Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SCHROEDER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, LLC reports 270 career applications, 6 pending office actions, and a Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems focus. The record shows a defined application history and an active workload in a field where mechanical and digitally supported system features may overlap.

The resolved allowance rate is 81.63%, and the average is 4.99 office actions per allowance. These figures provide separate views of historical outcomes and examination effort. The combination can inform response planning, while not explaining whether individual matters were affected by prior art, eligibility, claim construction, or written-description issues.

Practitioners should review the prosecution histories for the technical features driving examination and the amendments used to address them. Particular attention to system boundaries, functional limitations, and preservation of intended commercial scope will make the aggregate indicators more useful in a matter-specific assessment.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=270 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.6%
Allowance Rate
n=270
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=270
5.0
OAs to Allowance
n=200
+0.75σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=200
1206 days
Time to Allowance
n=200
+16.2pp
Interview Lift
n=270
45.3%
RCE Rate
n=270
2.5%
Appeal Rate
n=270

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=4 (min 20)
78.6%
§102 Overcome
n=131
81.5%
§103 Overcome
n=184
83.2%
§112 Overcome
n=149

Specialization & Scale

B05B, E06B, B65G
Top CPC Subclasses
19%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=270
1
Practitioners
n=270
270.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=270

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
4
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
83% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HANES JR., JOHN 2 47.6% +38.8%
CAMPBELL, KEITH 1 89.7% +0.9%
SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A 1 65.5% +34.2%
SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H 1 56.3% +37.4%
EMPIE, NATHAN H 1 43.4% +43.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18404250 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME HANES JR., JOHN 19d
18994788 CONVEYING DEVICE FOR CONVEYING MATERIAL CAMPBELL, KEITH —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18404250 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME HANES JR., JOHN 19d
16247001 TREATMENT INSTALLATION AND METHOD FOR TREATING WORKPIECES EMPIE, NATHAN H 22d
18404319 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME HANES JR., JOHN 26d
18738152 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN ROLL-UP DOORS SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A —
17799718 ELECTRON BEAM SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR THE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURE OF A WORKPIECE SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36343
36511
37611
17121

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18994788 CONVEYING DEVICE FOR CONVEYING MATERIAL Onejoon GmbH CAMPBELL, KEITH 3651 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2025
18738152 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN ROLL-UP DOORS Rytec Corporation SHABLACK, JOHNNIE A 3634 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18404250 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME Rytec Corporation HANES JR., JOHN 3634 §102§103 Final Rejection 19d Pending Jan 04, 2024
18404319 DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A SOFT BOTTOMED DOOR PANEL AND SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME Rytec Corporation HANES JR., JOHN 3634 §103 Final Rejection 26d Pending Jan 04, 2024
17799718 ELECTRON BEAM SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR THE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURE OF A WORKPIECE Pro-Beam GmbH & Co. Kgaa SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H 3761 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 15, 2022
16247001 TREATMENT INSTALLATION AND METHOD FOR TREATING WORKPIECES Eisenmann SE EMPIE, NATHAN H 1712 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Jan 14, 2019

Managing Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC's patent allowance rate?

81.6% of resolved applications prosecuted by Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC were allowed, across 270 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC average before allowance?

4.99 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Schroeder Intellectual Property Law Group, LLC have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 5 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month