Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Patent Capital Group

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications

14 pending office actions • 7 clients • 13 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 26 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

PATENT CAPITAL GROUP manages 650 career applications in the Networking & Security technology area. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 92.96 percent. The prosecution process averages 3.8 office actions per allowance, showing the level of effort to secure these grants.

There are 7 pending office actions currently being handled. This active docket contributes to the firm's overall experience with 650 career applications. The 92.96 percent resolved allowance rate highlights the firm's effectiveness in its primary technology area. The 3.8 average office actions per allowance provides an expectation for the duration of the examination phase. This firm demonstrates a 92.96 percent success rate in Networking & Security, supported by its prosecution approach. With 7 pending office actions, the firm remains engaged in active matters, building on its history of 650 career applications. The 92.96 percent resolved allowance rate is a performance metric for clients seeking patent protection.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=650 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.0%
Allowance Rate
n=650
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=650
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=449
+0.15σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=449
1061 days
Time to Allowance
n=449
+2.2pp
Interview Lift
n=650
39.1%
RCE Rate
n=650
3.6%
Appeal Rate
n=650

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

79.2%
§101 Overcome
n=101
87.4%
§102 Overcome
n=199
85.2%
§103 Overcome
n=325
87.1%
§112 Overcome
n=163

Specialization & Scale

H04W, H04L, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
32%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=650
7
Practitioners
n=650
92.9
Apps / Practitioner
n=650

Portfolio Summary

14
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (36%)
7
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (7%)
§101 + other2 (14%)
§103 only7 (50%)
§112 only1 (7%)
Double-patenting only1 (7%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
7% of docket
4
Information Tech
29% of docket
5
Communications
36% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
4
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

140 h
Manual time on pending OAs
28 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
49 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DOUGLAS, MICHELE CAMILLE 2 75.0% +42.9%
MEHEDI, MORSHED 1 85.8% -0.5%
GRACIA, GARY S 1 71.5% +48.0%
SHAH, TANMAY K 1 89.1% +9.2%
SU, SARAH 1 80.2% +18.0%
ELNOUBI, SAID M 1 74.2% +20.2%
CERVETTI, DAVID GARCIA 1 82.8% +15.3%
SHEDRICK, CHARLES TERRELL 1 77.7% +9.5%
KHANAL, SANDARVA 1 67.8% +14.3%
BRAHMACHARI, MANDRITA 1 76.8% +28.9%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19097706 Providing Access to Data in a Secure Communication MEHEDI, MORSHED —
18972462 ASSESSING AND IDENTIFYING RESPONSES TO SECURITY RISKS SU, SARAH —
18773965 CONNECTOR MANAGEMENT & IMPLEMENTATION FOR FLEXIBLE PLATFORM CERVETTI, DAVID GARCIA —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18401159 Artificial Intelligence Queries with Multiple Constraints VO, HUYEN X 2d overdue
18971266 AGGREGATING DATA FROM INTERNET OF THING DEVICES TO HELP DETECT EMERGENCY EVENT SHAH, TANMAY K —
18662001 TELEPHONY DEVICES FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINTS DOUGLAS, MICHELE CAMILLE —
18601645 CLASSIFICATION OF COMMUNICATION TO PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINT KHANAL, SANDARVA —
18598858 LOCATION INTELLIGENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD BRAHMACHARI, MANDRITA —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18984089 EARLY FILTERING OF CLEAN FILE USING DYNAMIC ANALYSIS GRACIA, GARY S —
18972462 ASSESSING AND IDENTIFYING RESPONSES TO SECURITY RISKS SU, SARAH —
18916151 DETERMINING EMERGENCY SEVERITY AND RESPONSE STRATEGY ELNOUBI, SAID M —
18773965 CONNECTOR MANAGEMENT & IMPLEMENTATION FOR FLEXIBLE PLATFORM CERVETTI, DAVID GARCIA —
18662001 TELEPHONY DEVICES FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINTS DOUGLAS, MICHELE CAMILLE —
18648141 TELEPHONY DEVICES FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINTS DOUGLAS, MICHELE CAMILLE —
18601645 CLASSIFICATION OF COMMUNICATION TO PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINT KHANAL, SANDARVA —
18598858 LOCATION INTELLIGENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD BRAHMACHARI, MANDRITA —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26463
24991
26321
24311
24091
24531
26561
17451

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19097706 Providing Access to Data in a Secure Communication Sonicwall Inc. MEHEDI, MORSHED DP Final Rejection — Pending Apr 01, 2025
18984089 EARLY FILTERING OF CLEAN FILE USING DYNAMIC ANALYSIS Sonicwall, Inc. GRACIA, GARY S 2499 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 17, 2024
18971266 AGGREGATING DATA FROM INTERNET OF THING DEVICES TO HELP DETECT EMERGENCY EVENT Intrado Life & Safety, Inc. SHAH, TANMAY K 2632 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18972462 ASSESSING AND IDENTIFYING RESPONSES TO SECURITY RISKS Banyan Security, Inc. SU, SARAH 2431 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18916151 DETERMINING EMERGENCY SEVERITY AND RESPONSE STRATEGY Intrado Life & Safety, Inc. ELNOUBI, SAID M §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18773965 CONNECTOR MANAGEMENT & IMPLEMENTATION FOR FLEXIBLE PLATFORM Sonicwall Inc. CERVETTI, DAVID GARCIA 2409 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2024
18662001 TELEPHONY DEVICES FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINTS Intrado Life & Safety, Inc. DOUGLAS, MICHELE CAMILLE 2646 §101 Final Rejection — Pending May 13, 2024
18648141 TELEPHONY DEVICES FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINTS Intrado Life & Safety, Inc. DOUGLAS, MICHELE CAMILLE 2646 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 26, 2024
18627076 PRECISION ROUTING FOR EMERGENCY CALL Intrado Life & Safety, Inc. SHEDRICK, CHARLES TERRELL 2646 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 04, 2024
18601645 CLASSIFICATION OF COMMUNICATION TO PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINT Intrado Life & Safety, Inc. KHANAL, SANDARVA 2453 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 11, 2024
18598858 LOCATION INTELLIGENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD South Tejas Solutions, LLC BRAHMACHARI, MANDRITA §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2024
18401159 Artificial Intelligence Queries with Multiple Constraints Cx360, Inc. VO, HUYEN X 2656 §101§103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Dec 29, 2023
18401165 PROMPT GENERATOR FOR TESTING Cx360, Inc. CADY, MATTHEW ALAN §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 29, 2023
18238865 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BONDING REINFORCED HDPE PIPES Robert David Jones Iii KOCH, GEORGE R 1745 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 28, 2023

Managing Patent Capital Group's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month