Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Stoel Rives LLP - Sea

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 4 clients • 9 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

STOEL RIVES LLP - SEA focuses on Computing & Software and has 9830 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate pct of 85.03. This rate reflects the firm's historical success in securing allowances for its clients across its 9830 career applications.

The firm averages 3.2 office actions per allowance, which quantifies the typical prosecution effort for each granted patent. Currently, there are 10 pending office actions. This current workload is managed within the context of the firm's broader experience in the Computing & Software technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=9830 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.0%
Allowance Rate
n=9830
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=9830
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=5773
-0.23σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=5773
1076 days
Time to Allowance
n=5773
+7.9pp
Interview Lift
n=9830
25.3%
RCE Rate
n=9830
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=9830

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

76.3%
§101 Overcome
n=722
80.0%
§102 Overcome
n=2297
80.2%
§103 Overcome
n=3719
80.5%
§112 Overcome
n=2434

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, A61F
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=9830
43
Practitioners
n=9830
228.6
Apps / Practitioner
n=9830

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (40%)
5
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (10%)
§103 only5 (50%)
Double-patenting only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (30%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
50% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
2
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SKHOUN, HICHAM 2 77.1% +5.5%
CHRISTENSEN, SCOTT B 1 77.8% +32.5%
PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F 1 77.8% +13.0%
CLARK, RYAN T 1 50.4% +18.2%
RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE 1 77.7% +7.3%
TURCHEN, ROCHELLE DEANNA 1 57.5% +29.0%
SHAH, PRIYANK J 1 68.0% +17.9%
SHAH, VAISHALI 1 57.4% +53.2%
BREENE, PAUL J 1 61.8% +15.4%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19071587 FILE ANALYTICS SYSTEMS INCLUDING EXAMPLES PROVIDING METRICS ADJUSTED FOR APPLICATION OPERATION SKHOUN, HICHAM 76d
18641059 METHODS, SYSTEM AND APPARATUSES FOR THE INDUCTION AND REGULATION OF IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSES BY TISSUE ABLATION VIA PERMEABILIZATION OF CELL MEMBRANES AND ELECTROLYSIS CLARK, RYAN T —
18693357 FLEXIBLE BRIDGE ABUTMENT RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE —
18160264 AUGMENTED REALITY HEADSET SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL PLANNING AND GUIDANCE SHAH, PRIYANK J —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18069920 ENUMERATION FOR DISTRIBUTED FILE SERVERS SHAH, VAISHALI 45d overdue
18160280 AUGMENTED REALITY HEADSET SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL PLANNING AND GUIDANCE FOR KNEE SURGERY TURCHEN, ROCHELLE DEANNA 38d overdue
18930885 PLATFORM-AS-A-SERVICE DEPLOYMENT INCLUDING SERVICE DOMAINS CHRISTENSEN, SCOTT B 14d
18929359 METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUSES FOR TISSUE ABLATION USING A MODULATED EXPONENTIAL DECAY PULSE PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F —
18641059 METHODS, SYSTEM AND APPARATUSES FOR THE INDUCTION AND REGULATION OF IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSES BY TISSUE ABLATION VIA PERMEABILIZATION OF CELL MEMBRANES AND ELECTROLYSIS CLARK, RYAN T —
18160264 AUGMENTED REALITY HEADSET SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL PLANNING AND GUIDANCE SHAH, PRIYANK J —
16522567 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DEPOYING A MACHINE LEARNING INFERENCE AS A SERVICE AT SYSTEMS BREENE, PAUL J —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Nutanix 5
Inter Science GmbH 2
PolarisAR, Inc. 2
Laing O'Rourke PLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21642
24441
37941
37971
26261
21561
21291

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19071587 FILE ANALYTICS SYSTEMS INCLUDING EXAMPLES PROVIDING METRICS ADJUSTED FOR APPLICATION OPERATION Nutanix, Inc. SKHOUN, HICHAM 2164 §101 Non-Final OA 76d Pending Mar 05, 2025
18930885 PLATFORM-AS-A-SERVICE DEPLOYMENT INCLUDING SERVICE DOMAINS Nutanix, Inc. CHRISTENSEN, SCOTT B 2444 §103Other Final Rejection 14d Pending Oct 29, 2024
18929359 METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUSES FOR TISSUE ABLATION USING A MODULATED EXPONENTIAL DECAY PULSE Inter Science GmbH PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18641059 METHODS, SYSTEM AND APPARATUSES FOR THE INDUCTION AND REGULATION OF IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSES BY TISSUE ABLATION VIA PERMEABILIZATION OF CELL MEMBRANES AND ELECTROLYSIS Inter Science GmbH CLARK, RYAN T 3794 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18693357 FLEXIBLE BRIDGE ABUTMENT Laing O'Rourke PLC RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 19, 2024
18160280 AUGMENTED REALITY HEADSET SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL PLANNING AND GUIDANCE FOR KNEE SURGERY Polarisar, Inc. TURCHEN, ROCHELLE DEANNA 3797 §103 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2023
18160264 AUGMENTED REALITY HEADSET SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL PLANNING AND GUIDANCE Polarisar, Inc. SHAH, PRIYANK J 2626 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 26, 2023
18069920 ENUMERATION FOR DISTRIBUTED FILE SERVERS Nutanix, Inc. SHAH, VAISHALI 2156 §103 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Dec 21, 2022
17452144 MALICIOUS ACTIVITY DETECTION AND REMEDIATION IN VIRTUALIZED FILE SERVERS Nutanix, Inc. SKHOUN, HICHAM 2164 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2021
16522567 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DEPOYING A MACHINE LEARNING INFERENCE AS A SERVICE AT SYSTEMS Nutanix, Inc. BREENE, PAUL J 2129 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2019

Managing Stoel Rives LLP - Sea's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month