Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 4 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RADKOWSKI, PETER | 2 | 76.0% | +8.4% |
| TO, TOAN C | 1 | 91.6% | -3.7% |
| LEPAGE, JONATHAN EVERETT | 1 | 51.0% | +32.8% |
| MIRZA, ADNAN M | 1 | 84.9% | +9.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17437387 | Device, System and Method for Modular Item Storage, Transportation and Delivery | MIRZA, ADNAN M | 7d |
| 18644219 | System and Method for Traversing Vertical Obstacles | TO, TOAN C | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17920362 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED CELL PROCESSING | LEPAGE, JONATHAN EVERETT | 105d overdue |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| STARSHIP TECHNOLOGIES OÜ | 2 |
| TELESCENT INC. | 2 |
| CELLUNITE GMBH | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2874 | 2 |
| 3614 | 1 |
| 1796 | 1 |
| 3667 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18644219 | System and Method for Traversing Vertical Obstacles | Starship Technologies Oü | TO, TOAN C | 3614 | §102 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Apr 24, 2024 |
| 18082433 | SYSTEM OF LARGE- SCALE ROBOTIC FIBER CROSS-CONNECTS USING MULTI-FIBER TRUNK RESERVATION | Telescent Inc. | RADKOWSKI, PETER | 2874 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 85d overdue | Pending | Dec 15, 2022 |
| 17920362 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED CELL PROCESSING | Cellunite GmbH | LEPAGE, JONATHAN EVERETT | 1796 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 105d overdue | Pending | Oct 20, 2022 |
| 17572357 | INCREMENTALLY SCALABLE, TWO-TIER SYSTEM OF ROBOTIC, FIBER OPTIC INTERCONNECT UNITS ENABLING ANY-TO-ANY CONNECTIVITY | Telescent, Inc. | RADKOWSKI, PETER | 2874 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 31d overdue | Pending | Jan 10, 2022 |
| 17437387 | Device, System and Method for Modular Item Storage, Transportation and Delivery | Starship Technologies Oü | MIRZA, ADNAN M | 3667 | §103 | Final Rejection | 7d | Pending | Sep 08, 2021 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial