Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Sherman Ip LLP

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security • Communications

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 1 of 5 (20%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Sherman IP LLP focuses on the Chemistry & Materials technology area, having filed 1073 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate pct of 94.48. Currently, there are 4 pending office actions in its docket. The 1073 career applications show the firm's experience in the chemistry sector.

The average office actions per allowance for this profile is 4.9. This metric indicates that applications in the Chemistry & Materials field often require multiple rounds of prosecution to reach an allowance. The 94.48 resolved allowance rate pct is a benchmark for success for the 1073 career applications managed. With only 4 pending office actions, the firm's current active workload is focused. These data points provide a clear view of the firm's performance and its specialized focus on chemistry and materials technology.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1074 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

94.5%
Allowance Rate
n=1074
+0.65σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1074
4.9
OAs to Allowance
n=788
+0.63σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=788
1330 days
Time to Allowance
n=788
+3.0pp
Interview Lift
n=1074
48.9%
RCE Rate
n=1074
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=1074

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

91.3%
§101 Overcome
n=254
91.8%
§102 Overcome
n=366
93.1%
§103 Overcome
n=652
90.2%
§112 Overcome
n=297

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
41%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1074
2
Practitioners
n=1074
537.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1074

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
3
Communications
60% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCNALLY, MICHAEL S 1 89.9% +8.6%
KRZYSTAN, ALEXANDER J 1 81.3% +7.3%
TRIVISONNO, ANGELO 1 52.8% +25.8%
CAMMARATA, MICHAEL ROBERT 1 69.8% +34.6%
ISLAM, PROMOTTO TAJRIAN 1 76.4% +15.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18921616 COLLABORATION PLATFORM SYSTEM AND METHOD KRZYSTAN, ALEXANDER J —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18651397 INDIRECTIVE TEMPORAL FILTERING FOR ADAPTIVE JOINED PARAMETER SMOOTHING CAMMARATA, MICHAEL ROBERT 2d overdue
18959213 VERIFYING, MONITORING, AND TOKENIZING DIGITAL ASSETS AS PROOF OF OWNERSHIP AND VALUATION OF THE DIGITAL ASSETS MCNALLY, MICHAEL S 34d
18890397 SOLAR REFLECTOR FOR BIFACIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR PANELS TRIVISONNO, ANGELO 54d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18651397 INDIRECTIVE TEMPORAL FILTERING FOR ADAPTIVE JOINED PARAMETER SMOOTHING CAMMARATA, MICHAEL ROBERT 2d overdue
18890397 SOLAR REFLECTOR FOR BIFACIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR PANELS TRIVISONNO, ANGELO 54d
18304651 STANDARD DYNAMIC RANGE (SDR) TO HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE (HDR)INVERSE TONE MAPPING USING MACHINE LEARNING ISLAM, PROMOTTO TAJRIAN —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24321
26941
17221
26671
26691

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18959213 VERIFYING, MONITORING, AND TOKENIZING DIGITAL ASSETS AS PROOF OF OWNERSHIP AND VALUATION OF THE DIGITAL ASSETS Tulip Digital Asset Exchange, Inc. MCNALLY, MICHAEL S 2432 §101§103§112Other Non-Final OA 34d Pending Nov 25, 2024
18921616 COLLABORATION PLATFORM SYSTEM AND METHOD Xliv Collective Inc. KRZYSTAN, ALEXANDER J 2694 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 21, 2024
18890397 SOLAR REFLECTOR FOR BIFACIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR PANELS Sun And Steel Solar LLC TRIVISONNO, ANGELO 1722 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 54d Pending Sep 19, 2024
18651397 INDIRECTIVE TEMPORAL FILTERING FOR ADAPTIVE JOINED PARAMETER SMOOTHING Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. CAMMARATA, MICHAEL ROBERT 2667 §102§112 Non-Final OA 2d overdue AI Ready Apr 30, 2024
18304651 STANDARD DYNAMIC RANGE (SDR) TO HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE (HDR)INVERSE TONE MAPPING USING MACHINE LEARNING Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ISLAM, PROMOTTO TAJRIAN 2669 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 21, 2023

Managing Sherman Ip LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sherman Ip LLP's patent allowance rate?

94.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Sherman Ip LLP were allowed, across 1,074 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Sherman Ip LLP average before allowance?

4.93 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Sherman Ip LLP have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month