Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Tomlinson Mckinstry, P.C.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 3 clients • 11 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Tomlinson McKinstry, P.C. works in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and has 12 pending office actions. Its career record includes 1284 applications, a resolved allowance rate of 91.52%, and an average of 2.63 office actions per allowance.

The profile combines a substantial application history with current docket activity. The resolved allowance rate supplies an outcome measure, while the office-action average indicates the examination effort associated with allowed cases. Those measures are historical and should not be assumed to predict every pending matter. For practitioners, the data supports evaluating both experience in the technology area and the relationship between prosecution activity and resolved allowances.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1284 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.5%
Allowance Rate
n=1284
+0.56σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1284
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=734
-0.52σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=734
783 days
Time to Allowance
n=734
+5.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1284
10.6%
RCE Rate
n=1284
4.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1284

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

87.0%
§101 Overcome
n=23
85.3%
§102 Overcome
n=307
87.4%
§103 Overcome
n=459
88.3%
§112 Overcome
n=324

Specialization & Scale

E21B, F04B, E02F
Top CPC Subclasses
41%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1284
1
Practitioners
n=1284
1284.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1284

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (18%)
6
Medium (55%)
3
Easy (27%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (27%)
§102 only2 (18%)
§112 only3 (27%)
Double-patenting + other1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (18%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
9% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
18% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
73% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BASTIANELLI, JOHN 1 73.4% +28.2%
AYALA DELGADO, ANTHONY 1 79.7% +17.1%
JARIWALA, CHIRAG 1 62.1% +27.5%
BELLINGER, JASON R 1 70.0% +18.7%
KEENAN, JAMES W 1 66.9% +24.2%
BARRON, JEREMIAH JOHN 1 79.4% +3.6%
REINERT, JONATHAN E 1 85.1% +1.7%
SHAKERI, HADI 1 62.2% +36.8%
COURSON, TANIA C 1 65.0% +27.8%
KASTURE, DNYANESH G 1 48.0% +26.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18655572 VIRTUAL PATH GUIDANCE SYSTEM REINERT, JONATHAN E —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19073550 FLUID END WITH THREADED DYNAMIC SECTION JARIWALA, CHIRAG —
18807381 BEACON OPTIMIZATION BARRON, JEREMIAH JOHN —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18524993 INTEGRATED PIPE LOCATING AND MARKING SYSTEM COURSON, TANIA C 27d
18441097 WRENCH WITH OVER-CENTER JAWS SHAKERI, HADI 34d
19193599 ISOLATION GAP IN FLUID END DYNAMIC BODY AYALA DELGADO, ANTHONY 39d
18334701 MULTI-PIECE FLUID END KASTURE, DNYANESH G 70d
19442146 SEALING HIGH PRESSURE FLOW DEVICES BASTIANELLI, JOHN —
19073550 FLUID END WITH THREADED DYNAMIC SECTION JARIWALA, CHIRAG —
19049491 TRACK TENSIONING SYSTEM BELLINGER, JASON R —
19037729 MULTI-USE TRAILER KEENAN, JAMES W —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37463
37531
36151
36551
28581
36681
37231
28551
17721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19442146 SEALING HIGH PRESSURE FLOW DEVICES Kerr Machine Co. BASTIANELLI, JOHN 3753 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 07, 2026
19193599 ISOLATION GAP IN FLUID END DYNAMIC BODY Kerr Machine Co. AYALA DELGADO, ANTHONY 3746 §102 Non-Final OA 39d Pending Apr 29, 2025
19073550 FLUID END WITH THREADED DYNAMIC SECTION Kerr Machine Co. JARIWALA, CHIRAG 3746 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2025
19049491 TRACK TENSIONING SYSTEM The Charles Machine Works, Inc. BELLINGER, JASON R 3615 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 10, 2025
19037729 MULTI-USE TRAILER Magness Equipment, LLC KEENAN, JAMES W 3655 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 27, 2025
18807381 BEACON OPTIMIZATION The Charles Machine Works, Inc. BARRON, JEREMIAH JOHN 2858 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 16, 2024
18655572 VIRTUAL PATH GUIDANCE SYSTEM The Charles Machine Works, Inc. REINERT, JONATHAN E 3668 §112 Final Rejection — Pending May 06, 2024
18441097 WRENCH WITH OVER-CENTER JAWS The Charles Machine Works, Inc. SHAKERI, HADI 3723 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Feb 14, 2024
18524993 INTEGRATED PIPE LOCATING AND MARKING SYSTEM The Charles Machine Works, Inc. COURSON, TANIA C 2855 §102 Final Rejection 27d Pending Nov 30, 2023
18334701 MULTI-PIECE FLUID END Kerr Machine Co. KASTURE, DNYANESH G 3746 §103 Final Rejection 70d Pending Jun 14, 2023
18078768 MULTI-CYCLONE VACUUM EXCAVATION SYSTEM The Charles Machine Works, Inc. JEONG, YOUNGSUL 1772 §103 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Dec 09, 2022

Managing Tomlinson Mckinstry, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tomlinson Mckinstry, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

91.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Tomlinson Mckinstry, P.C. were allowed, across 1,284 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Tomlinson Mckinstry, P.C. average before allowance?

2.63 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Tomlinson Mckinstry, P.C. have?

11 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 11 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month