Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Prince Lobel Tye LLP

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 7 clients • 7 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Prince Lobel Tye LLP focuses on Chemistry & Materials, where it has managed 686 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 86.9 percent, indicating its historical success in securing patent grants. This performance is achieved through a process that averages 3.5 office actions per allowance, which reflects the typical level of negotiation required in chemical prosecution.

Currently, the firm has 4 pending office actions to address. The 86.9 percent allowance rate suggests a consistent outcome for clients, while the 3.5 office actions per allowance indicate that multiple rounds of communication with the patent office are common. With 686 career applications, the firm has established a clear track record in the Chemistry & Materials sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=688 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.9%
Allowance Rate
n=688
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=688
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=418
-0.08σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=418
1025 days
Time to Allowance
n=418
+7.5pp
Interview Lift
n=688
25.8%
RCE Rate
n=688
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=688

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

71.7%
§101 Overcome
n=46
83.7%
§102 Overcome
n=178
84.8%
§103 Overcome
n=276
82.9%
§112 Overcome
n=211

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G11C, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=688
3
Practitioners
n=688
229.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=688

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
2
Medium (29%)
3
Easy (43%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only1 (14%)
§112 only3 (43%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
2
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZHANG, YINGCHUAN 1 68.7% +28.6%
NUR, ABDULLAHI 1 88.2% +6.1%
NILFOROUSH, MOHAMMAD A 1 30.8% +36.1%
PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN 1 28.0% +43.1%
VANDERVEEN, JEFFREY S 1 64.2% +17.3%
GEBRE, MESSERET F 1 56.6% +20.1%
CASE, SARAH CATHERINE 1 41.1% +50.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18975133 AUTOMATED VISION CARE DIAGNOSTICS AND DIGITALLY COMPENSATED SMART EYEWEAR NUR, ABDULLAHI —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19009242 Buoyant Water-Inflatable Toy ZHANG, YINGCHUAN —
18899641 DISPLAY DEVICE GATED ON NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN CONTRACTS NILFOROUSH, MOHAMMAD A —
18774371 Wearable Thermoregulation Device PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18535144 APPLICATION-LAYER LOAD BALANCING AND HIGH AVAILABILITY VIA LACP BONDING IN A NETWORK GEBRE, MESSERET F 16d
19009242 Buoyant Water-Inflatable Toy ZHANG, YINGCHUAN —
18899641 DISPLAY DEVICE GATED ON NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN CONTRACTS NILFOROUSH, MOHAMMAD A —
18774371 Wearable Thermoregulation Device PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN —
18740671 USER DEVICE METHOD FOR WIRELESS ELECTRONIC TABLE GAME SCOREBOARD VANDERVEEN, JEFFREY S —
17964447 Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Material for Concrete Applications CASE, SARAH CATHERINE —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28771
36971
37941
24451
17311

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19009242 Buoyant Water-Inflatable Toy Slis Inc. ZHANG, YINGCHUAN §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2025
18975133 AUTOMATED VISION CARE DIAGNOSTICS AND DIGITALLY COMPENSATED SMART EYEWEAR Roka Labs, Inc. NUR, ABDULLAHI 2877 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 10, 2024
18899641 DISPLAY DEVICE GATED ON NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN CONTRACTS Facet Labs Inc. NILFOROUSH, MOHAMMAD A 3697 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2024
18774371 Wearable Thermoregulation Device Thermaband, Inc. PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN 3794 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2024
18740671 USER DEVICE METHOD FOR WIRELESS ELECTRONIC TABLE GAME SCOREBOARD Medal Sports (Taiwan) Corporation VANDERVEEN, JEFFREY S §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 12, 2024
18535144 APPLICATION-LAYER LOAD BALANCING AND HIGH AVAILABILITY VIA LACP BONDING IN A NETWORK 12952386 Canada Inc. GEBRE, MESSERET F 2445 §112 Final Rejection 16d Pending Dec 11, 2023
17964447 Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Material for Concrete Applications Chasm Advanced Materials, Inc. CASE, SARAH CATHERINE 1731 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 12, 2022

Managing Prince Lobel Tye LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month