSTEM FOR MACHINING WORKPIECES, MACHINE TOOL, SUPPORT DEVICE AND WORKPIECE SUPPORT WILSON, LEE D 17d overdue
18038061 LASER SCANNER NOEL, JEMPSON 8d overdue
18128902 METHOD AND A DEVICE FOR EXAMINING THE ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE USING ULTRASONIC SIGNALS ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 9d
18909189 LAYER THICKNESS DETERMINATION BY FOUR-WAVE-MIXING SPECTROSCOPY LAPAGE, MICHAEL P 12d
18962419 METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AT LEAST ONE OBJECT ON THE BASIS OF HEIGHT TRIEU, VAN THANH 30d
18029918 MOBILE SCANNING ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A MOBILE SCANNING ARRANGEMENT CLOUSER, BENJAMIN WADE 33d
18682909 TRILATERATION-BASED ULTRASONIC SENSOR SYSTEM WITH KALMAN FILTERING AND SOLUTION CLUSTERING ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 76d

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36455
26851
28771
28521
37231
28511

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18962419 METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AT LEAST ONE OBJECT ON THE BASIS OF HEIGHT Elmos Semiconductor SE TRIEU, VAN THANH 2685 §112 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Nov 27, 2024
18909189 LAYER THICKNESS DETERMINATION BY FOUR-WAVE-MIXING SPECTROSCOPY Monstr Sense Technologies, LLC LAPAGE, MICHAEL P 2877 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Oct 08, 2024
18798561 NV CENTER BASED MICROWAVE FREE AND GALVANICALLY ISOLATED MAGNETOMETER Quantum Technologies GmbH HYDER, G.M. ALI 2852 §102 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Aug 08, 2024
18682909 TRILATERATION-BASED ULTRASONIC SENSOR SYSTEM WITH KALMAN FILTERING AND SOLUTION CLUSTERING Elmos Semiconductor SE ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 3645 §103 Final Rejection 76d Pending Feb 10, 2024
18285644 SYSTEM FOR MACHINING WORKPIECES, MACHINE TOOL, SUPPORT DEVICE AND WORKPIECE SUPPORT Deckel Maho Pfronten GmbH WILSON, LEE D 3723 §112 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Oct 04, 2023
18038061 LASER SCANNER ZOLLER & FRÖHLICH GMBH NOEL, JEMPSON 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending May 25, 2023
18031719 LASER SCANNER ZOLLER & FRÖHLICH GMBH HELLNER, MARK 3645 §112 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Apr 13, 2023
18029918 MOBILE SCANNING ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A MOBILE SCANNING ARRANGEMENT ZOLLER & FRÖHLICH GMBH CLOUSER, BENJAMIN WADE 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Apr 02, 2023
18128902 METHOD AND A DEVICE FOR EXAMINING THE ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE USING ULTRASONIC SIGNALS Elmos Semiconductor SE ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 3645 §103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Mar 30, 2023
17772228 IMPURITY-CENTER-BASED QUANTUM COMPUTER Quantum Technologies Ug (Haftungsbeschränkt) LIN, ARIC 2851 §102 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending Apr 27, 2022

Managing Mindful Ip Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month