Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Trenam Law (Ucf Matters)

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Computing & Software • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 5 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=3261 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.1%
Allowance Rate
n=3261
+0.77σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=3261
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=1671
-0.65σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1671
887 days
Time to Allowance
n=1671
+10.0pp
Interview Lift
n=3261
19.2%
RCE Rate
n=3261
1.7%
Appeal Rate
n=3261

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

83.3%
§101 Overcome
n=150
85.2%
§102 Overcome
n=426
84.6%
§103 Overcome
n=715
86.7%
§112 Overcome
n=593

Specialization & Scale

G06F, A61K, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=3261
0
Practitioners
n=3261
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=3261 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only2 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
25% of docket
3
Information Tech
38% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ABAD, FARLEY J 1 86.3% +5.3%
ROZOF, TIMOTHY R 1 72.7% +23.3%
HUANG, RYAN 1 53.1% +31.1%
BALDWIN, RANDALL KERN 1 80.0% +27.2%
SOROUSH, LAYLA 1 40.5% +43.4%
JUNG, DONG YOON 1 — —
CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN 1 21.7% +85.7%
CHATRATHI, ARJUNA P 1 62.0% +22.3%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19190418 Programmable Stacked Processor with Simultaneous Execution of all Program Steps Over a Data Stream ABAD, FARLEY J —
18830799 NANOFILTRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING PRETREATMENT WITH GREEN SORPTION MEDIA HUANG, RYAN —
18420200 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH REASONING SYSTEMS USING SELF-SUPERVISED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING AND METHODS THEREOF BALDWIN, RANDALL KERN —
18495265 COMPOSITION OF AND METHOD FOR TREATING INJURY AND/OR SKIN CONDITIONS SOROUSH, LAYLA —
18321149 APPENDAGE WORK SHARING APPARATUS CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18920409 TOPICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR REDUCING SCARRING ROZOF, TIMOTHY R —
18830799 NANOFILTRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING PRETREATMENT WITH GREEN SORPTION MEDIA HUANG, RYAN —
18420200 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH REASONING SYSTEMS USING SELF-SUPERVISED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING AND METHODS THEREOF BALDWIN, RANDALL KERN —
18495265 COMPOSITION OF AND METHOD FOR TREATING INJURY AND/OR SKIN CONDITIONS SOROUSH, LAYLA —
18321149 APPENDAGE WORK SHARING APPARATUS CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN —
17802842 POST-OPERATIVE SURGICAL SITE WOUND TREATMENT AND METHOD FOR DEVICE REMOVAL CHATRATHI, ARJUNA P —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21811
16251
21251
16221
21451
37851
37811

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19190418 Programmable Stacked Processor with Simultaneous Execution of all Program Steps Over a Data Stream Gigantor Technologies, Inc. ABAD, FARLEY J 2181 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 25, 2025
18920409 TOPICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR REDUCING SCARRING Omeza Holdings, Inc. ROZOF, TIMOTHY R 1625 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2024
18830799 NANOFILTRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING PRETREATMENT WITH GREEN SORPTION MEDIA UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. HUANG, RYAN §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2024
18420200 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH REASONING SYSTEMS USING SELF-SUPERVISED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING AND METHODS THEREOF Google LLC BALDWIN, RANDALL KERN 2125 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 23, 2024
18495265 COMPOSITION OF AND METHOD FOR TREATING INJURY AND/OR SKIN CONDITIONS Omeza Holdings, Inc. SOROUSH, LAYLA 1622 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 26, 2023
18456258 UNKNOWN-CLASS (OUT-OF-DISTRIBUTION) DATA DETECTION IN MACHINE LEARNING MODELS UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. JUNG, DONG YOON 2145 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 25, 2023
18321149 APPENDAGE WORK SHARING APPARATUS UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN 3785 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2023
17802842 POST-OPERATIVE SURGICAL SITE WOUND TREATMENT AND METHOD FOR DEVICE REMOVAL The Regents of the University of Colorado CHATRATHI, ARJUNA P 3781 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 26, 2022

Managing Trenam Law (Ucf Matters)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Trenam Law (Ucf Matters)'s patent allowance rate?

88.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Trenam Law (Ucf Matters) were allowed, across 3,261 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Trenam Law (Ucf Matters) average before allowance?

2.41 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Trenam Law (Ucf Matters) have?

8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 8 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month