Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Prismatic Law Group, Pllc

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

8 pending office actions • 6 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Prismatic Law Group, PLLC operates within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector, handling 177 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 76.99 percent, which serves as a benchmark for its performance in this field. Prosecution typically requires 3.59 office actions per allowance, suggesting a rigorous examination process for these life sciences patents.

The firm currently manages 7 pending office actions. For clients in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals space, the 76.99 percent allowance rate and the 177 career applications provide a clear view of the firm's historical footprint. The average of 3.59 office actions per allowance highlights the persistence required to navigate the USPTO in this technology area, ensuring that each application is thoroughly examined.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=177 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

77.4%
Allowance Rate
n=177
+1.34σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=177
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=89
-0.29σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=89
1213 days
Time to Allowance
n=89
+24.4pp
Interview Lift
n=177
23.5%
RCE Rate
n=177
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=177

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=17 (min 20)
77.5%
§102 Overcome
n=40
74.2%
§103 Overcome
n=62
75.5%
§112 Overcome
n=98

Specialization & Scale

A61K, C07K, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
58%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=177
0
Practitioners
n=177
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=177 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (38%)
4
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (25%)
§103 only2 (25%)
§112 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting + other2 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
88% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VALENROD, YEVGENY 1 72.6% +25.1%
MELCHIOR, JAMES RYLAND 1 63.0% +38.5%
DONOGHUE, BRITTNEY ERIN 1 58.8% +46.5%
MOSELEY II, NELSON B 1 68.0% +41.5%
WEDDINGTON, KEVIN E 1 75.2% +9.8%
LEVERETT, MARY CHANG 1 60.2% +20.8%
MAHLUM, JONATHAN DAVIS 1 51.4% +25.6%
MIANO, JOSEPH PAUL 1 36.0% +63.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18184657 TREATMENT OF AUTOIMMUNE SKIN DISEASE WEDDINGTON, KEVIN E 182d overdue
17995525 METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING SIGNATURES FOR PREDICTING TREATMENT RESPONSE LEVERETT, MARY CHANG 30d
18317385 DUAL TARGETING MOSELEY II, NELSON B —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17906184 PROTEOLYSIS TARGETING CHIMERA (PROTAC) FOR DEGRADATION OF AURORA A-KINASE MAHLUM, JONATHAN DAVIS 80d overdue
17995525 METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING SIGNATURES FOR PREDICTING TREATMENT RESPONSE LEVERETT, MARY CHANG 30d
18835823 DHODH INHIBITOR POLYMORPH VALENROD, YEVGENY —
18258957 ANTIBODY VARIABLE DOMAINS AND ANTIBODIES HAVING DECREASED IMMUNOGENICITY MELCHIOR, JAMES RYLAND —
18258939 ANTIBODY VARIABLE DOMAINS THAT BIND IL-4R DONOGHUE, BRITTNEY ERIN —
18317385 DUAL TARGETING MOSELEY II, NELSON B —
16621741 NOVEL METHODS FOR THE GENERATION AND USE OF HUMAN INDUCED NEURAL BORDER STEM CELLS MIANO, JOSEPH PAUL —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16441
16751
16421
16291
16871
16251
16311

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18835823 DHODH INHIBITOR POLYMORPH Aslan Pharmaceuticals Pte Ltd VALENROD, YEVGENY §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 05, 2024
18258957 ANTIBODY VARIABLE DOMAINS AND ANTIBODIES HAVING DECREASED IMMUNOGENICITY Numab Therapeutics AG MELCHIOR, JAMES RYLAND 1644 §112DPOther Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 22, 2023
18258939 ANTIBODY VARIABLE DOMAINS THAT BIND IL-4R Numab Therapeutics AG DONOGHUE, BRITTNEY ERIN 1675 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 22, 2023
18317385 DUAL TARGETING Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. MOSELEY II, NELSON B 1642 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 15, 2023
18184657 TREATMENT OF AUTOIMMUNE SKIN DISEASE Aslan Pharmaceuticals Pte Ltd WEDDINGTON, KEVIN E 1629 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 182d overdue Pending Mar 16, 2023
17995525 METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING SIGNATURES FOR PREDICTING TREATMENT RESPONSE UMC Utrecht Holding B.V. LEVERETT, MARY CHANG 1687 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Oct 05, 2022
17906184 PROTEOLYSIS TARGETING CHIMERA (PROTAC) FOR DEGRADATION OF AURORA A-KINASE Julius-Maximilians-Universitaet Wuerzburg MAHLUM, JONATHAN DAVIS 1625 §103 Final Rejection 80d overdue Pending Sep 12, 2022
16621741 NOVEL METHODS FOR THE GENERATION AND USE OF HUMAN INDUCED NEURAL BORDER STEM CELLS Hi-Stem Ggmbh MIANO, JOSEPH PAUL 1631 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2019

Managing Prismatic Law Group, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month