Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Smith & Woldesenbet Law Group, Pllc

7 pending office actions • 1 client • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=124 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.3%
Allowance Rate
n=124
+0.38σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=124
2.0
OAs to Allowance
n=53
-0.65σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=53
736 days
Time to Allowance
n=53
-5.6pp
Interview Lift
n=124
15.0%
RCE Rate
n=124
2.0%
Appeal Rate
n=124

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=12 (min 20)
61.1%
§102 Overcome
n=36
60.8%
§103 Overcome
n=51
48.6%
§112 Overcome
n=35

Specialization & Scale

E21B, G01N, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
48%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=124
2
Practitioners
n=124
62.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=124

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
1
Medium (14%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§103 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (57%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. 1 71.5% +27.6%
BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S 1 62.3% +28.7%
SHORTER, RASHIDA R 1 18.0% +26.1%
DAVIS, RICHARD G 1 80.3% +18.1%
PAULSON, SHEETAL R. 1 39.2% +16.2%
GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 1 59.1% +23.1%
HUANG, RYAN 1 52.3% +31.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18863911 SUBSEA STRUCTURE MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS DAVIS, RICHARD G

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19102185 ENHANCED SUBSEA PRODUCTION RECOVERY USING SUBSEA JET PUMPS BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S 16d
19003930 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A CONFIGURATION DRIVEN PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINT FRAMEWORK SHORTER, RASHIDA R
18717394 Remote Inspection of Marine Vessels PAULSON, SHEETAL R.
18675907 CABLE PROTECTION APPARATUS GARFT, CHRISTOPHER
18319884 ENHANCING WATER CHEMISTRY FOR IMPROVED WELL PERFORMANCE HUANG, RYAN

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19479782 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMIZING THE STORAGE OF CARBON IN SUBTERRANEAN MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC ROCK FORMATIONS SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. 7d
19102185 ENHANCED SUBSEA PRODUCTION RECOVERY USING SUBSEA JET PUMPS BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S 16d
19003930 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A CONFIGURATION DRIVEN PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINT FRAMEWORK SHORTER, RASHIDA R
18863911 SUBSEA STRUCTURE MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS DAVIS, RICHARD G
18717394 Remote Inspection of Marine Vessels PAULSON, SHEETAL R.
18675907 CABLE PROTECTION APPARATUS GARFT, CHRISTOPHER
18319884 ENHANCING WATER CHEMISTRY FOR IMPROVED WELL PERFORMANCE HUANG, RYAN

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 7

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36741
37461
36261
36151
36321
17771

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19479782 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMIZING THE STORAGE OF CARBON IN SUBTERRANEAN MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC ROCK FORMATIONS Chevron U.S.A. Inc. SUE-AKO, ANDREW B. 3674 §112 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Oct 29, 2025
19102185 ENHANCED SUBSEA PRODUCTION RECOVERY USING SUBSEA JET PUMPS Chevron U.S.A. Inc. BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S 3746 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 16d Pending Feb 07, 2025
19003930 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A CONFIGURATION DRIVEN PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINT FRAMEWORK Chevron U.S.A. Inc. SHORTER, RASHIDA R 3626 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 27, 2024
18863911 SUBSEA STRUCTURE MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS Chevron U.S.A. Inc. DAVIS, RICHARD G §103 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 07, 2024
18717394 Remote Inspection of Marine Vessels Chevron U.S.A. Inc. PAULSON, SHEETAL R. 3615 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 06, 2024
18675907 CABLE PROTECTION APPARATUS Chevron U.S.A. Inc. GARFT, CHRISTOPHER 3632 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending May 28, 2024
18319884 ENHANCING WATER CHEMISTRY FOR IMPROVED WELL PERFORMANCE Chevron U.S.A. Inc. HUANG, RYAN 1777 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending May 18, 2023

Managing Smith & Woldesenbet Law Group, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month