Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nexus Law Group LLP

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

NEXUS LAW GROUP LLP records 6 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 431 career applications. The profile combines a contained active docket with a focused historical application record.

The resolved allowance rate is 81.38%, and the average office actions per allowance is 2.66. The allowance figure indicates that a substantial portion of resolved matters reached allowance, while the action average reflects recurring examination work in matters that allowed.

For practitioners, the data supports reviewing claim treatment across physical systems and commerce-related functionality. Individual file histories can clarify whether successful prosecution depended on structural limitations, operational details, technical evidence, or amendments addressing prior-art concerns.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=431 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.4%
Allowance Rate
n=431
+0.43σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=431
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=271
-0.36σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=271
1012 days
Time to Allowance
n=271
+14.2pp
Interview Lift
n=431
13.5%
RCE Rate
n=431
5.0%
Appeal Rate
n=431

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=12 (min 20)
73.0%
§102 Overcome
n=137
74.6%
§103 Overcome
n=197
78.9%
§112 Overcome
n=123

Specialization & Scale

B65D, A62C, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
6%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=431
2
Practitioners
n=431
215.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=431

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only3 (43%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALVESTEFFER, STEPHEN D 2 57.3% +24.6%
KWIATKOWSKA, LIDIA 1 68.9% +20.2%
BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 1 65.6% +14.9%
TEMPLETON, CHRISTOPHER L 1 50.8% +56.0%
TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 1 65.7% +27.8%
HIJAZ, OMAR F 1 55.5% +35.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18204353 FORMWORK SYSTEM AND A METHOD OF FORMING A WALL HIJAZ, OMAR F 147d overdue
19211812 SAFETY SYSTEM FOR MACHINERY KWIATKOWSKA, LIDIA —
18821131 ROTARY DRAW MACHINE TEMPLETON, CHRISTOPHER L —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18204353 FORMWORK SYSTEM AND A METHOD OF FORMING A WALL HIJAZ, OMAR F 147d overdue
19211812 SAFETY SYSTEM FOR MACHINERY KWIATKOWSKA, LIDIA —
18936313 MODULAR BUILDING SYSTEM AND A PLURALITY OF MATING MODULES THEREOF BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —
18884432 ARTICLE HAVING A REUSABLE WRITING SURFACE ALVESTEFFER, STEPHEN D —
18821131 ROTARY DRAW MACHINE TEMPLETON, CHRISTOPHER L —
18767676 WORKBOOK ALVESTEFFER, STEPHEN D —
18275973 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DRYING SLUDGE TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37152
36661
36331
37251
37621
36351

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19211812 SAFETY SYSTEM FOR MACHINERY Spec. Control Systems Ltd. KWIATKOWSKA, LIDIA 3666 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 19, 2025
18936313 MODULAR BUILDING SYSTEM AND A PLURALITY OF MATING MODULES THEREOF Qube Building Systems Inc. BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 3633 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 04, 2024
18884432 ARTICLE HAVING A REUSABLE WRITING SURFACE Wipebook Corp. ALVESTEFFER, STEPHEN D 3715 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18821131 ROTARY DRAW MACHINE Arma Automotive Inc. TEMPLETON, CHRISTOPHER L 3725 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18767676 WORKBOOK Wipebook Corp. ALVESTEFFER, STEPHEN D 3715 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 09, 2024
18275973 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DRYING SLUDGE Iq Energy Inc. TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 3762 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 04, 2023
18204353 FORMWORK SYSTEM AND A METHOD OF FORMING A WALL Earth House Holding Ltd. HIJAZ, OMAR F 3635 §103§112 Non-Final OA 147d overdue Pending May 31, 2023

Managing Nexus Law Group LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nexus Law Group LLP's patent allowance rate?

81.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Nexus Law Group LLP were allowed, across 431 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Nexus Law Group LLP average before allowance?

2.66 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Nexus Law Group LLP have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month