Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sierra Ip Law, Pc

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

This profile covers Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and has 8 pending office actions. Its career record includes 655 applications, with a resolved allowance rate of 78.81%. The data provides a current workload measure alongside a historical outcome measure.

The average of 2.6 office actions per allowance indicates the recorded prosecution interaction level for allowed matters. Practitioners can use the allowance rate when reviewing past results and the office-action average when planning effort, while keeping the pending docket distinct from resolved career outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=655 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

78.8%
Allowance Rate
n=655
+0.42σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=655
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=383
-0.49σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=383
756 days
Time to Allowance
n=383
+20.2pp
Interview Lift
n=655
18.1%
RCE Rate
n=655
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=655

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

56.5%
§101 Overcome
n=23
71.9%
§102 Overcome
n=153
70.6%
§103 Overcome
n=221
77.3%
§112 Overcome
n=242

Specialization & Scale

A01K, A63B, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
8%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=655
2
Practitioners
n=655
327.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=655

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HARCOURT, BRAD 2 84.3% +5.6%
REYES, REGINALD R 1 40.9% +31.5%
WAX, ROBERT A 1 25.7% +3.9%
GUMP, MICHAEL ANTHONY 1 64.4% +52.1%
NORRIS, CLAIRE A 1 66.0% +27.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18985084 TREE FRUIT OR NUT HARVESTER TO MINIMIZE MACHINE PASSES IN THE ORCHARD HARCOURT, BRAD —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19200668 HARVESTING APPARATUS INCLUDING A SHAKER HEAD AND BLOWER, AND RELATED METHODS HARCOURT, BRAD —
18865316 Membrane-forming composition, membrane-like composition, and use of same WAX, ROBERT A —
18786235 VACUUM HOSE PORT MOUNTING BRACKETS AND RELATED METHODS GUMP, MICHAEL ANTHONY —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18143052 MANUFACTURING PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AMMONIA FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTATE LIQUID NORRIS, CLAIRE A 45d overdue
19008253 DIGITAL HEALTH ROBOTIC SYSTEM FEATURING DIGITAL HEALTH ROBOT DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS REYES, REGINALD R 28d
18786235 VACUUM HOSE PORT MOUNTING BRACKETS AND RELATED METHODS GUMP, MICHAEL ANTHONY —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36742
36841
16151
37231
17791

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19200668 HARVESTING APPARATUS INCLUDING A SHAKER HEAD AND BLOWER, AND RELATED METHODS Flory Industries HARCOURT, BRAD 3674 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2025
19008253 DIGITAL HEALTH ROBOTIC SYSTEM FEATURING DIGITAL HEALTH ROBOT DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS Lyons Global, LLC REYES, REGINALD R 3684 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jan 02, 2025
18985084 TREE FRUIT OR NUT HARVESTER TO MINIMIZE MACHINE PASSES IN THE ORCHARD Flory Industries HARCOURT, BRAD 3674 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2024
18865316 Membrane-forming composition, membrane-like composition, and use of same Towa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. WAX, ROBERT A 1615 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18786235 VACUUM HOSE PORT MOUNTING BRACKETS AND RELATED METHODS Hide-A-Hose Of Washington LLC GUMP, MICHAEL ANTHONY 3723 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2024
18143052 MANUFACTURING PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AMMONIA FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTATE LIQUID Natural Ammonia Products, LLC NORRIS, CLAIRE A 1779 §112Other Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending May 03, 2023

Managing Sierra Ip Law, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sierra Ip Law, Pc's patent allowance rate?

78.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Sierra Ip Law, Pc were allowed, across 655 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Sierra Ip Law, Pc average before allowance?

2.60 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Sierra Ip Law, Pc have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month