Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Scheef & Stone, L.L.P.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

24 pending office actions • 18 clients • 24 examiners • 21 art units • 0 of 24 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SCHEEF & STONE, L.L.P. reports 854 career applications, 24 pending office actions, and a Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering focus. The record shows an established application history with an active current workload in a field where device architecture and mechanical interactions may drive prosecution strategy.

The resolved allowance rate is 87.17%, and the average is 3.28 office actions per allowance. The allowance measure supplies historical outcome context, while the action average indicates the examination activity associated with an allowance. Practitioners can use these figures for portfolio planning, without treating them as explanations of individual results.

File review should examine structural claim limitations, functional relationships, prior-art distinctions, and support for amendments. That analysis is needed to determine whether the historical indicators translate to a particular device or mechanical application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=854 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.2%
Allowance Rate
n=854
+0.62σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=854
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=489
-0.09σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=489
1032 days
Time to Allowance
n=489
+6.1pp
Interview Lift
n=854
26.2%
RCE Rate
n=854
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=854

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.5%
§101 Overcome
n=63
78.7%
§102 Overcome
n=174
78.6%
§103 Overcome
n=304
82.2%
§112 Overcome
n=231

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, E21B, A61M
Top CPC Subclasses
10%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=854
5
Practitioners
n=854
170.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=854

Portfolio Summary

24
Total Pending OAs
15
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

13
Hard (54%)
6
Medium (25%)
4
Easy (17%)
1
Unknown (4%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (4%)
§103 only6 (25%)
§112 only3 (12%)
Double-patenting only1 (4%)
Multi-statute (no §101)12 (50%)
No statute on record1 (4%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
17% of docket
2
Information Tech
8% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
4% of docket
15
Mechanical / Eng
62% of docket
2
Business / Other
8% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

240 h
Manual time on pending OAs
48 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
84 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M 1 69.2% +19.6%
EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 1 16.4% +36.5%
PARSLEY, DAVID J 1 54.1% +28.7%
MATTISON, LORI K 1 15.2% +27.8%
RODRIGUEZ, RAYNA B 1 33.6% +19.2%
BERHANU, ETSUB D 1 65.1% +24.7%
PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH 1 59.3% +32.1%
LAZO, THOMAS E 1 86.8% +8.9%
NGUYEN, TUAN N 1 68.1% +26.4%
PATEL, NIDHI NIRAJ 1 52.9% +47.5%

Hard Cases (13)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19288703 FLOW CONTROL VALVE MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M —
19271209 System and Method to Determine Parameters for a Medical Injection EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH —
19192917 Compositions and Methods for Treating Aging Hair MATTISON, LORI K —
19180752 Topical Benzimidazole Formulations and Methods for Use in Treating Inflammatory Dermatoses RODRIGUEZ, RAYNA B —
19092719 Blood Collection Tube Holder with Slidable Needle Safety Device BERHANU, ETSUB D —
19020507 TWO-FINGER GLOVE WITH EMBEDDED PALM SPACER FOR THROWING AN OBJECT PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH —
19012347 Bucket Handle Grip LAZO, THOMAS E —
19009636 Universal Sink Grate NGUYEN, TUAN N —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19288703 FLOW CONTROL VALVE MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M —
19271209 System and Method to Determine Parameters for a Medical Injection EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH —
19217222 Spring Actuated Weedless Fishing Lure PARSLEY, DAVID J —
19192917 Compositions and Methods for Treating Aging Hair MATTISON, LORI K —
19180752 Topical Benzimidazole Formulations and Methods for Use in Treating Inflammatory Dermatoses RODRIGUEZ, RAYNA B —
19092719 Blood Collection Tube Holder with Slidable Needle Safety Device BERHANU, ETSUB D —
19020507 TWO-FINGER GLOVE WITH EMBEDDED PALM SPACER FOR THROWING AN OBJECT PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH —
19009636 Universal Sink Grate NGUYEN, TUAN N —

Client Portfolio (18 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37912
37832
36712
37531
36871
36431
16191
16281
37321
36511

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19288703 FLOW CONTROL VALVE Svm Schultz Verwaltungs-Gmbh & Co. Kg MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M 3753 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 01, 2025
19271209 System and Method to Determine Parameters for a Medical Injection Thomas J. Shaw EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH 3687 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2025
19217222 Spring Actuated Weedless Fishing Lure Flyvanse, LLC PARSLEY, DAVID J 3643 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending May 23, 2025
19192917 Compositions and Methods for Treating Aging Hair Chl Industries, LLC MATTISON, LORI K 1619 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2025
19180752 Topical Benzimidazole Formulations and Methods for Use in Treating Inflammatory Dermatoses Jjr&D, LLC RODRIGUEZ, RAYNA B 1628 §102§103Other Final Rejection — Pending Apr 16, 2025
19092719 Blood Collection Tube Holder with Slidable Needle Safety Device Retractable Technologies, Inc. BERHANU, ETSUB D 3791 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2025
19020507 TWO-FINGER GLOVE WITH EMBEDDED PALM SPACER FOR THROWING AN OBJECT Kitted Global Enterprise, LLC PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH 3732 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 14, 2025
19012347 Bucket Handle Grip Danco, Inc. LAZO, THOMAS E 3651 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 07, 2025
19009636 Universal Sink Grate Danco, Inc. NGUYEN, TUAN N 3754 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2025
18951932 Combined Medical Device with Sliding Frontal Attachment and Retractable Needle Retractable Technologies, Inc. PATEL, NIDHI NIRAJ 3791 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 19, 2024
18926623 Electromagnet and Locking Arrangement With Electromagnet and Spring-pretensioned Latching Means Svm Schultz Verwaltungs-Gmbh & Co. Kg TAYLOR II, JAMES JOSEPH 3655 §112 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Oct 25, 2024
18888035 System and Method for Identifying a Fuel Loss Event S1 Technologies, Inc. ADE, OGER GARCIA 3627 Other Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Sep 17, 2024
18766943 System and Method for Real-Time, Dynamic Creation, Delivery, and Use of Customizable Web Applications Appward LLC DAO, THUY CHAN 2192 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 09, 2024
18738847 Syringe with Flat Indicia Display Surface Thomas J. Shaw BOUCHELLE, LAURA A 3783 §103 Final Rejection 71d overdue Pending Jun 10, 2024
18670877 COOKING CHAMBER MOISTURE CONTROL Method Barbecue, Llc. ISKRA, JOSEPH W 3761 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 22, 2024
18641160 Dynamic Pedestrian Access Terminal Rsg International Corp. HARTMANN, GARY S 3671 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18427266 Universal Dosage Verification System and Method for Medical Syringe Thomas J. Shaw FLICK, JASON E 3783 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 30, 2024
18577999 IMPROVED PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A POLAR PLATE Hochschule Rheinmain University Of Applied Sciences Wiesbaden Rüsselsheim MERKLING, SALLY ANNE 1738 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 09, 2024
18506463 METAL OXIDE ZINC RICINOLEATE NANOCOMPOSITE PARTICLES AND SURFACTANT COMPOSITIONS Nevitt Frangrances, Inc. JONES, KOLTON ED 4100 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 10, 2023
18471247 MACHINE-LEARNING BASED DETERMINATION OF VITAL SIGNS AND A PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE OF AN EXISTING OR POTENTIAL POLICY HOLDER FOR INSURANCE UNDERWRITING Brightermd LLC ZUBERI, MOHAMMED H 2178 §103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Sep 20, 2023
18330612 ELECTROMAGNET WITH CLOSURE ELEMENT Svm Schultz Verwaltungs-Gmbh & Co. Kg HOMZA, LISA NHUNG 2837 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Jun 07, 2023
18121836 Composition and Method for Reducing Odors in Wet Air Scrubbers Nch Corporation SPAMER, DONALD R 1799 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 15, 2023
17900723 Multi-Part Valve Assembly Valveworks, LLC ENGLISH, PETER C 3993 §112Other Non-Final OA 34d Pending Aug 31, 2022
17794462 BARRIER ELEMENT TO BLOCK TRAFFIC AND/OR AS A SECURITY PRECAUTION INCLUDING A BALLAST COMPARTMENT Roadblock Solutions, Inc. CHU, KATHERINE J 3671 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 21, 2022

Managing Scheef & Stone, L.L.P.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Scheef & Stone, L.L.P.'s patent allowance rate?

87.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. were allowed, across 854 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. average before allowance?

3.28 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Scheef & Stone, L.L.P. have?

24 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 18 clients, before 24 examiners in 21 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month