Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Zilka-Kotab, Pc- Nvid

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications

15 pending office actions • 1 client • 15 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

ZILKA-KOTAB, PC- NVID operates in Communications and has 11 pending office actions. The profile reports 1303 career applications, supplying a broad historical base for assessing prosecution activity in this technology area. Its resolved allowance rate is 96.49%, which means the reported resolved outcomes are predominantly allowances.

Allowed matters involve an average of 4.22 office actions. This action average adds an important dimension to the allowance result: a favorable resolution rate does not mean that examination generally ends after a single exchange. For practitioners, the profile suggests planning for sustained prosecution work in communications cases, including repeated opportunities to clarify claim scope and address examiner objections. The pending docket is smaller than the historical application base, while still representing active matters requiring current attention.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1303 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

96.5%
Allowance Rate
n=1303
+0.67σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1303
4.2
OAs to Allowance
n=880
+0.52σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=880
1224 days
Time to Allowance
n=880
+1.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1303
37.8%
RCE Rate
n=1303
5.4%
Appeal Rate
n=1303

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

93.8%
§101 Overcome
n=257
86.9%
§102 Overcome
n=411
88.6%
§103 Overcome
n=701
85.6%
§112 Overcome
n=271

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06T, G09G
Top CPC Subclasses
41%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1303
0
Practitioners
n=1303
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1303 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (60%)
6
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (20%)
§103 only6 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
33% of docket
7
Communications
47% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
7% of docket
2
Business / Other
13% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
UDDIN, MD I 1 77.0% +73.5%
TRAN, JENNY NGAN 1 41.7% +50.0%
NGUYEN, CHAN T H 1 86.5% +2.7%
TSWEI, YU-JANG 1 83.7% +15.9%
PROTAZI, BRIGITER DIVULALE 1 50.0% +100.0%
TORRES, JOSE 1 82.0% +12.2%
BAYNES, SAMUEL DAVID 1 85.7% +22.2%
PHAKOUSONH, DARAVANH 1 16.7% +50.0%
PHAM, NAM D 1 90.8% +1.8%
FLORA, NURUN N 1 86.0% +1.9%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18915138 REDUCING LEVEL OF DETAIL OF A POLYGON MESH TO DECREASE A COMPLEXITY OF RENDERED GEOMETRY WITHIN A SCENE TSWEI, YU-JANG —
18637288 REDUCING FALSE-NEGATIVES IN 3D OBJECT DETECTION VIA MULTI-STAGE TRAINING BAYNES, SAMUEL DAVID —
18531544 VOXEL-TO-3D CONTENT GENERATOR FLORA, NURUN N —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18212629 SYNTHETIC DATASET GENERATOR LUDWIG, PETER L 30d overdue
19094441 CLOSEST SILHOUETTE QUERIES FOR RAY TRAVERSAL TRAN, JENNY NGAN —
19084565 CAMERA WITH COMPRESSIVE SENSING NGUYEN, CHAN T H —
18892186 SINGLE IMAGE TO REALISTIC 3D OBJECT GENERATION VIA SEMI-SUPERVISED 2D AND 3D JOINT TRAINING PROTAZI, BRIGITER DIVULALE —
18882629 DUAL FORMULATION FOR A COMPUTER VISION RETENTION MODEL TORRES, JOSE —
18602951 COMPRESSION OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS VIA SPARSIFICATION AND QUANTIZATION PHAKOUSONH, DARAVANH —
18593742 VARIATIONAL INFERENCING BY A DIFFUSION MODEL PHAM, NAM D —
18232757 MACHINE LEARNING FOR MASK OPTIMIZATION IN INVERSE LITHOGRAPHY TECHNOLOGIES KUDO, KEN —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18818422 Untitled UDDIN, MD I —
19094441 CLOSEST SILHOUETTE QUERIES FOR RAY TRAVERSAL TRAN, JENNY NGAN —
18915138 REDUCING LEVEL OF DETAIL OF A POLYGON MESH TO DECREASE A COMPLEXITY OF RENDERED GEOMETRY WITHIN A SCENE TSWEI, YU-JANG —
18892186 SINGLE IMAGE TO REALISTIC 3D OBJECT GENERATION VIA SEMI-SUPERVISED 2D AND 3D JOINT TRAINING PROTAZI, BRIGITER DIVULALE —
18882629 DUAL FORMULATION FOR A COMPUTER VISION RETENTION MODEL TORRES, JOSE —
18637288 REDUCING FALSE-NEGATIVES IN 3D OBJECT DETECTION VIA MULTI-STAGE TRAINING BAYNES, SAMUEL DAVID —
18602951 COMPRESSION OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS VIA SPARSIFICATION AND QUANTIZATION PHAKOUSONH, DARAVANH —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
NVIDIA 15

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21691
26381
26121
26641
26651
21211
24871
26191
24001
26711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18818422 Untitled Nvidia Corporation UDDIN, MD I 2169 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending
19094441 CLOSEST SILHOUETTE QUERIES FOR RAY TRAVERSAL Nvidia Corporation TRAN, JENNY NGAN §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2025
19084565 CAMERA WITH COMPRESSIVE SENSING Nvidia Corporation NGUYEN, CHAN T H 2638 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 19, 2025
18915138 REDUCING LEVEL OF DETAIL OF A POLYGON MESH TO DECREASE A COMPLEXITY OF RENDERED GEOMETRY WITHIN A SCENE Nvidia Corporation TSWEI, YU-JANG §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 14, 2024
18892186 SINGLE IMAGE TO REALISTIC 3D OBJECT GENERATION VIA SEMI-SUPERVISED 2D AND 3D JOINT TRAINING Nvidia Corporation PROTAZI, BRIGITER DIVULALE 2612 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18882629 DUAL FORMULATION FOR A COMPUTER VISION RETENTION MODEL Nvidia Corporation TORRES, JOSE 2664 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2024
18637288 REDUCING FALSE-NEGATIVES IN 3D OBJECT DETECTION VIA MULTI-STAGE TRAINING Nvidia Corporation BAYNES, SAMUEL DAVID 2665 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18602951 COMPRESSION OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS VIA SPARSIFICATION AND QUANTIZATION Nvidia Corporation PHAKOUSONH, DARAVANH 2121 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 12, 2024
18593742 VARIATIONAL INFERENCING BY A DIFFUSION MODEL Nvidia Corporation PHAM, NAM D 2487 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 01, 2024
18531544 VOXEL-TO-3D CONTENT GENERATOR Nvidia Corporation FLORA, NURUN N 2619 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2023
18243555 LANDMARK DETECTION WITH AN ITERATIVE NEURAL NETWORK Nvidia Corporation CZEKAJ, DAVID J 2400 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 07, 2023
18232757 MACHINE LEARNING FOR MASK OPTIMIZATION IN INVERSE LITHOGRAPHY TECHNOLOGIES Nvidia Corporation KUDO, KEN 2671 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 10, 2023
18212629 SYNTHETIC DATASET GENERATOR Nvidia Corporation LUDWIG, PETER L 3627 §101§103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Jun 21, 2023
18203552 DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORK MODEL SPARSIFICATION Nvidia Corporation GORMLEY, AARON PATRICK 2148 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 30, 2023
17893038 PERFORMING VISUAL RELATIONAL REASONING Nvidia Corporation DUONG, JOHNNYKHOI BAO 2667 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Aug 22, 2022

Managing Zilka-Kotab, Pc- Nvid's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Zilka-Kotab, Pc- Nvid's patent allowance rate?

96.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Zilka-Kotab, Pc- Nvid were allowed, across 1,303 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Zilka-Kotab, Pc- Nvid average before allowance?

4.22 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Zilka-Kotab, Pc- Nvid have?

15 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 15 examiners in 13 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month