Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Noblitt & Newson, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Communications

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

NOBLITT & NEWSON, PLLC operates in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has managed 970 career applications and currently oversees 3 pending office actions. These figures indicate the firm's historical experience and its current level of engagement with the USPTO. This data provides a baseline for understanding the firm's presence in this sector.

The firm's resolved allowance rate is 83.44. On average, the firm receives 3.28 office actions per allowance. Practitioners can use this average to estimate the frequency of examiner interactions required to reach a grant for applications in this portfolio. These metrics offer an overview of the firm's prosecution results.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=970 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.4%
Allowance Rate
n=970
+0.65σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=970
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=509
-0.17σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=509
1017 days
Time to Allowance
n=509
+11.2pp
Interview Lift
n=970
16.2%
RCE Rate
n=970
5.0%
Appeal Rate
n=970

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.9%
§101 Overcome
n=108
81.2%
§102 Overcome
n=250
80.8%
§103 Overcome
n=380
80.2%
§112 Overcome
n=257

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, A61F
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=970
0
Practitioners
n=970
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=970 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
4
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BROWN, VERNAL U 1 69.6% +13.5%
DAVISON, KATHLEEN GAGE 1 66.6% +37.6%
MINTZ, RODNEY K 1 79.0% +10.7%
SNOW, BRUCE EDWARD 1 75.4% +8.0%
QURESHI, REHMAN AHMED 1 100.0% +0.0%
KARST, DAVID THOMAS 1 64.7% +9.8%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19268892 Methods and Apparatus for Pet Doors BROWN, VERNAL U —
19187853 ELECTRONIC GREETING CARD SYSTEM AND METHOD DAVISON, KATHLEEN GAGE —
19088026 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CASTELLATED EXTRUDED MULLION MINTZ, RODNEY K —
18911636 MICROPROCESSOR CONTROLLED PROSTHETIC ANKLE SYSTEM FOR FOOTWEAR AND TERRAIN ADAPTATION SNOW, BRUCE EDWARD —
18358290 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LIFTING AND HANDLING MECHANISM FOR CRYOGENIC SPECIMENS QURESHI, REHMAN AHMED —
18090881 METHODS AND PREPARATION FOR HEMP BIODEGRADABLE ABSORBENT KARST, DAVID THOMAS —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19268892 Methods and Apparatus for Pet Doors BROWN, VERNAL U —
19187853 ELECTRONIC GREETING CARD SYSTEM AND METHOD DAVISON, KATHLEEN GAGE —
19088026 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CASTELLATED EXTRUDED MULLION MINTZ, RODNEY K —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26861
41001
17671

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19268892 Methods and Apparatus for Pet Doors Smartec Products LLC BROWN, VERNAL U 2686 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 14, 2025
19187853 ELECTRONIC GREETING CARD SYSTEM AND METHOD Ink'D Greetings, Inc. DAVISON, KATHLEEN GAGE §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2025
19088026 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CASTELLATED EXTRUDED MULLION Innovation Glass, LLC MINTZ, RODNEY K §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 24, 2025
18911636 MICROPROCESSOR CONTROLLED PROSTHETIC ANKLE SYSTEM FOR FOOTWEAR AND TERRAIN ADAPTATION Proteor Usa, LLC SNOW, BRUCE EDWARD §102§103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Oct 10, 2024
18358290 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LIFTING AND HANDLING MECHANISM FOR CRYOGENIC SPECIMENS Alcor Life Extension Foundation QURESHI, REHMAN AHMED 4100 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2023
18090881 METHODS AND PREPARATION FOR HEMP BIODEGRADABLE ABSORBENT Organa Dry LLC KARST, DAVID THOMAS 1767 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 29, 2022

Managing Noblitt & Newson, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month