Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Ogc Law, LLC

7 pending office actions • 7 clients • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=121 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

94.9%
Allowance Rate
n=121
+0.63σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=121
2.0
OAs to Allowance
n=74
-0.90σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=74
755 days
Time to Allowance
n=74
-7.8pp
Interview Lift
n=121
18.0%
RCE Rate
n=121
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=121

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=9 (min 20)
70.0%
§102 Overcome
n=30
80.4%
§103 Overcome
n=46
72.1%
§112 Overcome
n=43

Specialization & Scale

G01N, G01M, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=121
1
Practitioners
n=121
121.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=121

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
1
Medium (14%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (57%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
43% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAGEMAN, MARK C 1 74.0% +15.7%
PAGAN, JAVIER A 1 68.9% +24.5%
BUSHEY, CHARLES S 1 75.6% +21.9%
HABTE, KAHSAY 1 85.1% +7.3%
GLENN, KIMBERLY E 1 89.6% +6.8%
CORNETT, ROBERT D 1 40.0% +43.7%
LEE, HOI YAN NMN 1 41.0% +79.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274476 PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRICAL BYPASS GLENN, KIMBERLY E 74d overdue

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18277793 DEVICE FOR PURIFYING AN AIR-WATER CURRENT BUSHEY, CHARLES S 24d overdue
18266410 Shaving Apparatus CORNETT, ROBERT D 18d overdue
18278192 A PROPYL PROPANE THIOSULFONATE COMPOUND FOR USE AS ANTITUMORAL HABTE, KAHSAY 6d
18870281 SELF-LOADING ASSEMBLY AND VEHICLE INCLUDING SUCH SELF-LOADING ASSEMBLY HAGEMAN, MARK C
18857854 Container PAGAN, JAVIER A

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18277793 DEVICE FOR PURIFYING AN AIR-WATER CURRENT BUSHEY, CHARLES S 24d overdue
18266410 Shaving Apparatus CORNETT, ROBERT D 18d overdue
18870281 SELF-LOADING ASSEMBLY AND VEHICLE INCLUDING SUCH SELF-LOADING ASSEMBLY HAGEMAN, MARK C
18857854 Container PAGAN, JAVIER A
18020646 A NON-AQUEOUS SUSPENSION OF ANTICANCER AGENT LEE, HOI YAN NMN

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37351
17761
16241
28431
37241
16931

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18870281 SELF-LOADING ASSEMBLY AND VEHICLE INCLUDING SUCH SELF-LOADING ASSEMBLY Quantum Bodies Ip Pty Ltd. HAGEMAN, MARK C §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 27, 2024
18857854 Container Wholly Shrink! Pty Ltd. PAGAN, JAVIER A 3735 §102§112 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 18, 2024
18277793 DEVICE FOR PURIFYING AN AIR-WATER CURRENT Wingscompany, S.L. BUSHEY, CHARLES S 1776 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 24d overdue Pending Dec 28, 2023
18278192 A PROPYL PROPANE THIOSULFONATE COMPOUND FOR USE AS ANTITUMORAL Dmc Research Center, Sl HABTE, KAHSAY 1624 §102§112 Final Rejection 6d Pending Aug 22, 2023
18274476 PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRICAL BYPASS Dario Maximilian Spera GLENN, KIMBERLY E 2843 §112 Non-Final OA 74d overdue Pending Jul 27, 2023
18266410 Shaving Apparatus Willis Tribe Pty Ltd. CORNETT, ROBERT D 3724 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 18d overdue Pending Jun 09, 2023
18020646 A NON-AQUEOUS SUSPENSION OF ANTICANCER AGENT Auxilla Pharmaceuticals and Research LLP LEE, HOI YAN NMN 1693 §103 Final Rejection Pending Feb 10, 2023

Managing Ogc Law, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month