Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Parsons Behle and Latimer

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Parsons Behle & Latimer manages a portfolio of 888 career applications, primarily focused on the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 82.96 percent. This success rate is achieved with an average of 3.02 office actions per allowance, indicating the level of examiner interaction required for each granted patent.

Currently, the firm has 3 pending office actions. This number of active responses suggests a phase of prosecution activity relative to the 888 career applications. Practitioners can view the 3.02 average office actions per allowance as a benchmark for the typical duration of prosecution cycles at this firm. The 82.96 percent resolved allowance rate reflects the firm's historical performance in securing patent rights within the Chemistry & Materials sector. With 888 career applications, the firm demonstrates experience in navigating the requirements of this technical field. The presence of 3 pending office actions indicates that a portion of the firm's workload is in the active response stage.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=888 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.0%
Allowance Rate
n=888
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=888
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=521
-0.16σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=521
980 days
Time to Allowance
n=521
+14.2pp
Interview Lift
n=888
18.0%
RCE Rate
n=888
3.3%
Appeal Rate
n=888

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

78.7%
§101 Overcome
n=47
85.3%
§102 Overcome
n=265
81.7%
§103 Overcome
n=366
81.7%
§112 Overcome
n=202

Specialization & Scale

Y10T, F41A, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
10%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=888
7
Practitioners
n=888
126.9
Apps / Practitioner
n=888

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EDWARDS, MARK 1 76.3% +13.3%
CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J 1 65.1% +35.7%
PHAN, MINH Q 1 75.8% -4.7%
CALANDRA, ANTHONY J 1 62.8% +18.7%
DANG, CHRISTINE 1 50.0% +51.1%
RANEW, BENJAMIN THOMAS 1 90.9% +14.3%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19240603 SUPPLEMENTAL DISPLAY FOR INTERACTIVE CONTENT EDWARDS, MARK 16d overdue
19201721 COMPRESSION-RESISTANT THIN-WALL CONTAINER CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J —
19075570 ELECTRODE AND SHIELDING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPLIANT SENSORS PHAN, MINH Q —
18730098 THERMAL-PRESSURE HYDROLYSIS SUSTAINABLE BIOMASS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALTERNATIVE PROTEINS AND BIO-MATERIALS CALANDRA, ANTHONY J —
18416181 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DLT-ENABLED DIGITIZED TOKENS FOR CARBON CREDITS DANG, CHRISTINE —
17816896 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BANDWIDTH ADAPTIVE SCHEDULING IN CLOUD BASED VIRTUAL NETWORK FUNCTIONS FOR TRAFFIC OVER POINT-TO-POINT OVERLAY TUNNELS RANEW, BENJAMIN THOMAS —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19240603 SUPPLEMENTAL DISPLAY FOR INTERACTIVE CONTENT EDWARDS, MARK 16d overdue
19201721 COMPRESSION-RESISTANT THIN-WALL CONTAINER CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J —
18730098 THERMAL-PRESSURE HYDROLYSIS SUSTAINABLE BIOMASS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALTERNATIVE PROTEINS AND BIO-MATERIALS CALANDRA, ANTHONY J —
18416181 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DLT-ENABLED DIGITIZED TOKENS FOR CARBON CREDITS DANG, CHRISTINE —
17816896 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BANDWIDTH ADAPTIVE SCHEDULING IN CLOUD BASED VIRTUAL NETWORK FUNCTIONS FOR TRAFFIC OVER POINT-TO-POINT OVERLAY TUNNELS RANEW, BENJAMIN THOMAS —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26241
37331
17481
36981
24651

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19240603 SUPPLEMENTAL DISPLAY FOR INTERACTIVE CONTENT Innovative Point Of Sale Systems, LLC EDWARDS, MARK 2624 §102§103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Jun 17, 2025
19201721 COMPRESSION-RESISTANT THIN-WALL CONTAINER BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J 3733 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2025
19075570 ELECTRODE AND SHIELDING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPLIANT SENSORS Nitto Bend Technologies, Inc. PHAN, MINH Q §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 10, 2025
18730098 THERMAL-PRESSURE HYDROLYSIS SUSTAINABLE BIOMASS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALTERNATIVE PROTEINS AND BIO-MATERIALS Thermo Pressure Technologies Limited CALANDRA, ANTHONY J 1748 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2024
18416181 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DLT-ENABLED DIGITIZED TOKENS FOR CARBON CREDITS Dynamis Energy, LLC DANG, CHRISTINE 3698 §103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Jan 18, 2024
17816896 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BANDWIDTH ADAPTIVE SCHEDULING IN CLOUD BASED VIRTUAL NETWORK FUNCTIONS FOR TRAFFIC OVER POINT-TO-POINT OVERLAY TUNNELS Cradlepoint, Inc. RANEW, BENJAMIN THOMAS 2465 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 02, 2022

Managing Parsons Behle and Latimer's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month