Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

21 pending office actions • 11 clients • 19 examiners • 18 art units • 0 of 21 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP operates in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and reports 1443 career applications. Its current profile includes 22 pending office actions, indicating an active unresolved workload. The resolved allowance rate is 86.92%, showing that a substantial share of resolved applications reached allowance.

Allowances average 3.04 office actions. This indicates that successful matters typically involve several examination events, even with the recorded allowance rate. For practitioners, the application base and pending docket provide measures of scale and current activity, while the allowance rate and action average separate outcome from prosecution effort. That distinction is useful when evaluating expected examination demands for new matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1443 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.9%
Allowance Rate
n=1443
+0.66σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1443
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=844
-0.35σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=844
1062 days
Time to Allowance
n=844
+10.0pp
Interview Lift
n=1443
22.4%
RCE Rate
n=1443
2.7%
Appeal Rate
n=1443

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

78.3%
§101 Overcome
n=129
79.7%
§102 Overcome
n=325
79.1%
§103 Overcome
n=575
81.4%
§112 Overcome
n=458

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, G01N
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1443
2
Practitioners
n=1443
721.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=1443

Portfolio Summary

21
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (57%)
8
Medium (38%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (5%)
§101 + other3 (14%)
§103 only7 (33%)
§112 only1 (5%)
Double-patenting + other1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)8 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

9
Life Sciences
43% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
52% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

210 h
Manual time on pending OAs
42 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
74 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROBINSON, HOPE A 2 67.7% +43.0%
TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI 2 39.4% +46.0%
XU, JUSTIN 1 60.7% +35.8%
KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 1 27.0% +31.7%
RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L 1 44.9% +16.7%
ZHAI, KYLE 1 75.2% +18.3%
STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 1 61.5% -7.1%
FERENCE, JAMES M 1 71.2% +16.8%
COHEN, MICHAEL P 1 58.9% +27.3%
PURDY, KYLE A 1 41.0% +35.7%

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18576040 SEALING DEVICE, GARBAGE CAN BODY AND GARBAGE CAN VOLZ, ELIZABETH J 162d overdue
18329130 METHODS FOR DETECTING ZEROVALENT NANOPARTICLE-MEDIATED OXIDATIVE STRESS IN CYANOBACTERIA IANNUZO, NATALIE NMN 22d
18430193 Composition and Method for Increasing Fatty Acid Production in Cyanobacteria by Altering Cell Membrane Permeability ROBINSON, HOPE A 86d
19079829 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE —
18869478 IMAGE PROCESSING ZHAI, KYLE —
18839284 A process for the Preparation Nitrile Herbicides, their Esters and Salts COHEN, MICHAEL P —
18806301 SUPPORTED DRUG FORMULATIONS SHOWING CONTROLLED DRUG RELEASE, AND A METHOD FOR THEIR PREPARATION PURDY, KYLE A —
18786008 METHOD TO ASSESS GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PERFORMANCE SINGH, RUPANGINI —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17501396 SOFT-SIDED CONTAINER WITH HANGING SUSPENSION TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI 28d
17069946 SOFT-SIDED CONTAINER WITH HANGING SUSPENSION TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI 54d
18430193 Composition and Method for Increasing Fatty Acid Production in Cyanobacteria by Altering Cell Membrane Permeability ROBINSON, HOPE A 86d
19095682 Methods to Diagnose Small and Large Fiber Neuropathy XU, JUSTIN —
19079829 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE —
19005152 CONTROLLED INVENTORY REFRIGERATED DISPENSING SYSTEM RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L —
18869478 IMAGE PROCESSING ZHAI, KYLE —
18846168 GRID STRUCTURE DISMANTLING METHOD FERENCE, JAMES M —

Client Portfolio (11 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37333
16522
37911
36871
36511
26111
36581
36351
16121
16111

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19095682 Methods to Diagnose Small and Large Fiber Neuropathy Morgan State University XU, JUSTIN 3791 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 31, 2025
19079829 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION Morgan State University KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 3687 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 14, 2025
19005152 CONTROLLED INVENTORY REFRIGERATED DISPENSING SYSTEM Minibar Systems RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L 3651 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18869478 IMAGE PROCESSING Nick Ager ZHAI, KYLE 2611 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18294345 ROBOT SORTING METHOD BASED ON VISUAL RECOGNITION AND STORAGE MEDIUM China Construction Steel Structure Guangdong Co., Ltd. STIEBRITZ, NOAH WILLIAM 3658 §103 Non-Final OA 49d Pending Sep 20, 2024
18846168 GRID STRUCTURE DISMANTLING METHOD China Construction Steel Structure Co., Ltd. FERENCE, JAMES M 3635 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2024
18839284 A process for the Preparation Nitrile Herbicides, their Esters and Salts Gharda Chemicals Limited COHEN, MICHAEL P 1612 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 16, 2024
18806301 SUPPORTED DRUG FORMULATIONS SHOWING CONTROLLED DRUG RELEASE, AND A METHOD FOR THEIR PREPARATION Morgan State University PURDY, KYLE A 1611 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 15, 2024
18786008 METHOD TO ASSESS GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PERFORMANCE Morgan State University SINGH, RUPANGINI 3628 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2024
18765978 Method and Device for Detecting Presence, Concentration, and Antibiotic Resistance of Bacteria in Urine Samples Astek Diagnostics Inc. CELSA, BENNETT M 1600 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 08, 2024
18615128 MEDICINAL MUSHROOM-INFUSED TOPICAL COMPOSITION FOR TATTOO AFTERCARE Cynthia Gomez SPAINE, ROBERT FRANKLIN 1655 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 25, 2024
18592932 Methods and Compositions for Increasing Bio-products in Cyanobacteria using Low-Dose Antibiotics Morgan State University ROBINSON, HOPE A 1652 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 01, 2024
18430193 Composition and Method for Increasing Fatty Acid Production in Cyanobacteria by Altering Cell Membrane Permeability Morgan State University ROBINSON, HOPE A 1652 §102§112 Non-Final OA 86d Pending Feb 01, 2024
18576040 SEALING DEVICE, GARBAGE CAN BODY AND GARBAGE CAN Huanjiu Lu VOLZ, ELIZABETH J 3733 §102§103 Non-Final OA 162d overdue Pending Jan 02, 2024
18498342 Gas Flow Chamber Device and Method of ATR Infrared Spectroscopy for Monitoring Chemical Reactions in Controlled Environments Morgan State University XU, XIAOYUN 1797 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2023
18329130 METHODS FOR DETECTING ZEROVALENT NANOPARTICLE-MEDIATED OXIDATIVE STRESS IN CYANOBACTERIA Morgan State University IANNUZO, NATALIE NMN 1653 §103§112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jun 05, 2023
18303170 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETECTING SICKLE CELL DISEASE USING DEEP TRANSFER LEARNING Morgan State University STRIEGEL, THEODORE CHARLES 1685 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2023
18167475 MODULAR, PERCUTANEOUS DUAL-LUMEN CANNULA SYSTEM The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research HALL, DEANNA K 3783 §103 Non-Final OA 5d Pending Feb 10, 2023
18069539 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN PATIENTS AND MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS Morgan State University CHOI, PETER H 3685 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 21, 2022
17501396 SOFT-SIDED CONTAINER WITH HANGING SUSPENSION California Innovations Inc. TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI 3733 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Oct 14, 2021
17069946 SOFT-SIDED CONTAINER WITH HANGING SUSPENSION California Innovations Inc. TAMIL, JESSICA KAVINI 3733 §103 Final Rejection 54d Pending Oct 14, 2020

Managing Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP's patent allowance rate?

86.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP were allowed, across 1,443 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP average before allowance?

3.04 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP have?

21 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 11 clients, before 19 examiners in 18 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month