Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The H.T. Than Law Group

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

6 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

THE H.T. THAN LAW GROUP focuses on Chemistry & Materials, with 542 career applications and 6 pending office actions. The resolved allowance rate is 86.39%, providing a favorable allowance outcome within the recorded prosecution history.

Allowed matters average 3.49 office actions. That measure suggests that examination often continues through multiple responses before resolution, so practitioners may need to budget for sustained claim negotiation rather than assume early disposition. The pending docket adds a current workload signal, while the application total gives scale to the outcome rate.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=542 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.4%
Allowance Rate
n=542
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=542
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=381
-0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=381
1057 days
Time to Allowance
n=381
+6.1pp
Interview Lift
n=542
27.4%
RCE Rate
n=542
0.4%
Appeal Rate
n=542

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.8%
§101 Overcome
n=22
81.0%
§102 Overcome
n=153
80.4%
§103 Overcome
n=271
81.6%
§112 Overcome
n=239

Specialization & Scale

C09D, H05B, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=542
1
Practitioners
n=542
542.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=542

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other3 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CAI, WENWEN 2 59.9% +19.4%
CARTER, TARA ROSE E 1 80.7% +9.7%
PENG, CHARLIE YU 1 75.5% +13.1%
PEPITONE, MICHAEL F 1 74.4% +22.0%
CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C 1 59.7% +18.5%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19065730 CANNULA WITH IMPELLER PUMP, PERISTALTIC PUMP AND OTHER PUMPS CARTER, TARA ROSE E —
18857608 AN INTEGRATED ELECTRO-OPTICAL ABSORPTION MODULATOR PENG, CHARLIE YU —
18546840 PASTEURIZATION OF ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS WITH ELEVATED HEAT AND METHODS THEREFOR CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18857608 AN INTEGRATED ELECTRO-OPTICAL ABSORPTION MODULATOR PENG, CHARLIE YU —
18689601 STAIN BLOCKING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS WITH CATIONIC RESIN AND NONIONIC RESIN BLENDS CAI, WENWEN —
18689659 NONIONIC RESINS AND THEIR USES IN STAIN BLOCKING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS CAI, WENWEN —
18689641 NONIONIC RESINS, AND MIXTURES OF NONIONIC RESINS WITH CATIONIC ADDITIVES FOR STAIN BLOCKING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS PEPITONE, MICHAEL F —
18546840 PASTEURIZATION OF ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS WITH ELEVATED HEAT AND METHODS THEREFOR CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Columbia Insurance 3
Edward J. Mikol 1
IMEC 1
Benjamin Moore & Co. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17632
37731
28741
17671
17741

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19065730 CANNULA WITH IMPELLER PUMP, PERISTALTIC PUMP AND OTHER PUMPS Edward J. Mikol CARTER, TARA ROSE E 3773 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2025
18857608 AN INTEGRATED ELECTRO-OPTICAL ABSORPTION MODULATOR Imec Vzw PENG, CHARLIE YU 2874 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 17, 2024
18689601 STAIN BLOCKING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS WITH CATIONIC RESIN AND NONIONIC RESIN BLENDS Columbia Insurance Company CAI, WENWEN 1763 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2024
18689659 NONIONIC RESINS AND THEIR USES IN STAIN BLOCKING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS Columbia Insurance Company CAI, WENWEN 1763 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2024
18689641 NONIONIC RESINS, AND MIXTURES OF NONIONIC RESINS WITH CATIONIC ADDITIVES FOR STAIN BLOCKING ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS Benjamin Moore & Co. PEPITONE, MICHAEL F 1767 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2024
18546840 PASTEURIZATION OF ARCHITECTURAL COMPOSITIONS WITH ELEVATED HEAT AND METHODS THEREFOR Columbia Insurance Company CLEVELAND, TIMOTHY C 1774 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 17, 2023

Managing The H.T. Than Law Group's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The H.T. Than Law Group's patent allowance rate?

86.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by The H.T. Than Law Group were allowed, across 542 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does The H.T. Than Law Group average before allowance?

3.49 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does The H.T. Than Law Group have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month