Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ortiz & Lopez, Pllc

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

13 pending office actions • 12 clients • 13 examiners • 12 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ortiz & Lopez, PLLC handles Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems matters, with 14 pending office actions and 961 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 82.17%, indicating allowance in most resolved applications in the supplied record.

The average of 3.61 office actions per allowance indicates that several examination events commonly precede allowance. The historical record can inform response planning, while the pending docket requires continued attention to deadlines, claim amendments, and unresolved examiner positions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=961 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.2%
Allowance Rate
n=961
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=961
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=484
+0.13σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=484
1029 days
Time to Allowance
n=484
+14.5pp
Interview Lift
n=961
24.4%
RCE Rate
n=961
3.3%
Appeal Rate
n=961

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

74.6%
§101 Overcome
n=122
78.3%
§102 Overcome
n=230
79.2%
§103 Overcome
n=355
75.6%
§112 Overcome
n=238

Specialization & Scale

H04L, G06F, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
18%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=961
4
Practitioners
n=961
240.2
Apps / Practitioner
n=961

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (62%)
2
Medium (15%)
3
Easy (23%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (15%)
§103 only1 (8%)
§102 only1 (8%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting only2 (15%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (46%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
8% of docket
1
Information Tech
8% of docket
1
Communications
8% of docket
3
Semiconductors
23% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
54% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
REVAK, CHRISTOPHER A 1 89.2% +8.8%
KENNY, DANIEL J 1 61.8% +21.6%
LANE, NICHOLAS J 1 65.8% +6.9%
CICCHINO, PATRICK D 1 80.5% +13.5%
GEISBERT, WILLIAM ADDISON 1 38.5% +51.4%
RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE 1 77.8% +7.7%
HULBERT, AMANDA K 1 84.7% +4.2%
FERENCE, JAMES M 1 71.2% +16.8%
KOUSAR, SADIA 1 65.9% +10.9%
PACHECO, ALEXIS BOATENG 1 77.7% +12.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18594416 SYSTEMS, METHODS AND DEVICES FOR BIOELECTRONIC NEUROCODE-BASED MEDICAL TREATMENT HULBERT, AMANDA K 12d
19004145 BLOCKCHAIN-BASED COMMERCIAL INVENTORY SYSTEMS AND METHODS REVAK, CHRISTOPHER A —

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18093325 INDUCTIVE CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES FROM A SERVICE VEHICLE PACHECO, ALEXIS BOATENG 38d overdue
18818437 DRIVER SIDE BRAKE CONTROLLER CICCHINO, PATRICK D 71d
18854538 WIND TURBINE TOWER DETACHABLE SELF ERECTING SYSTEM FOR ALL WIND TURBINE COMPONENTS KENNY, DANIEL J —
18847593 PROGRESSIVE-DISPLACEMENT NITROGEN SHOCK ABSORBER AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF LANE, NICHOLAS J —
18661101 ASPHALT IMPRINTING SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR CREATING A MUSICAL ROAD RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE —
18272181 INDUCTIVE CHARGING SYSTEM FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES KOUSAR, SADIA —
17855016 DIGITIZED VOICE ALERTS FAN, CHIEH M —
16789885 AUTOMATED MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT TRANSACTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS MILLER, JAMES H —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18093325 INDUCTIVE CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES FROM A SERVICE VEHICLE PACHECO, ALEXIS BOATENG 38d overdue
18379556 HOUSING INCLUDING ROOF ADAPTED FOR UPWARD EXPANSION BY OPERATION OF A MECHANIZED LIFT FERENCE, JAMES M 35d
18818437 DRIVER SIDE BRAKE CONTROLLER CICCHINO, PATRICK D 71d
18854538 WIND TURBINE TOWER DETACHABLE SELF ERECTING SYSTEM FOR ALL WIND TURBINE COMPONENTS KENNY, DANIEL J —
18800062 FLOATING OBJECT CLEANUP DEVICE GEISBERT, WILLIAM ADDISON —
18272181 INDUCTIVE CHARGING SYSTEM FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES KOUSAR, SADIA —

Client Portfolio (12 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28592
24071
36331
36161
36191
17791
36711
37921
36351
26321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19004145 BLOCKCHAIN-BASED COMMERCIAL INVENTORY SYSTEMS AND METHODS Americorp Investments LLC REVAK, CHRISTOPHER A 2407 DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 27, 2024
18854538 WIND TURBINE TOWER DETACHABLE SELF ERECTING SYSTEM FOR ALL WIND TURBINE COMPONENTS Cls Wind LLC KENNY, DANIEL J 3633 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18847593 PROGRESSIVE-DISPLACEMENT NITROGEN SHOCK ABSORBER AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF Jiangsu Koman Saite Shock Absorber Co., Ltd. LANE, NICHOLAS J 3616 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 16, 2024
18818437 DRIVER SIDE BRAKE CONTROLLER Driving Success, Inc. CICCHINO, PATRICK D 3619 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 71d Pending Aug 28, 2024
18800062 FLOATING OBJECT CLEANUP DEVICE Zhejiang Coolkind Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. GEISBERT, WILLIAM ADDISON 1779 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 10, 2024
18661101 ASPHALT IMPRINTING SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR CREATING A MUSICAL ROAD Sanbar Construction Corp. RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE 3671 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 10, 2024
18594416 SYSTEMS, METHODS AND DEVICES FOR BIOELECTRONIC NEUROCODE-BASED MEDICAL TREATMENT Electroceuticals, LLC HULBERT, AMANDA K 3792 DP Final Rejection 12d Pending Mar 04, 2024
18379556 HOUSING INCLUDING ROOF ADAPTED FOR UPWARD EXPANSION BY OPERATION OF A MECHANIZED LIFT Vasconi Ventures LLC FERENCE, JAMES M 3635 §103 Non-Final OA 35d Pending Oct 12, 2023
18272181 INDUCTIVE CHARGING SYSTEM FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES Ev Charging Solutions LLC KOUSAR, SADIA 2859 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 13, 2023
18093325 INDUCTIVE CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES FROM A SERVICE VEHICLE Ev Charging Solutions LLC PACHECO, ALEXIS BOATENG 2859 §102§103 Final Rejection 38d overdue Pending Jan 05, 2023
17855016 DIGITIZED VOICE ALERTS Verna Ip Holdings, LLC FAN, CHIEH M 2632 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 30, 2022
17459389 TOPOLOGIES OF UNIT CROSSBARS Knowm, Inc. PAYEN, MARVIN 2899 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2021
16789885 AUTOMATED MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT TRANSACTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS Mvd Specialists, LLC MILLER, JAMES H 3694 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 13, 2020

Managing Ortiz & Lopez, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ortiz & Lopez, Pllc's patent allowance rate?

82.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ortiz & Lopez, Pllc were allowed, across 961 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ortiz & Lopez, Pllc average before allowance?

3.61 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ortiz & Lopez, Pllc have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 12 clients, before 13 examiners in 12 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month