Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Patterson and Sheridan, LLP

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

13 pending office actions • 4 clients • 12 examiners • 12 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Patterson+Sheridan, LLP has 14 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and 264 career applications. The current docket is limited relative to the reported application base, with prosecution focused on biotechnology and pharmaceutical subject matter.

The resolved allowance rate is 83.95%, and the average is 2.85 office actions per allowance. The allowance rate indicates that most resolved applications reached allowance, while the action average shows that successful matters generally involved several examination exchanges. This provides practitioners with a combined view of resolution frequency and response burden.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=264 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.0%
Allowance Rate
n=264
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=264
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=68
-0.34σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=68
1043 days
Time to Allowance
n=68
+5.3pp
Interview Lift
n=264
27.2%
RCE Rate
n=264
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=264

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=3 (min 20)
53.5%
§102 Overcome
n=43
62.5%
§103 Overcome
n=80
64.6%
§112 Overcome
n=48

Specialization & Scale

G01N, E21B, C09K
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=264
10
Practitioners
n=264
26.4
Apps / Practitioner
n=264

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
12
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (46%)
7
Medium (54%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (8%)
§103 only6 (46%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
54% of docket
2
Information Tech
15% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
15% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
15% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RUNYAN, SILVANA C 2 82.5% +17.0%
KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE 1 44.1% +38.1%
TOOMER, CEPHIA D 1 74.4% +2.6%
SHARMA, SANTOSH 1 72.8% +29.8%
NIA, FATEMEH ESFANDIARI 1 71.5% +19.9%
NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D 1 64.8% +28.1%
SABILA, MERCY HELLEN 1 57.5% +45.3%
WHITE, JAY MICHAEL 1 47.1% +100.0%
HANN, JAY B 1 61.3% +31.5%
CAZE-CORTES, TESSALIE ADELINA 1 — —

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18827255 METHODS AND FORMULATIONS FOR ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY RUNYAN, SILVANA C —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19276651 FOAMING AGENTS, GAS MOBILITY CONTROL AGENTS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY RUNYAN, SILVANA C —
19103251 APPARATUS AND PROCESSES FOR SOLVENT EXTRACTION OF COAL TOOMER, CEPHIA D —
18981231 TOMATO PROPAGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BREEDING SHARMA, SANTOSH —
18868647 DEVICES FOR CHARACTERIZING THE RESPONSE OF PRESSURE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS NIA, FATEMEH ESFANDIARI —
18239220 THREE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR CHARACTERIZING QUASI-STATIC PROCESSES WHITE, JAY MICHAEL —
18239533 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR PORE NETWORK DUPLICATION AND BLENDING HANN, JAY B —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19440551 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PLANT POLLINATION KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE —
19276651 FOAMING AGENTS, GAS MOBILITY CONTROL AGENTS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY RUNYAN, SILVANA C —
18981231 TOMATO PROPAGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BREEDING SHARMA, SANTOSH —
18868647 DEVICES FOR CHARACTERIZING THE RESPONSE OF PRESSURE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS NIA, FATEMEH ESFANDIARI —
18907864 CARBON FOAMS, DOPED CARBON COMPOSITES, PROCESSES FOR FABRICATING CARBON FOAMS AND DOPED CARBON COMPOSITES, AND USES THEREOF NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D —
18827255 METHODS AND FORMULATIONS FOR ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY RUNYAN, SILVANA C —
18737141 FIBRIN PARTICLES AND METHODS OF FORMING FIBRIN PARTICLES SABILA, MERCY HELLEN —
18239220 THREE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR CHARACTERIZING QUASI-STATIC PROCESSES WHITE, JAY MICHAEL —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28552
36421
36741
17711
16631
17611
16161
16541
21881
21861

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19440551 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PLANT POLLINATION Mjnn LLC KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE 3642 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 05, 2026
19276651 FOAMING AGENTS, GAS MOBILITY CONTROL AGENTS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING RUNYAN, SILVANA C 3674 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 22, 2025
19103251 APPARATUS AND PROCESSES FOR SOLVENT EXTRACTION OF COAL UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING TOOMER, CEPHIA D 1771 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2025
18981231 TOMATO PROPAGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BREEDING Mjnn LLC SHARMA, SANTOSH 1663 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2024
18868647 DEVICES FOR CHARACTERIZING THE RESPONSE OF PRESSURE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING NIA, FATEMEH ESFANDIARI 2855 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 22, 2024
18907864 CARBON FOAMS, DOPED CARBON COMPOSITES, PROCESSES FOR FABRICATING CARBON FOAMS AND DOPED CARBON COMPOSITES, AND USES THEREOF UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D 1761 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 07, 2024
18827255 METHODS AND FORMULATIONS FOR ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY Piri Technologies, LLC RUNYAN, SILVANA C 1616 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18737141 FIBRIN PARTICLES AND METHODS OF FORMING FIBRIN PARTICLES UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING SABILA, MERCY HELLEN 1654 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2024
18239220 THREE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR CHARACTERIZING QUASI-STATIC PROCESSES UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING WHITE, JAY MICHAEL 2188 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2023
18239533 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR PORE NETWORK DUPLICATION AND BLENDING UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING HANN, JAY B 2186 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2023
18209588 INFINITE-ACTING AND INFINITE-SUPPLY MICROMODEL SYSTEMS Alchemy Sciences, Inc. CAZE-CORTES, TESSALIE ADELINA 2855 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 14, 2023
17482143 HYDROGEL-ENCAPSULATED BETA CELLS, BETA-CELL ENCAPSULATION PROCESS, AND USES THEREOF UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING VANHORN, ABIGAIL LOUISE 1636 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 22, 2021
17463362 HYDROGEL-ENCAPSULATED CELLS AND HYDROGEL-DISPERSED CELLS UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING WRIGHT, SARAH C 1619 §103Other Non-Final OA 23d Pending Aug 31, 2021

Managing Patterson and Sheridan, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Patterson and Sheridan, LLP's patent allowance rate?

84.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Patterson and Sheridan, LLP were allowed, across 264 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Patterson and Sheridan, LLP average before allowance?

2.85 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Patterson and Sheridan, LLP have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 12 examiners in 12 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month