Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Piroozi-Ip, LLC And Prf

6 pending office actions • 1 client • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 21 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=392 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.0%
Allowance Rate
n=392
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=392
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=200
-0.48σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=200
814 days
Time to Allowance
n=200
-6.4pp
Interview Lift
n=392
24.2%
RCE Rate
n=392
3.0%
Appeal Rate
n=392

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.8%
§101 Overcome
n=22
79.4%
§102 Overcome
n=63
79.7%
§103 Overcome
n=128
82.9%
§112 Overcome
n=105

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G01N, G06T
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=392
0
Practitioners
n=392
Apps / Practitioner
n=392 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (33%)
§103 only2 (33%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CROCKETT, JOSHUA BRIGHAM 1 81.8% +19.2%
TRAN, THIEN JASON 1 75.0% +22.6%
HU, ANN M 1 67.9% +21.3%
CHOI, DAVID E 1 75.8% +11.8%
MAI, ANH D 1 37.9% +10.0%
LEE, JOHN 1 25.7% +25.8%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17922587 PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTOR FOR SOLID PHASE SYNTHESIS LEE, JOHN 32d overdue
18227969 POWER DEVICES WITH IMPROVED ON-RESISTANCE MAI, ANH D 72d
18884032 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ROAD CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK CROCKETT, JOSHUA BRIGHAM
18608768 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STIMULUS FEEDBACK INTERVENTION TRAN, THIEN JASON

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17922587 PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTOR FOR SOLID PHASE SYNTHESIS LEE, JOHN 32d overdue
18227969 POWER DEVICES WITH IMPROVED ON-RESISTANCE MAI, ANH D 72d
18884032 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ROAD CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK CROCKETT, JOSHUA BRIGHAM
18608768 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STIMULUS FEEDBACK INTERVENTION TRAN, THIEN JASON
18444401 PROSTHETIC HAND SYSTEM WITH AN INTEGRATED IMAGE RECOGNITION SUBSYSTEM HU, ANN M
18372120 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH ACQUISITION FRAMEWORKS AND METHODS CHOI, DAVID E

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Purdue University 6

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37921
37741
21481
28931
17941

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18884032 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ROAD CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK Purdue Research Foundation CROCKETT, JOSHUA BRIGHAM §101§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 12, 2024
18608768 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STIMULUS FEEDBACK INTERVENTION Purdue Research Foundation TRAN, THIEN JASON 3792 §101§102§103 Final Rejection Pending Mar 18, 2024
18444401 PROSTHETIC HAND SYSTEM WITH AN INTEGRATED IMAGE RECOGNITION SUBSYSTEM Purdue Research Foundation HU, ANN M 3774 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 16, 2024
18372120 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH ACQUISITION FRAMEWORKS AND METHODS Purdue Research Foundation CHOI, DAVID E 2148 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 24, 2023
18227969 POWER DEVICES WITH IMPROVED ON-RESISTANCE Purdue Research Foundation MAI, ANH D 2893 §102§112 Non-Final OA 72d Pending Jul 30, 2023
17922587 PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTOR FOR SOLID PHASE SYNTHESIS Purdue Research Foundation LEE, JOHN 1794 §103 Non-Final OA 32d overdue Pending Oct 31, 2022

Managing Piroozi-Ip, LLC And Prf's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month