Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Murthy Patent Law Inc. operates as a patent law firm within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The firm has managed 99 career applications, providing a base of experience in this technical field. It maintains a resolved allowance rate of 75.0 percent, which serves as an indicator of its historical results in securing patent grants. This performance is achieved with an average of 2.1 office actions per allowance, offering a benchmark for the expected effort of the examination process.
The firm currently has 5 pending office actions across its active portfolio. Practitioners can evaluate the 75.0 percent allowance rate alongside the 99 career applications to understand the firm's performance trends in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The average of 2.1 office actions per allowance serves as a metric for estimating the timeline required for prosecution. With 5 pending office actions, the firm remains actively engaged in navigating the requirements of the patent office. These data points collectively illustrate the firm's presence in the biotechnology sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (20%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBERTS, LEZAH | 1 | 48.4% | +35.1% |
| EDWARDS, MARIA J | 1 | 95.4% | +5.0% |
| ALAM, SHAHID AL | 1 | 87.8% | +14.7% |
| WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE | 1 | 73.3% | +30.4% |
| SHARPLESS, CHRISTEN ALICIA | 1 | 50.4% | +27.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35523673 | Boxing glove with grip bar | EDWARDS, MARIA J | 29d |
| 18868420 | A method to provide comprehensive key vocabulary for search | ALAM, SHAHID AL | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18273776 | BUILDING MODULES AND TECHNIQUES TO MAKE THEM | WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE | — |
| 17761658 | An external endoluminal fixator device | SHARPLESS, CHRISTEN ALICIA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19055744 | Composition for the control of oral malodor compounds | ROBERTS, LEZAH | 72d overdue |
| 18868420 | A method to provide comprehensive key vocabulary for search | ALAM, SHAHID AL | — |
| 18273776 | BUILDING MODULES AND TECHNIQUES TO MAKE THEM | WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE | — |
| 17761658 | An external endoluminal fixator device | SHARPLESS, CHRISTEN ALICIA | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Helix | 1 |
| Boxraw Limited | 1 |
| M/S. Bdsr Solutions LLP | 1 |
| EARTHBUILT TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD | 1 |
| Ravita Srivastava | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1612 | 1 |
| 2911 | 1 |
| 2161 | 1 |
| 3635 | 1 |
| 3795 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19055744 | Composition for the control of oral malodor compounds | Helix Science LLC | ROBERTS, LEZAH | 1612 | §103§112DP | Final Rejection | 72d overdue | Pending | Feb 18, 2025 |
| 35523673 | Boxing glove with grip bar | Boxraw Limited | EDWARDS, MARIA J | 2911 | §112 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Dec 04, 2024 |
| 18868420 | A method to provide comprehensive key vocabulary for search | M/S. Bdsr Solutions LLP | ALAM, SHAHID AL | 2161 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 22, 2024 |
| 18273776 | BUILDING MODULES AND TECHNIQUES TO MAKE THEM | Earthbuilt Technology Pty Ltd. | WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE | 3635 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 24, 2023 |
| 17761658 | An external endoluminal fixator device | Ravita Srivastava | SHARPLESS, CHRISTEN ALICIA | 3795 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial