Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Smith Ip Services, P.C.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

10 pending office actions • 3 clients • 9 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SMITH IP SERVICES, P.C. has 11 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The profile records 599 career applications, an 80.83% resolved allowance rate, and an average of 4.05 office actions per allowance.

The historical record includes a measurable allowance outcome and an average exceeding several examination exchanges before allowance. The current docket is limited in size, but each matter may warrant careful prosecution planning in light of the recorded examination activity.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=599 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

80.8%
Allowance Rate
n=599
+0.42σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=599
4.0
OAs to Allowance
n=333
+0.37σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=333
942 days
Time to Allowance
n=333
+11.2pp
Interview Lift
n=599
26.5%
RCE Rate
n=599
8.7%
Appeal Rate
n=599

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

68.2%
§101 Overcome
n=22
81.0%
§102 Overcome
n=226
80.1%
§103 Overcome
n=251
88.9%
§112 Overcome
n=144

Specialization & Scale

E21B, B60G, E02F
Top CPC Subclasses
48%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=599
1
Practitioners
n=599
599.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=599

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
3
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (30%)
6
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (20%)
§103 only5 (50%)
Double-patenting only1 (10%)
Double-patenting + other1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
90% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAMBE, PATRICK F 2 62.5% +29.0%
WALLACE, KIPP CHARLES 1 78.3% +25.5%
YAO, THEODORE N 1 66.7% +39.0%
HALL, KRISTYN A 1 82.1% -5.9%
AHMED, MOBEEN 1 61.3% +8.4%
GRAY, GEORGE STERLING 1 75.3% +10.0%
ALAM, MIRZA F 1 74.4% +33.9%
SAYRE, JAMES G 1 84.0% +12.9%
BOCHNA, DAVID 1 79.9% +13.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19304016 MOBILE RIG TO WELL SECUREMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD HALL, KRISTYN A —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18943094 PUMPING UNIT INSPECTION SENSOR ASSEMBLY, SYSTEM AND METHOD ALAM, MIRZA F 22d overdue
18891667 COILED TUBING CONVEYED ELECTRICAL ORIENTER SAYRE, JAMES G 5d
18904605 TUBULAR RUNNING OPERATIONS WITH FREQUENCY SPECTRUM ANALYSIS LAMBE, PATRICK F —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18943094 PUMPING UNIT INSPECTION SENSOR ASSEMBLY, SYSTEM AND METHOD ALAM, MIRZA F 22d overdue
18891667 COILED TUBING CONVEYED ELECTRICAL ORIENTER SAYRE, JAMES G 5d
18662614 ELEVATOR FOR TUBULAR HANDLING LAMBE, PATRICK F 36d
19445189 PLUGGING DEVICE DEPLOYMENT IN SUBTERRANEAN WELLS WALLACE, KIPP CHARLES —
19313527 PROGRESSIVE CAVITY ASSEMBLY AND ASSOCIATED METHODS YAO, THEODORE N —
19024171 FLOW DIVERSION IN MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING OPERATIONS GRAY, GEORGE STERLING —
18904605 TUBULAR RUNNING OPERATIONS WITH FREQUENCY SPECTRUM ANALYSIS LAMBE, PATRICK F —
18416474 TUBULAR CONNECTION CONTROL USING DETECTABLE FEATURE BOCHNA, DAVID —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36764
36722
36741
37311
26881
36791

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19445189 PLUGGING DEVICE DEPLOYMENT IN SUBTERRANEAN WELLS Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. WALLACE, KIPP CHARLES 3674 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 09, 2026
19313527 PROGRESSIVE CAVITY ASSEMBLY AND ASSOCIATED METHODS Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. YAO, THEODORE N 3676 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2025
19304016 MOBILE RIG TO WELL SECUREMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. HALL, KRISTYN A 3672 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 19, 2025
19050753 AUTOMATED BOX OPENER SYSTEM AND METHOD Design & Assembly Concepts, Inc. AHMED, MOBEEN 3731 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 11, 2025
19024171 FLOW DIVERSION IN MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING OPERATIONS Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC GRAY, GEORGE STERLING 3676 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 16, 2025
18943094 PUMPING UNIT INSPECTION SENSOR ASSEMBLY, SYSTEM AND METHOD Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC ALAM, MIRZA F 2688 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending Nov 11, 2024
18904605 TUBULAR RUNNING OPERATIONS WITH FREQUENCY SPECTRUM ANALYSIS Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC LAMBE, PATRICK F 3676 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 02, 2024
18891667 COILED TUBING CONVEYED ELECTRICAL ORIENTER Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. SAYRE, JAMES G 3672 §102§103 Final Rejection 5d Pending Sep 20, 2024
18662614 ELEVATOR FOR TUBULAR HANDLING Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC LAMBE, PATRICK F 3676 §103 Final Rejection 36d Pending May 13, 2024
18416474 TUBULAR CONNECTION CONTROL USING DETECTABLE FEATURE Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC BOCHNA, DAVID 3679 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 18, 2024

Managing Smith Ip Services, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Smith Ip Services, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

80.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Smith Ip Services, P.C. were allowed, across 599 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Smith Ip Services, P.C. average before allowance?

4.05 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Smith Ip Services, P.C. have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 9 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month