Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Perkins Coie LLP - Sea General

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 8 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

PERKINS COIE LLP - SEA General handles Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems matters and has 8 pending office actions. The firm reports 7513 career applications, giving the current docket a broad historical context.

The resolved allowance rate is 79.28%, and the average office actions per allowance is 3.19. These measures provide separate views of prosecution outcome and examination activity, with the rate describing resolved allowances and the action average describing the work associated with allowed matters. Practitioners can use them to assess current response obligations against the firm’s recorded experience in this technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=7513 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

79.3%
Allowance Rate
n=7513
+0.45σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=7513
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=4278
-0.09σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=4278
1129 days
Time to Allowance
n=4278
+9.1pp
Interview Lift
n=7513
23.8%
RCE Rate
n=7513
2.7%
Appeal Rate
n=7513

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.3%
§101 Overcome
n=856
77.2%
§102 Overcome
n=1530
78.4%
§103 Overcome
n=2478
81.0%
§112 Overcome
n=1398

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=7513
0
Practitioners
n=7513
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=7513 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only2 (25%)
§102 only2 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DANG, PHILIP 1 77.6% +29.4%
ADAMS, GREGORY W 1 75.2% +23.8%
LE, MICHAEL 1 66.0% +21.7%
PADDA, ARI SINGH KANE 1 23.1% +14.5%
BALAJ, ANTHONY MICHAEL 1 31.2% +29.2%
YOON, CHANEL J 1 55.5% +39.3%
CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D 1 65.2% +11.1%
GRANT, ROBERT J 1 76.3% +17.5%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18240833 SMART AUDIOMETER FOR AUDIOMETRIC TESTING YOON, CHANEL J 32d overdue
18857337 ROBOTIC BLOCK LAYING MACHINE IMPROVEMENTS ADAMS, GREGORY W —
18627357 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BIOMONITORING AND PROVIDING PERSONALIZED HEALTHCARE PADDA, ARI SINGH KANE —
18537600 PATIENT-SPECIFIC IMPLANT DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING SYSTEM WITH A REGULATORY AND REIMBURSEMENT MANAGER BALAJ, ANTHONY MICHAEL —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18225549 Workflow As A Service CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D 127d overdue
18240833 SMART AUDIOMETER FOR AUDIOMETRIC TESTING YOON, CHANEL J 32d overdue
19035856 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUGMENTING DEPTH DATA FROM A DEPTH SENSOR, SUCH AS WITH DATA FROM A MULTIVIEW CAMERA SYSTEM DANG, PHILIP —
18857337 ROBOTIC BLOCK LAYING MACHINE IMPROVEMENTS ADAMS, GREGORY W —
18886784 MODIFYING DATA VISUALIZATIONS TO PERMIT IMPROVED DISPLAY OF CLUSTERED DATA POINTS LE, MICHAEL —
18627357 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BIOMONITORING AND PROVIDING PERSONALIZED HEALTHCARE PADDA, ARI SINGH KANE —
18537600 PATIENT-SPECIFIC IMPLANT DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING SYSTEM WITH A REGULATORY AND REIMBURSEMENT MANAGER BALAJ, ANTHONY MICHAEL —
18355381 ULTRA-LOW FREQUENCY WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES GRANT, ROBERT J —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37912
24881
36351
26141
36821
39921
28591

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19035856 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUGMENTING DEPTH DATA FROM A DEPTH SENSOR, SUCH AS WITH DATA FROM A MULTIVIEW CAMERA SYSTEM Proprio, Inc. DANG, PHILIP 2488 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 24, 2025
18857337 ROBOTIC BLOCK LAYING MACHINE IMPROVEMENTS Fastbrick Ip Pty Ltd. ADAMS, GREGORY W 3635 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2024
18886784 MODIFYING DATA VISUALIZATIONS TO PERMIT IMPROVED DISPLAY OF CLUSTERED DATA POINTS Capitol AI, Inc. LE, MICHAEL 2614 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 16, 2024
18627357 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BIOMONITORING AND PROVIDING PERSONALIZED HEALTHCARE One Health Biosensing Inc. PADDA, ARI SINGH KANE 3791 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 04, 2024
18537600 PATIENT-SPECIFIC IMPLANT DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING SYSTEM WITH A REGULATORY AND REIMBURSEMENT MANAGER Carlsmed, Inc. BALAJ, ANTHONY MICHAEL 3682 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 12, 2023
18240833 SMART AUDIOMETER FOR AUDIOMETRIC TESTING Soundtrace Inc. YOON, CHANEL J 3791 §102§103 Non-Final OA 32d overdue Pending Aug 31, 2023
18225549 Workflow As A Service Nintex UK Ltd. CAMPBELL, JOSHUA D 3992 §102Other Non-Final OA 127d overdue Pending Jul 24, 2023
18355381 ULTRA-LOW FREQUENCY WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES Flyx Technologies Inc. GRANT, ROBERT J 2859 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 19, 2023

Managing Perkins Coie LLP - Sea General's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Perkins Coie LLP - Sea General's patent allowance rate?

79.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Perkins Coie LLP - Sea General were allowed, across 7,513 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Perkins Coie LLP - Sea General average before allowance?

3.19 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Perkins Coie LLP - Sea General have?

8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 8 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month