Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Opes Ip Consulting Co., Ltd.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Opes IP Consulting Co., Ltd. handles Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals matters, with 8 pending office actions and 246 career applications. The resolved allowance rate is 84.92%, meaning that the recorded resolved applications reached allowance in a clear majority of cases.

The average of 3.14 office actions per allowance indicates that prosecution typically involves several office-action events before allowance. Counsel can use that measure when planning amendment cycles, while the pending docket identifies the immediate set of matters requiring attention.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=246 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.9%
Allowance Rate
n=246
+0.68σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=246
3.1
OAs to Allowance
n=107
-0.26σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=107
1008 days
Time to Allowance
n=107
+11.4pp
Interview Lift
n=246
26.2%
RCE Rate
n=246
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=246

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

71.4%
§101 Overcome
n=21
75.5%
§102 Overcome
n=49
72.0%
§103 Overcome
n=82
75.4%
§112 Overcome
n=65

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, A61M
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=246
0
Practitioners
n=246
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=246 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (17%)
3
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (17%)
1
Unknown (17%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (50%)
Double-patenting only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)
No statute on record1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
50% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LARKIN, DANIEL SEAN 1 82.7% +7.9%
TRAN, TAM T 1 81.1% +11.6%
HEGEMIER, JON MICHAEL 1 — —
YOUTCHOM PENDIE, EMMANUEL LED 1 64.3% +41.7%
JACOBSON, SARAH JORDAN 1 51.9% +76.5%
KNIGHT, TERESA E 1 66.1% +48.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18809950 METHOD, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR MODIFYING PAGES OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT TRAN, TAM T —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17623250 COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR RENDERING BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL KNIGHT, TERESA E 380d overdue

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17623250 COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR RENDERING BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL KNIGHT, TERESA E 380d overdue
18809950 METHOD, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR MODIFYING PAGES OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT TRAN, TAM T —
18259277 GLOBO SERIES ANTIGENS-BINDING CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTORS AND USES THEREOF YOUTCHOM PENDIE, EMMANUEL LED —
17939487 BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY SYSTEM JACOBSON, SARAH JORDAN —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28551
21741
37231
16471
17851
16341

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18844400 MATERIAL MONITORING SYSTEM AND USES THEREOF E-Fuji Company Ltd. LARKIN, DANIEL SEAN 2855 — Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18809950 METHOD, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR MODIFYING PAGES OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT Kdan Mobile Software Ltd. TRAN, TAM T 2174 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 20, 2024
18736551 Automated Self-Cleaning Skylight Tanaphat Leeruangariya HEGEMIER, JON MICHAEL 3723 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2024
18259277 GLOBO SERIES ANTIGENS-BINDING CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTORS AND USES THEREOF Obi Pharma, Inc. YOUTCHOM PENDIE, EMMANUEL LED 1647 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 26, 2023
17939487 BATTERY MODULE AND BATTERY SYSTEM Xing Power Inc. JACOBSON, SARAH JORDAN 1785 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 07, 2022
17623250 COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR RENDERING BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL Jellox Biotech Inc. KNIGHT, TERESA E 1634 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 380d overdue Pending Dec 28, 2021

Managing Opes Ip Consulting Co., Ltd.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Opes Ip Consulting Co., Ltd.'s patent allowance rate?

84.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Opes Ip Consulting Co., Ltd. were allowed, across 246 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Opes Ip Consulting Co., Ltd. average before allowance?

3.14 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Opes Ip Consulting Co., Ltd. have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month