Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Neustel Law Offices, Ltd.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

9 pending office actions • 8 clients • 9 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

NEUSTEL LAW OFFICES, LTD. has 8 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 1,805 career applications. The profile pairs a contained active workload with a substantial historical application record.

The resolved allowance rate is 92.03%, and the average office actions per allowance is 2.08. The allowance result indicates that most resolved matters reached allowance, while the action average points to relatively focused prosecution in matters that ultimately allowed.

For practitioners, the profile supports reviewing how device claims were positioned early in examination and how technical distinctions were preserved through response practice. The pending matters should still be evaluated separately, since historical outcomes do not resolve the issues in the current docket.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1805 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.0%
Allowance Rate
n=1805
+0.73σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1805
2.1
OAs to Allowance
n=1167
-0.70σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1167
711 days
Time to Allowance
n=1167
+4.9pp
Interview Lift
n=1805
9.5%
RCE Rate
n=1805
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=1805

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

83.7%
§101 Overcome
n=49
87.0%
§102 Overcome
n=424
86.2%
§103 Overcome
n=560
85.0%
§112 Overcome
n=320

Specialization & Scale

A63B, Y10T, B65G
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1805
1
Practitioners
n=1805
1805.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1805

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (11%)
2
Easy (22%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (22%)
§103 only1 (11%)
§112 only2 (22%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (44%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
11% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
78% of docket
1
Business / Other
11% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D 1 73.4% +60.5%
ALTER MORSCHAUSER, ALYSSA MARGO 1 76.6% +15.7%
CHEN, VIVIAN 1 56.6% +28.5%
SINGH, KAVEL 1 83.7% +14.0%
GALKA, LAWRENCE STEFAN 1 76.9% +18.3%
ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 1 29.7% +57.2%
JIMENEZ, LOAN B 1 5.8% +1.9%
MOSS, JAMES R 1 51.1% +41.6%
THAKUR, VIREN A 1 13.3% +26.5%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18479503 Livestock Weighing and Isolation System ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 11d overdue
18354053 Rower Accessory System for Exercise Machine JIMENEZ, LOAN B 12d
17845513 Microwave Food Container THAKUR, VIREN A 29d
19052939 Method and System for Automated Neuromodulation through Machine Learning ALTER MORSCHAUSER, ALYSSA MARGO —
19047756 Cleanup Conveyor System SINGH, KAVEL —
18069302 INTRAORAL MONITORING DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD MOSS, JAMES R —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18479503 Livestock Weighing and Isolation System ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 11d overdue
17845513 Microwave Food Container THAKUR, VIREN A 29d
19200940 Shrouded Exercise Spring Assemblies URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D —
19052939 Method and System for Automated Neuromodulation through Machine Learning ALTER MORSCHAUSER, ALYSSA MARGO —
19047824 Composition and Method to Form a Composite Core Material CHEN, VIVIAN —
19047756 Cleanup Conveyor System SINGH, KAVEL —
18967992 Golf Swing Analyzer System GALKA, LAWRENCE STEFAN —
18069302 INTRAORAL MONITORING DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD MOSS, JAMES R —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37842
37961
36511
37151
36431
37921
17921

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19200940 Shrouded Exercise Spring Assemblies Lagree Technologies, Inc. URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D 3784 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2025
19052939 Method and System for Automated Neuromodulation through Machine Learning Soin Neuroscience, LLC ALTER MORSCHAUSER, ALYSSA MARGO 3796 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 13, 2025
19047824 Composition and Method to Form a Composite Core Material Composite Technologies International, LLC CHEN, VIVIAN §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 07, 2025
19047756 Cleanup Conveyor System Kringstad Ironworks, Inc. SINGH, KAVEL 3651 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 07, 2025
18967992 Golf Swing Analyzer System Bwr Innovations LLC GALKA, LAWRENCE STEFAN 3715 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2024
18479503 Livestock Weighing and Isolation System 701X Inc. ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 3643 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending Oct 02, 2023
18354053 Rower Accessory System for Exercise Machine Lagree Technologies, Inc. JIMENEZ, LOAN B 3784 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Jul 18, 2023
18069302 INTRAORAL MONITORING DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD Dianyx Innovations, LLC MOSS, JAMES R 3792 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 21, 2022
17845513 Microwave Food Container Inline Packaging, LLC THAKUR, VIREN A 1792 §103§112 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Jun 21, 2022

Managing Neustel Law Offices, Ltd.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Neustel Law Offices, Ltd.'s patent allowance rate?

92.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Neustel Law Offices, Ltd. were allowed, across 1,805 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Neustel Law Offices, Ltd. average before allowance?

2.08 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Neustel Law Offices, Ltd. have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 9 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month