Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Rowand Llp-Shopify

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 1 client • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Rowand LLP-Shopify focuses on Communications with 664 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 88.81 percent. It averages 3.25 office actions per allowance, indicating the frequency of examiner communication before an allowance is secured.

There are 5 pending office actions currently. The 88.81 percent allowance rate is based on the 664 career applications. The 3.25 average office actions per allowance provides a metric for the typical number of examiner responses required to reach an allowance. This data set offers a precise look at the firm's performance in the communications sector.

The 664 career applications provide a robust data set for evaluating the firm's 88.81 percent allowance rate. The 5 pending office actions show a focused current docket. Practitioners can use the average office actions per allowance to benchmark the expected effort and duration for applications in this field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=664 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.8%
Allowance Rate
n=664
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=664
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=373
-0.24σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=373
934 days
Time to Allowance
n=373
-4.6pp
Interview Lift
n=664
33.3%
RCE Rate
n=664
1.9%
Appeal Rate
n=664

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

65.4%
§101 Overcome
n=78
74.4%
§102 Overcome
n=191
73.6%
§103 Overcome
n=334
73.0%
§112 Overcome
n=167

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, H10W
Top CPC Subclasses
22%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=664
8
Practitioners
n=664
83.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=664

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (20%)
§101 + other2 (40%)
§103 only2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
60% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COBB, MICHAEL J 1 76.7% +36.2%
LHYMN, SARAH 1 65.9% +15.0%
LEE, ADAM 1 84.1% +61.0%
LAU, TUNG S 1 83.0% +14.5%
TRUONG, DANIEL NHU 1 — —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19008785 AUGMENTED REALITY ENABLED DYNAMIC PRODUCT PRESENTATION COBB, MICHAEL J —
18650161 SCHEMA-BASED RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR REQUEST PROCESSING LEE, ADAM —
18633654 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE OF ONLINE SERVICES LAU, TUNG S —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19008785 AUGMENTED REALITY ENABLED DYNAMIC PRODUCT PRESENTATION COBB, MICHAEL J —
18909025 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR GENERATING COMPOSITE IMAGES LHYMN, SARAH —
18650161 SCHEMA-BASED RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR REQUEST PROCESSING LEE, ADAM —
18633654 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE OF ONLINE SERVICES LAU, TUNG S —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Shopify 5

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26131
28571
41001

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19008785 AUGMENTED REALITY ENABLED DYNAMIC PRODUCT PRESENTATION Shopify Inc. COBB, MICHAEL J §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2025
18909025 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR GENERATING COMPOSITE IMAGES Shopify Inc. LHYMN, SARAH 2613 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18650161 SCHEMA-BASED RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR REQUEST PROCESSING Shopify Inc. LEE, ADAM §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2024
18633654 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE OF ONLINE SERVICES Shopify Inc. LAU, TUNG S 2857 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 12, 2024
18443600 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR MANAGING DISTRIBUTED EXECUTION OF WORKFLOWS Shopify Inc. TRUONG, DANIEL NHU 4100 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2024

Managing Rowand Llp-Shopify's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month