Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Wideband Ip Office

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

7 pending office actions • 1 client • 6 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Wideband IP Office handles patent prosecution in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, with 146 career applications on record. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 67.03 percent. Its prosecution history shows an average of 2.79 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm is managing 5 pending office actions.

The 146 career applications and 67.03 percent allowance rate establish the firm's historical performance in this sector. The 2.79 average helps practitioners understand the typical procedural requirements for reaching an allowance. With 5 pending office actions, the firm maintains its presence in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. This data set reflects the firm's documented experience and current workload within the patent office. The recorded metrics provide a baseline for procedural duration in this specific field. Practitioners can evaluate the intensity of examiner interaction and resource requirements based on these historical figures. These statistics offer a view of the firm's prosecution profile.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=146 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

67.0%
Allowance Rate
n=146
+0.56σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=146
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=61
-0.56σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=61
859 days
Time to Allowance
n=61
+26.1pp
Interview Lift
n=146
29.7%
RCE Rate
n=146
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=146

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=15 (min 20)
44.1%
§102 Overcome
n=34
47.1%
§103 Overcome
n=70
56.1%
§112 Overcome
n=66

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, A61Q
Top CPC Subclasses
53%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=146
0
Practitioners
n=146
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=146 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (57%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SPAINE, ROBERT FRANKLIN 2 75.0% +0.0%
CRUM, MARY ABOU NADER 1 40.4% +65.0%
HOFFMAN, SUSAN COE 1 54.2% +25.6%
TRAN, SUSAN T 1 62.8% +35.1%
CHEN, CATHERYNE 1 37.4% +18.0%
MOREAU, NASHARA LOUISE 1 80.0% -100.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18518451 METHOD FOR REGULATING IMMUNITY BY USING BLACK HULLESS BARLEY EXTRACT MOREAU, NASHARA LOUISE 75d

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18430680 METHODS FOR SUPPLEMENTING IRON, PROMOTING IRON ABSORPTION, AND/OR IMPROVING SKIN CONDITION BY USING SASKATOON BERRY EXTRACT HOFFMAN, SUSAN COE 12d
18395764 METHODS FOR IMPROVING BONE QUALITY AND PROMOTING CARTILAGE DIFFERENTIATION BY CHRYSOPHYLLUM CAINITO EXTRACT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF CHEN, CATHERYNE 14d
18786581 LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI TCI147 AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING SKIN CONDITION BY USING LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI TCI147 AND/OR METABOLITES THEREOF CRUM, MARY ABOU NADER —
18528783 METHODS FOR RESISTING SKIN AGING BY USING KIWIBERRY EXTRACT SPAINE, ROBERT FRANKLIN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18430680 METHODS FOR SUPPLEMENTING IRON, PROMOTING IRON ABSORPTION, AND/OR IMPROVING SKIN CONDITION BY USING SASKATOON BERRY EXTRACT HOFFMAN, SUSAN COE 12d
18395764 METHODS FOR IMPROVING BONE QUALITY AND PROMOTING CARTILAGE DIFFERENTIATION BY CHRYSOPHYLLUM CAINITO EXTRACT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF CHEN, CATHERYNE 14d
18786581 LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI TCI147 AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING SKIN CONDITION BY USING LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI TCI147 AND/OR METABOLITES THEREOF CRUM, MARY ABOU NADER —
18426360 METHODS FOR ENHANCING SKIN RESISTANCE, IMPROVING SKIN SMOOTHNESS, OR IMPROVING SKIN BRIGHTNESS BY USING AMPELOPSIS GROSSEDENTATA LEAF EXTRACT TRAN, SUSAN T —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
TCI CO., LTD. 7

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16555
16571
16151

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18786581 LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI TCI147 AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING SKIN CONDITION BY USING LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI TCI147 AND/OR METABOLITES THEREOF Tci Co., Ltd. CRUM, MARY ABOU NADER 1657 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2024
18430680 METHODS FOR SUPPLEMENTING IRON, PROMOTING IRON ABSORPTION, AND/OR IMPROVING SKIN CONDITION BY USING SASKATOON BERRY EXTRACT Tci Co., Ltd. HOFFMAN, SUSAN COE 1655 §103§112 Final Rejection 12d Pending Feb 02, 2024
18426360 METHODS FOR ENHANCING SKIN RESISTANCE, IMPROVING SKIN SMOOTHNESS, OR IMPROVING SKIN BRIGHTNESS BY USING AMPELOPSIS GROSSEDENTATA LEAF EXTRACT Tci Co., Ltd. TRAN, SUSAN T 1615 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 30, 2024
18409817 METHODS FOR IMPROVING SLEEP QUALITY, INCREASING MITOCHONDRIAL EXPRESSION, PROMOTING CELL REPAIRING, OR FIRMING SKIN BY USING SPARASSIA CRISPA EXTRACT Tci Co., Ltd. SPAINE, ROBERT FRANKLIN 1655 §103 Final Rejection 13d Pending Jan 11, 2024
18395764 METHODS FOR IMPROVING BONE QUALITY AND PROMOTING CARTILAGE DIFFERENTIATION BY CHRYSOPHYLLUM CAINITO EXTRACT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Tci Co., Ltd. CHEN, CATHERYNE 1655 §103§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Dec 26, 2023
18528783 METHODS FOR RESISTING SKIN AGING BY USING KIWIBERRY EXTRACT Tci Co., Ltd. SPAINE, ROBERT FRANKLIN 1655 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2023
18518451 METHOD FOR REGULATING IMMUNITY BY USING BLACK HULLESS BARLEY EXTRACT Tci Co., Ltd. MOREAU, NASHARA LOUISE 1655 §103 Non-Final OA 75d Pending Nov 23, 2023

Managing Wideband Ip Office's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month