Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
12 pending office actions • 10 clients • 12 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
PLUMSEA LAW GROUP, LLC has 12 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 2974 career applications. The current docket is small in relation to a large recorded application history, indicating extensive experience in the firm’s stated technology area.
The resolved allowance rate is 96.32%, and the average is 1.79 office actions per allowance. The rate indicates that most resolved matters reached allowance, while the action average shows that allowance generally followed fewer than two office-action events. This profile may appeal to clients seeking substantial transportation and mechanical prosecution experience with a strong recorded allowance outcome and comparatively limited examination activity per allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (8%) |
| §101 + other | 2 (17%) |
| §103 only | 3 (25%) |
| §102 only | 1 (8%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 4 (33%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (8%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE | 1 | 95.7% | -2.7% |
| KIRSCH, ANDREW THOMAS | 1 | 50.6% | +34.6% |
| MORALES, JON ERIC C | 1 | 85.4% | +10.0% |
| EISEMAN, LYNSEY C | 1 | 49.1% | +39.5% |
| DUNHAM, JASON B | 1 | 26.8% | +27.3% |
| JORGENSEN, ABBY A | 1 | 73.7% | +14.4% |
| BOTELLO, FABIAN | 1 | 87.5% | +20.0% |
| DUNNE, KENNETH MICHAEL | 1 | 77.2% | +10.5% |
| DANIELS, JASON S | 1 | 85.8% | +15.0% |
| MCCULLOUGH, ERIC J. | 1 | 31.9% | +43.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35525284 | Handbag | BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE | — |
| 18478330 | CONTEXT-AWARE TELEPHONY SERVICES USING A LOCATION-BASED RULES BUILDER | BOTELLO, FABIAN | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18363888 | Aerodynamic Package for a Land Vehicle | DANIELS, JASON S | 5d |
| 18246094 | TRAINED AUTOENCODER, TRAINED AUTOENCODER GENERATION METHOD, NON-STATIONARY VIBRATION DETECTION METHOD, NON-STATIONARY VIBRATION DETECTION DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM | BARBEE, MANUEL L | 9d |
| 17841224 | Athlete Performance Tracking and Prediction System | HSU, RYAN | 12d |
| 18885730 | AI-Driven Care Planner with Enhanced Personalization and Incentive Management | DUNHAM, JASON B | 15d |
| 19076041 | CONTAINER LID ASSEMBLY WITH LOCKING HANDLE AND ADDITIVE CARTRIDGE CHAMBER | KIRSCH, ANDREW THOMAS | — |
| 18867486 | Methods and Systems for Controlling Blood Pressure | EISEMAN, LYNSEY C | — |
| 18299755 | FLUORORESIN MEMBRANE MATERIAL AND PRODUCTION PROCESS THEREFOR | MCCULLOUGH, ERIC J. | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18363888 | Aerodynamic Package for a Land Vehicle | DANIELS, JASON S | 5d |
| 18885730 | AI-Driven Care Planner with Enhanced Personalization and Incentive Management | DUNHAM, JASON B | 15d |
| 18363954 | Aerodynamic Package for a Land Vehicle | DUNNE, KENNETH MICHAEL | 56d |
| 19076041 | CONTAINER LID ASSEMBLY WITH LOCKING HANDLE AND ADDITIVE CARTRIDGE CHAMBER | KIRSCH, ANDREW THOMAS | — |
| 19021558 | Methods and Apparatus to Stimulate the Heart | MORALES, JON ERIC C | — |
| 18867486 | Methods and Systems for Controlling Blood Pressure | EISEMAN, LYNSEY C | — |
| 18818995 | MODULAR CONVEYOR BELT LINK | JORGENSEN, ABBY A | — |
| 18478330 | CONTEXT-AWARE TELEPHONY SERVICES USING A LOCATION-BASED RULES BUILDER | BOTELLO, FABIAN | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| BackBeat Medical | 2 |
| ESS 2 Tech | 2 |
| Akris Prêt-à-Porter AG | 1 |
| Cirkul | 1 |
| Healthcare Interactive | 1 |
| Ammeraal Beltech Modular A/S | 1 |
| Radar Labs, Inc. | 1 |
| TAIYO KOGYO CORPORATION | 1 |
| SI SYNERGY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. | 1 |
| PIFperformance Inc. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 2 |
| 2913 | 1 |
| 3733 | 1 |
| 3686 | 1 |
| 3651 | 1 |
| 2648 | 1 |
| 3669 | 1 |
| 3612 | 1 |
| 1773 | 1 |
| 2857 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35525284 | Handbag | Akris Prêt-à-Porter AG | BRODOWSKI, SAMANTHA LYNNE | 2913 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 15, 2025 |
| 19076041 | CONTAINER LID ASSEMBLY WITH LOCKING HANDLE AND ADDITIVE CARTRIDGE CHAMBER | Cirkul, Inc. | KIRSCH, ANDREW THOMAS | 3733 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 11, 2025 |
| 19021558 | Methods and Apparatus to Stimulate the Heart | Backbeat Medical, LLC | MORALES, JON ERIC C | 3796 | Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 15, 2025 |
| 18867486 | Methods and Systems for Controlling Blood Pressure | Backbeat Medical, LLC | EISEMAN, LYNSEY C | 3796 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 20, 2024 |
| 18885730 | AI-Driven Care Planner with Enhanced Personalization and Incentive Management | Healthcare Interactive, Inc. | DUNHAM, JASON B | 3686 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Sep 15, 2024 |
| 18818995 | MODULAR CONVEYOR BELT LINK | Ammeraal Beltech Modular A/S | JORGENSEN, ABBY A | 3651 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 29, 2024 |
| 18478330 | CONTEXT-AWARE TELEPHONY SERVICES USING A LOCATION-BASED RULES BUILDER | Radar Labs, Inc. | BOTELLO, FABIAN | 2648 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 29, 2023 |
| 18363954 | Aerodynamic Package for a Land Vehicle | Ess 2 Tech, LLC | DUNNE, KENNETH MICHAEL | 3669 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | Aug 02, 2023 |
| 18363888 | Aerodynamic Package for a Land Vehicle | Ess 2 Tech, LLC | DANIELS, JASON S | 3612 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Aug 02, 2023 |
| 18299755 | FLUORORESIN MEMBRANE MATERIAL AND PRODUCTION PROCESS THEREFOR | Taiyo Kogyo Corporation | MCCULLOUGH, ERIC J. | 1773 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 13, 2023 |
| 18246094 | TRAINED AUTOENCODER, TRAINED AUTOENCODER GENERATION METHOD, NON-STATIONARY VIBRATION DETECTION METHOD, NON-STATIONARY VIBRATION DETECTION DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM | Si Synergy Technology Co., Ltd. | BARBEE, MANUEL L | 2857 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Mar 21, 2023 |
| 17841224 | Athlete Performance Tracking and Prediction System | Pifperformance Inc. | HSU, RYAN | 3715 | §101 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Jun 15, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial96.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Plumsea Law Group, LLC were allowed, across 2,974 applications in USPTO records.
1.79 office actions per allowed application on average.
12 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 10 clients, before 12 examiners in 11 art units.
