Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Moffat-Rim

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

9 pending office actions • 1 client • 9 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MOFFAT-RIM has 10 pending office actions in Networking & Security and 327 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 86.43%, and the average is 5.55 office actions per allowance.

The record combines current workload with a substantial career application history. The allowance rate describes resolved outcomes, while the office-action average indicates the examination effort associated with allowances in this record.

For practitioners, the data supports a focused assessment of networking and security prosecution experience. The pending docket identifies active matters, and the historical figures provide context for outcome review and expected interaction with examination.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=327 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.4%
Allowance Rate
n=327
+0.45σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=327
5.6
OAs to Allowance
n=223
+1.04σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=223
943 days
Time to Allowance
n=223
+4.4pp
Interview Lift
n=327
55.0%
RCE Rate
n=327
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=327

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

71.7%
§101 Overcome
n=106
81.0%
§102 Overcome
n=121
78.2%
§103 Overcome
n=206
74.4%
§112 Overcome
n=82

Specialization & Scale

H04W, H04L, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
54%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=327
0
Practitioners
n=327
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=327 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (33%)
5
Medium (56%)
1
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (11%)
§101 + other2 (22%)
§103 only5 (56%)
Double-patenting only1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
56% of docket
2
Communications
22% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
22% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRUONG, KARL DUC 1 64.2% +34.0%
GUTMAN, JENNIFER MARIE 1 59.5% +28.8%
POPE, KHARYE 1 66.1% +21.1%
TRAN, JOSHUA VAN 1 100.0% +0.0%
CHOI, JISUN 1 60.5% +61.2%
PATEL, HARESH N 1 77.7% +21.2%
KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE 1 31.8% +46.0%
KHAN, SHER A 1 85.3% +23.5%
FIELDS, COURTNEY D 1 84.0% -3.5%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18100921 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC ACCESS BASED ON GRANTED PERMISSIONS FIELDS, COURTNEY D 28d
18120177 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTRUSION DETECTION FOR AN IN-VEHICLE INFOTAINMENT SYSTEM KHAN, SHER A —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18768876 SYNTHETIC SENSOR VALIDATION FOR DEPLOYMENT IN VEHICLES GUTMAN, JENNIFER MARIE —
18422566 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC AND AUTOMATIC DEVELOPMENT CONFIGURATION FOR A VEHICLE TRAN, JOSHUA VAN —
18128116 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BULK ASSET LEASING KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18356397 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADDITION OF ASSURANCE INFORMATION TO V2X MESSAGING PATEL, HARESH N 23d
18960592 ANGULAR PRIOR AND DIRECT CODING MODE FOR TREE REPRESENTATION CODING OF A POINT CLOUD TRUONG, KARL DUC —
18768876 SYNTHETIC SENSOR VALIDATION FOR DEPLOYMENT IN VEHICLES GUTMAN, JENNIFER MARIE —
18637843 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CLOUD EXTENDED ATTRIBUTE PROFILE POPE, KHARYE —
18499741 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DECOUPLING CHARGING SIGNALS FROM BATTERY SIGNALS CHOI, JISUN —
18128116 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BULK ASSET LEASING KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE —
18120177 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTRUSION DETECTION FOR AN IN-VEHICLE INFOTAINMENT SYSTEM KHAN, SHER A —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
BlackBerry Limited 9

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26141
21941
26931
21921
36661
24961
36261
24971
24361

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18960592 ANGULAR PRIOR AND DIRECT CODING MODE FOR TREE REPRESENTATION CODING OF A POINT CLOUD Blackberry Limited TRUONG, KARL DUC 2614 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18768876 SYNTHETIC SENSOR VALIDATION FOR DEPLOYMENT IN VEHICLES Blackberry Limited GUTMAN, JENNIFER MARIE 2194 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 10, 2024
18637843 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CLOUD EXTENDED ATTRIBUTE PROFILE Blackberry Limited POPE, KHARYE 2693 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 17, 2024
18422566 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC AND AUTOMATIC DEVELOPMENT CONFIGURATION FOR A VEHICLE Blackberry Limited TRAN, JOSHUA VAN 2192 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 25, 2024
18499741 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DECOUPLING CHARGING SIGNALS FROM BATTERY SIGNALS Blackberry Limited CHOI, JISUN 3666 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 01, 2023
18356397 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADDITION OF ASSURANCE INFORMATION TO V2X MESSAGING Blackberry Limited PATEL, HARESH N 2496 §103 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Jul 21, 2023
18128116 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BULK ASSET LEASING Blackberry Limited KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE 3626 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 29, 2023
18120177 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTRUSION DETECTION FOR AN IN-VEHICLE INFOTAINMENT SYSTEM Blackberry Limited KHAN, SHER A 2497 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 10, 2023
18100921 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC ACCESS BASED ON GRANTED PERMISSIONS Blackberry Limited FIELDS, COURTNEY D 2436 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jan 24, 2023

Managing Moffat-Rim's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Moffat-Rim's patent allowance rate?

86.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Moffat-Rim were allowed, across 327 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Moffat-Rim average before allowance?

5.55 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Moffat-Rim have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 9 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month