Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sci-Law Strategies, Pc

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Sci-Law Strategies, PC has managed 367 career applications, with a focus on Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The firm boasts a high resolved allowance rate of 91.9 percent. Prosecution at the firm averages 3.0 office actions per allowance, which is an efficient pace for the complex biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors. This combination of high success and efficiency is a significant advantage for its clients in the life sciences.

Currently, the firm has 4 pending office actions. This small number of active matters is part of its 367 career applications. The 91.9 percent allowance rate is an exceptional metric for biotechnology patents. With 3.0 office actions per allowance, the firm demonstrates a highly effective strategy for securing patent grants in a challenging technology area, providing significant value and predictability. This data reflects a firm that delivers exceptional results with a streamlined approach to patent acquisition in a technically demanding field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=367 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.9%
Allowance Rate
n=367
+0.67σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=367
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=261
-0.36σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=261
965 days
Time to Allowance
n=261
+10.2pp
Interview Lift
n=367
22.5%
RCE Rate
n=367
0.4%
Appeal Rate
n=367

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

90.5%
§101 Overcome
n=21
86.4%
§102 Overcome
n=66
88.8%
§103 Overcome
n=125
82.8%
§112 Overcome
n=116

Specialization & Scale

G01N, G06T, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
25%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=367
0
Practitioners
n=367
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=367 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (60%)
2
Easy (40%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
§112 only2 (40%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SAJOUS, WESNER 1 92.0% +7.7%
RICKS, DONNA J 1 76.7% +10.3%
DICKENS, AMELIA NICOLE 1 47.6% +21.1%
TOWA, RENE T 1 49.3% +17.5%
ALLEN, MARIANNE P 1 60.1% +18.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19030289 APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR RULE BASED VISUALIZATION OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND OTHER VOLUMETRIC IMAGES SAJOUS, WESNER —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17768138 Natural non-pathogenic microorganisms capable of associating glycolipids or lipopeptides and use thereof DICKENS, AMELIA NICOLE 80d overdue
18424594 MULTI-USER MULTI-GPU RENDER SERVER APPARATUS AND METHODS RICKS, DONNA J 59d overdue
16492987 TARGET DETECTION USING A MONOVALENT ANTIBODY ALLEN, MARIANNE P 49d overdue
17666730 FRICTIONAL TISSUE SAMPLING AND COLLECTION METHOD AND DEVICE TOWA, RENE T —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
PME IP PTY LTD 2
ACARYON GMBH 1
Histologics, LLC 1
NanoTag 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26181
16451
37911
16471

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19030289 APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR RULE BASED VISUALIZATION OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS AND OTHER VOLUMETRIC IMAGES Pme Ip Pty Ltd. SAJOUS, WESNER §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18424594 MULTI-USER MULTI-GPU RENDER SERVER APPARATUS AND METHODS Pme Ip Pty Ltd. RICKS, DONNA J 2618 §103 Final Rejection 59d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2024
17768138 Natural non-pathogenic microorganisms capable of associating glycolipids or lipopeptides and use thereof Acaryon GmbH DICKENS, AMELIA NICOLE 1645 §112 Final Rejection 80d overdue Pending Apr 11, 2022
17666730 FRICTIONAL TISSUE SAMPLING AND COLLECTION METHOD AND DEVICE Histologics, LLC TOWA, RENE T 3791 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 08, 2022
16492987 TARGET DETECTION USING A MONOVALENT ANTIBODY Nanotag Biotechnologies GmbH ALLEN, MARIANNE P 1647 §112 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Sep 11, 2019

Managing Sci-Law Strategies, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month