Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Perkins Coie LLP - Tusimple

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 2 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 35 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

PERKINS COIE LLP - TuSimple focuses on Computing & Software and has 6 pending office actions. Its career application record includes 772 applications, providing historical context for the current docket.

The resolved allowance rate is 76.43%, and the average office actions per allowance is 2.9. The rate measures outcomes among resolved applications, while the action average reflects examination activity associated with allowances. Practitioners can use these indicators to consider current response demands alongside the firm’s recorded prosecution approach for the client’s computing and software matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=772 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

76.4%
Allowance Rate
n=772
+0.16σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=772
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=496
-0.20σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=496
906 days
Time to Allowance
n=496
+20.5pp
Interview Lift
n=772
25.9%
RCE Rate
n=772
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=772

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

62.8%
§101 Overcome
n=137
67.1%
§102 Overcome
n=255
68.5%
§103 Overcome
n=444
73.7%
§112 Overcome
n=198

Specialization & Scale

B60W, G05D, G06V
Top CPC Subclasses
34%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=772
0
Practitioners
n=772
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=772 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
43% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
43% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZAMAN, SADARUZ 1 46.0% +33.5%
AYAD, MARIA S 1 35.2% +15.8%
ALLISON, ANDRAE S 1 84.1% -15.5%
WALLACE, DONALD JOSEPH 1 77.3% +15.3%
MILLER, PRESTON JAY 1 54.2% +24.4%
WECHSELBERGER, ALFRED H. 1 59.0% +31.5%
TSENG, KYLE HWA-KAI 1 46.2% +53.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18596354 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VEHICLE POSITION AND VELOCITY ESTIMATION BASED ON CAMERA AND LIDAR DATA ALLISON, ANDRAE S —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18517517 MICROPHONE ARRAYS TO OPTIMIZE THE ACOUSTIC PERCEPTION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WALLACE, DONALD JOSEPH 112d overdue
17818338 SIMULATION METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE WECHSELBERGER, ALFRED H. 71d
18773299 FAULT INJECTION TOOL FOR SAFETY DRIVER TRAINING ZAMAN, SADARUZ —
18048011 CURB DETECTION BY ANALYSIS OF REFLECTION IMAGES MILLER, PRESTON JAY —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18517517 MICROPHONE ARRAYS TO OPTIMIZE THE ACOUSTIC PERCEPTION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WALLACE, DONALD JOSEPH 112d overdue
17648291 METHOD, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM FOR SIMULATION TEST TSENG, KYLE HWA-KAI 15d
17818338 SIMULATION METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE WECHSELBERGER, ALFRED H. 71d
18773299 FAULT INJECTION TOOL FOR SAFETY DRIVER TRAINING ZAMAN, SADARUZ —
18662833 MULTI-NODE COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURE FOR CONTROL OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AYAD, MARIA S —
18048011 CURB DETECTION BY ANALYSIS OF REFLECTION IMAGES MILLER, PRESTON JAY —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37151
21721
26731
36651
36611
21871
21891

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18773299 FAULT INJECTION TOOL FOR SAFETY DRIVER TRAINING TuSimple, Inc. ZAMAN, SADARUZ 3715 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18662833 MULTI-NODE COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURE FOR CONTROL OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TuSimple, Inc. AYAD, MARIA S 2172 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 13, 2024
18596354 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VEHICLE POSITION AND VELOCITY ESTIMATION BASED ON CAMERA AND LIDAR DATA TuSimple, Inc. ALLISON, ANDRAE S 2673 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 05, 2024
18517517 MICROPHONE ARRAYS TO OPTIMIZE THE ACOUSTIC PERCEPTION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TuSimple, Inc. WALLACE, DONALD JOSEPH 3665 §103§112 Non-Final OA 112d overdue Pending Nov 22, 2023
18048011 CURB DETECTION BY ANALYSIS OF REFLECTION IMAGES TuSimple, Inc. MILLER, PRESTON JAY 3661 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 19, 2022
17818338 SIMULATION METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE BEIJING TUSEN ZHITU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. WECHSELBERGER, ALFRED H. 2187 §101 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Aug 08, 2022
17648291 METHOD, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM FOR SIMULATION TEST TuSimple, Inc. TSENG, KYLE HWA-KAI 2189 §103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Jan 18, 2022

Managing Perkins Coie LLP - Tusimple's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Perkins Coie LLP - Tusimple's patent allowance rate?

76.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Perkins Coie LLP - Tusimple were allowed, across 772 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Perkins Coie LLP - Tusimple average before allowance?

2.90 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Perkins Coie LLP - Tusimple have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 7 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month