Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ultimatedge Ip Law Group, P.C.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

8 pending office actions • 7 clients • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

UltimatEdge IP Law Group, P.C. has managed 619 career applications, primarily within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 86.61 percent. This rate provides a benchmark for its historical success in securing patent grants within the life sciences sector.

On average, the firm experiences 2.81 office actions per allowance. This metric indicates that the prosecution process involves multiple rounds of negotiation with the patent office. There are currently 7 pending office actions requiring attention, which constitute the firm's immediate workload for active cases.

The combination of 619 career applications and an 86.61 percent allowance rate defines the firm's track record. Practitioners can use the 2.81 office actions per allowance to estimate the expected duration of future Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals filings. These data points illustrate the firm's experience in its primary technical field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=619 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.6%
Allowance Rate
n=619
+0.83σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=619
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=375
-0.49σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=375
867 days
Time to Allowance
n=375
+13.8pp
Interview Lift
n=619
23.6%
RCE Rate
n=619
0.3%
Appeal Rate
n=619

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.0%
§101 Overcome
n=32
73.7%
§102 Overcome
n=118
76.4%
§103 Overcome
n=229
81.2%
§112 Overcome
n=202

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61F, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
29%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=619
1
Practitioners
n=619
619.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=619

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (25%)
6
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
Double-patenting + other3 (38%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
62% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
12% of docket
2
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 2 55.4% +46.2%
THOMPSON, CURTIS A 1 60.8% +52.7%
BOWERS, ERIN M 1 54.7% +10.6%
BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 1 23.8% +56.9%
HARTMANN, GARY S 1 72.7% +18.9%
FULTON, MICHAEL TIMOTHY 1 70.4% +5.9%
PETRITSCH, AMANDA MICHELLE 1 57.1% +28.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18392498 Reducing or Inhibiting Ocular Damage by Hyaluronidase Administration BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 29d overdue
19385776 Planar Motor Transport and System for Scalable, Multi-Purpose Lab Automation with Distributed Control Architecture and Temporal Reservation Management THOMPSON, CURTIS A —
18487680 Selectively Frictionally Engaged Hole Cover HARTMANN, GARY S —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18392498 Reducing or Inhibiting Ocular Damage by Hyaluronidase Administration BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 29d overdue
18693468 Reducing or Inhibiting Tissue Damage Using Hyaluronidase Administration BOWERS, ERIN M 3d overdue
19385776 Planar Motor Transport and System for Scalable, Multi-Purpose Lab Automation with Distributed Control Architecture and Temporal Reservation Management THOMPSON, CURTIS A —
18978365 Self-Retaining Implantable Drug Delivery Device TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V —
18847245 Compositions Having Improved Bioavailability of Therapeutics and Uses Thereof TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V —
18487680 Selectively Frictionally Engaged Hole Cover HARTMANN, GARY S —
17596570 Compositions, Kits, Methods and Uses for Preventing Microbial Growth PETRITSCH, AMANDA MICHELLE —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17981
16531
16571
36711
17471
16121

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19385776 Planar Motor Transport and System for Scalable, Multi-Purpose Lab Automation with Distributed Control Architecture and Temporal Reservation Management Lab Sync Inc. THOMPSON, CURTIS A 1798 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 11, 2025
18978365 Self-Retaining Implantable Drug Delivery Device Goldenbiotech, LLC TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2024
18847245 Compositions Having Improved Bioavailability of Therapeutics and Uses Thereof Trx Biosciences Limited TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 14, 2024
18693468 Reducing or Inhibiting Tissue Damage Using Hyaluronidase Administration Med Progress, LLC BOWERS, ERIN M 1653 §103DP Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Mar 19, 2024
18392498 Reducing or Inhibiting Ocular Damage by Hyaluronidase Administration Med Progress, LLC BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 1657 §103 Final Rejection 29d overdue Pending Dec 21, 2023
18487680 Selectively Frictionally Engaged Hole Cover Clover Equipment, LLC HARTMANN, GARY S 3671 §101DP Final Rejection — Pending Oct 16, 2023
18031109 A DEVICE AND A METHOD FOR VAPORISING A VOLATILE MATERIAL Inflowvent Ltd. FULTON, MICHAEL TIMOTHY 1747 §103 Final Rejection 66d overdue Pending Apr 10, 2023
17596570 Compositions, Kits, Methods and Uses for Preventing Microbial Growth Collidion, Inc. PETRITSCH, AMANDA MICHELLE 1612 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 13, 2021

Managing Ultimatedge Ip Law Group, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month