Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Schmeiser Olsen & Watts

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

14 pending office actions • 12 clients • 14 examiners • 14 art units • 0 of 14 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS reports 8011 career applications, 15 pending office actions, and a Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems focus. The application total indicates a broad historical record, while the pending workload identifies continuing active prosecution. These measures should be read as separate views of practice activity.

The resolved allowance rate is 80.86%, and the average is 2.93 office actions per allowance. The outcome rate and action average provide distinct planning information, covering historical resolution and examination effort. They can help practitioners frame portfolio expectations, but neither explains the claim or technology features associated with any individual result.

Review should connect the metrics to the prosecution record by examining mechanical structure, operational steps, system interactions, and applicable prior-art or eligibility positions. That file-specific work is necessary before relying on the aggregate indicators for strategy or resource planning.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=8011 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

80.9%
Allowance Rate
n=8011
+0.44σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=8011
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=5223
-0.24σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=5223
983 days
Time to Allowance
n=5223
+10.3pp
Interview Lift
n=8011
18.0%
RCE Rate
n=8011
2.1%
Appeal Rate
n=8011

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.6%
§101 Overcome
n=648
78.2%
§102 Overcome
n=2308
79.3%
§103 Overcome
n=3590
80.8%
§112 Overcome
n=2687

Specialization & Scale

G06F, F03D, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=8011
13
Practitioners
n=8011
616.2
Apps / Practitioner
n=8011

Portfolio Summary

14
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 12 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

9
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 12 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (9)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (29%)
3
Easy (21%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (14%)
§103 only4 (29%)
§112 only3 (21%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (36%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
21% of docket
3
Information Tech
21% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
7% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

140 h
Manual time on pending OAs
28 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
49 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KESSIE, DANIEL 1 62.1% +24.3%
NARRAMORE, BLAKE I 1 78.3% +22.9%
BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN 1 81.4% +19.9%
KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE 1 44.1% +38.1%
D'AGOSTINO, PAUL ANTHONY 1 73.2% +13.9%
STUART, COLIN W 1 57.9% +54.8%
KEENA, ELLA LORRAINE 1 13.0% +14.5%
WERNER, MARSHALL L 1 65.8% +41.3%
VERLEY, NICOLE T 1 83.8% +3.5%
DESTEFANO, AUDRA JEAN 1 57.5% +57.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18097582 PRELOAD COLLAR FOR A VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEM VERLEY, NICOLE T 132d overdue

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17496336 CERAMIC VAPE ASSEMBLY KESSIE, JENNIFER A 395d overdue
18435144 MAGNETIC TOY D'AGOSTINO, PAUL ANTHONY 237d overdue
18832727 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WRITING AND RETRIEVAL OF DATA IN BLOCKCHAIN BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN 111d overdue
18276126 BLADE SET FOR A HAIR CUTTING MACHINE KEENA, ELLA LORRAINE 44d overdue
18834056 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXCHANGING PRIVATE DATA AMONG NODES IN BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK NARRAMORE, BLAKE I 29d overdue
18023623 GENERATING A KNOWLEDGE BASE FROM MATHEMATICAL FORMULAE IN TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS WERNER, MARSHALL L 84d
18739105 GROWING SYSTEM KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE —
18472880 FLOW MANAGEMENT DEVICE CUSTOMIZABLE BY PATIENT TYPE STUART, COLIN W —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18435144 MAGNETIC TOY D'AGOSTINO, PAUL ANTHONY 237d overdue
17907696 ULTRA-SMALL NANO METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF DESTEFANO, AUDRA JEAN 184d overdue
18908913 WIND TURBINE WITH A POWER BEAMING APPARATUS, CENTRAL POWER INSTALLATION FOR A WIND FARM, WIND FARM, METHOD FOR OPERATING A WIND FARM AND METHOD FOR INSTALLING A WIND TURBINE KESSIE, DANIEL 175d overdue
18832727 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WRITING AND RETRIEVAL OF DATA IN BLOCKCHAIN BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN 111d overdue
18276126 BLADE SET FOR A HAIR CUTTING MACHINE KEENA, ELLA LORRAINE 44d overdue
18834056 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXCHANGING PRIVATE DATA AMONG NODES IN BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK NARRAMORE, BLAKE I 29d overdue
18023623 GENERATING A KNOWLEDGE BASE FROM MATHEMATICAL FORMULAE IN TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS WERNER, MARSHALL L 84d
18739105 GROWING SYSTEM KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE —

Client Portfolio (12 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28361
24381
21681
36421
37151
37851
37241
21251
36141
17661

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18908913 WIND TURBINE WITH A POWER BEAMING APPARATUS, CENTRAL POWER INSTALLATION FOR A WIND FARM, WIND FARM, METHOD FOR OPERATING A WIND FARM AND METHOD FOR INSTALLING A WIND TURBINE Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S KESSIE, DANIEL 2836 §103 Non-Final OA 175d overdue Pending Oct 08, 2024
18834056 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXCHANGING PRIVATE DATA AMONG NODES IN BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK Siemens Aktiengesellschaft NARRAMORE, BLAKE I 2438 §103§112 Non-Final OA 29d overdue Pending Jul 29, 2024
18832727 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WRITING AND RETRIEVAL OF DATA IN BLOCKCHAIN Siemens Aktiengesellschaft BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN 2168 §101§103 Non-Final OA 111d overdue Pending Jul 24, 2024
18739105 GROWING SYSTEM Green Planet Group, Inc. KLOECKER, KATHERINE ANNE 3642 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18435144 MAGNETIC TOY Smart Subscriptions, LLC D'AGOSTINO, PAUL ANTHONY 3715 §102§103 Non-Final OA 237d overdue Pending Feb 07, 2024
18472880 FLOW MANAGEMENT DEVICE CUSTOMIZABLE BY PATIENT TYPE Beaconmedaes LLC STUART, COLIN W 3785 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 22, 2023
18276126 BLADE SET FOR A HAIR CUTTING MACHINE Wahl GmbH KEENA, ELLA LORRAINE 3724 §103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Aug 07, 2023
18023623 GENERATING A KNOWLEDGE BASE FROM MATHEMATICAL FORMULAE IN TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS Indian Institute Of Science WERNER, MARSHALL L 2125 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 84d Pending Feb 27, 2023
18097582 PRELOAD COLLAR FOR A VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEM Westcott Designs Inc. VERLEY, NICOLE T 3614 §103 Final Rejection 132d overdue Pending Jan 17, 2023
17907696 ULTRA-SMALL NANO METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY DESTEFANO, AUDRA JEAN 1766 §112 Non-Final OA 184d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2022
17908262 NON-ANTIBODY BINDING PEPTIDES AND THEIR ANALOGS DUAL-TARGETING TO PD-1 AND PD-L1, AND USES THEREOF Guangzhou Yidai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. JONES, DAMERON LEVEST 1618 §112 Non-Final OA 39d Pending Aug 31, 2022
17781119 METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND ROBOT CONTROLLER FOR CONFIGURING A ROBOT-OBJECT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT, AND ROBOT Siemens Aktiengesellschaft KASPER, BYRON XAVIER 3657 §103 Non-Final OA 177d overdue Pending May 31, 2022
17640866 HYDRAULIC DOOR DRIVE FOR A LIFTING DOOR, LIFTING DOOR COMPRISING THE HYDRAULIC DOOR DRIVE, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE HYDRAULIC DOOR DRIVE Efaflex Inzeniring D.O.O. Ljubljana QUANDT, MICHAEL M 3745 §112 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Mar 07, 2022
17496336 CERAMIC VAPE ASSEMBLY Jupiter Research, LLC KESSIE, JENNIFER A 1747 §102§103 Final Rejection 395d overdue Pending Oct 07, 2021

Managing Schmeiser Olsen & Watts's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Schmeiser Olsen & Watts's patent allowance rate?

80.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Schmeiser Olsen & Watts were allowed, across 8,011 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Schmeiser Olsen & Watts average before allowance?

2.93 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Schmeiser Olsen & Watts have?

14 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 12 clients, before 14 examiners in 14 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month